Maryland Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

If you or someone in your family has been diagnosed with mesothelioma in Maryland, several types of claim may be possible: lawsuits against the companies that made and sold asbestos products, claims against the owners of sites where the worker was exposed while working for someone else, claims against asbestos bankruptcy trusts, and benefits for Navy veterans, federal civilian workers, and shipyard workers. Many Maryland families pursue more than one of these.

Maryland gives a diagnosed worker three years to file a personal-injury case, counted from when the worker knew or reasonably should have known of the disease and its cause, not from the long-past workplace exposure. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. After a death from a job-related asbestos disease, the family's wrongful-death claim generally has to be filed within three years of when the family knew or reasonably should have known what caused the death (usually three years from the death, when the diagnosis came during life), and never more than ten years after the death. One Maryland rule matters for every family: Maryland is one of only five jurisdictions (four states and the District of Columbia) that still use pure contributory negligence, which can bar a negligence claim if the worker is found even slightly at fault. That rule does not apply to strict products liability claims against the companies that made and sold asbestos products, which carry most Maryland asbestos cases. The safest step is to call as soon as possible after diagnosis.

You do not need to know the name of the asbestos product before you call. You do not need to have old employment records in hand. Many strong Maryland cases begin with one sentence: "Dad worked at Sparrows Point."

Was the exposure at a Maryland steel mill, shipyard, or federal facility?

Maryland's industrial heritage runs deep, and the asbestos footprint reflects it: steelmaking at Sparrows Point, a Baltimore shipbuilding cluster on the Inner Harbor and at Curtis Bay, steel and refractory work across the city, and a ring of federal installations from Annapolis to Aberdeen to Greenbelt. The asbestos trusts' published site lists hold more than 2,000 Maryland entries across 181 communities, from 28 trusts. Baltimore alone holds more than half of them.

Maryland worksite	City	Why it matters
Bethlehem Steel Sparrows Point plant	Sparrows Point	Listed by at least 16 trusts, including Johns-Manville. For a time the largest steel plant in the world; steel was made there from 1889 until 2012. Open hearths, blast furnaces, coke ovens, and the hot strip, plate, rod, tin, and wire mills.
Bethlehem Steel Key Highway Shipyard	Baltimore	Listed by at least 12 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Ship repair yard on the Inner Harbor.
Eastern Stainless Steel	Baltimore	Listed by at least 11 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Long-running specialty stainless operation with heavy refractory and insulation work.
Johns Hopkins Hospital	Baltimore	Listed by at least 11 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Generations of construction, boiler-room, and maintenance work.
Armco Steel	Baltimore	Listed by at least 10 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Baltimore steel operation with heavy refractory and pipe insulation exposure.
Naval Ordnance Station Indian Head	Indian Head	Listed by at least 10 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Navy powder and ordnance works since 1890; a federal installation (see the federal section below).
Maryland Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.	Baltimore (Curtis Bay)	Listed by at least 9 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Private Baltimore shipyard — pipefitters, insulators, machinists, electricians.
U.S. Coast Guard Yard	Baltimore (Curtis Bay)	Listed by at least 9 trusts, including Johns-Manville. The Coast Guard's shipyard since 1899; its civilian workers are federal employees, covered by FECA.
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center	Greenbelt	Listed by at least 8 trusts, including Johns-Manville. NASA facility since 1959; NASA's own civilian employees are covered by FECA.

Check Maryland asbestos exposure sites · Search the trusts' Maryland lists

Not seeing the worksite? That does not mean your family has no claim. Many successful Maryland claims are built from product-handling reconstruction, coworker information, union records, historical invoices, trust documents, and records from similar worksites.

Your legal options after a Maryland mesothelioma diagnosis

Think in claim paths, not one lawsuit. Many Maryland families have more than one path available.

Asbestos trust claims

Dozens of asbestos manufacturers filed for bankruptcy and established asbestos trusts to pay current and future victims. These trusts hold billions of dollars set aside specifically for asbestos victims. Trust claims are filed administratively — they do not require a lawsuit, and each trust applies its own rules rather than Maryland's contributory negligence rule or noneconomic damages cap. Trust payments can, however, reduce a later verdict, depending on the release terms. For a worker at the Sparrows Point plant, the trusts' lists name at least 16 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Learn more about asbestos trust claims.

Product liability lawsuits

The companies that made and sold asbestos insulation, refractory brick, gaskets, packing, cement, joint compound, and friction products can be sued directly. In Maryland, these cases are usually built on strict products liability, which Maryland's contributory negligence rule does not defeat. Learn more about product liability lawsuits.

Premises liability lawsuits

The owners of plants, refineries, power stations, and other sites can sometimes be sued by people who were exposed there while working for someone else, such as an outside contractor's employees. A company cannot be sued as premises owner by its own employees, and many of Maryland's old industrial owners, including Bethlehem Steel, have closed or gone through bankruptcy. Learn more about premises liability lawsuits.

Workers' compensation, LHWCA, FECA, VA, and Social Security

Benefits are a major path for Maryland families:

• VA service-connected disability for veterans whose service exposed them to asbestos, such as Navy shipboard service.
• FECA for federal civilian employees, including at NASA Goddard, NIH, the Coast Guard Yard, and the Navy and Army installations.
• LHWCA for private shipyard workers, such as at Bethlehem's Sparrows Point and Key Highway yards and Maryland Shipbuilding & Drydock.
• Maryland workers' compensation for other employees, against the employer.
• Social Security disability for claimants under full retirement age who can no longer work.

Learn more about asbestos disability claims.

"Can we choose not to sue?"

Yes. Some Maryland families pursue only trust claims and federal benefits and never file a lawsuit. We respect that choice. Our job is to lay out the full picture, recommend what we believe is best for your family, and then follow your lead. We will not pressure you into a court case you do not want.

Uncomfortable with the idea of a lawsuit? So was Clarence Borel. He spent 33 years as an insulator on the Gulf Coast and didn't believe in suing anyone — until he realized his coworkers would die the same way he was dying. His 1969 lawsuit helped establish the product-liability law that protects families today, and the cases that followed it eventually led to the bankruptcy trusts that pay claims now. Read his story.

How long do I have to file a Maryland mesothelioma claim?

Maryland gives a diagnosed worker three years to file a personal-injury case. Under Maryland's discovery rule, the clock starts when the worker knew or reasonably should have known of the disease and its cause, not at the long-past workplace exposure. For a cancer with a 20-to-50-year latency, that distinction is critical. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. An earlier diagnosis of asbestosis does not start the clock for a later mesothelioma in Maryland: the three years run from the cancer's own diagnosis. But other early findings and an earlier lawsuit can matter, so call us right away.

After a death, two claims are possible. The family's wrongful-death claim: if the asbestos disease came from the worker's job, it must be filed within three years of when the family knew or reasonably should have known the cause of death (usually three years from the death, when the diagnosis came during life), and never more than ten years after the death; for other deaths, such as a family member exposed at home, it is three years from the death. The claim belongs to the family and isn't lost because the worker's own deadline had passed. Separately, the worker's own claim survives as a survival action brought by the estate, and it keeps the worker's own three-year deadline.

Workers' compensation has its own, shorter deadlines: written notice to the employer within one year after the worker knows or has reason to believe he has the disease (or within one year of the death), and a claim within two years (three for a pulmonary dust disease) after disablement or death, or after the worker learned the disease was caused by work.

One important Maryland rule: Maryland is one of only five jurisdictions that still use pure contributory negligence. If a company proves the worker was negligent in a way that contributed to the illness, which means showing the worker knew or should have known of the danger, a negligence claim fails. The rule does not apply to strict products liability claims against the companies that made and sold asbestos products. A company can still argue assumption of risk: that the worker knowingly and voluntarily faced a known danger. These are questions for the jury on the facts of each case, so no Maryland family should wait to call.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS — free case review.

Legal detail: Maryland filing deadlines

Statute of limitations — personal injury. Three years from accrual. Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101.

Discovery rule. Maryland applies the discovery rule in all civil actions (Poffenberger v. Risser, 431 A.2d 677 (Md. 1981)). A latent-disease claim accrues when the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of the nature and cause of the harm. Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 464 A.2d 1020 (Md. 1983) (citing Harig v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp., 394 A.2d 299 (Md. 1978)): an insulator's lung cancer accrued when he knew or should have known of the cancer, not when an earlier asbestosis, for which he never sought tort recovery, was diagnosed.

Fraud. Where a defendant's own fraud kept knowledge of the claim from the plaintiff, the claim accrues when the plaintiff discovered, or with ordinary diligence should have discovered, the fraud. § 5-203.

Statute of repose — improvements to real property. § 5-108: 20 years after the improvement is first available for use; 10 years for architects, professional engineers, and contractors. Under § 5-108(d)(2) it does not apply to a defendant in actual possession and control of the property as owner, tenant, or otherwise when the injury occurred; to a manufacturer or supplier of asbestos products (a "supplier" being an entity whose principal business is supplying, distributing, installing, or selling them) where the exposure was to fibers released before or during installation; or to other asbestos claims against a manufacturer of an asbestos-containing product.

Wrongful death. § 3-904(g)(1): three years after the death. § 3-904(g)(2): if an occupational disease (a disease from exposure to a toxic substance in the person's workplace, contracted in the course of employment) was a cause of death, within 10 years of the death or within 3 years of the date the cause of death was discovered, whichever is shorter; § 5-113 sets the same outer limits for damages actions arising out of an occupational disease. The discovery rule applies to § 3-904(g)(2): the period runs once the claimant knows the person was diagnosed with mesothelioma and was exposed to asbestos at work, and in a survival action the decedent's own knowledge starts the clock. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Benjamin, 904 A.2d 511 (Md. 2006). The family's claim is not contingent on the decedent's ability to have filed a timely claim before death. Mummert v. Alizadeh, 77 A.3d 1049 (Md. 2013). It is a new and independent claim not barred by a judgment the decedent obtained in life. Spangler v. McQuitty, 449 Md. 33 (2016).

Survival. Causes of action survive death (§ 6-401); the personal representative brings them (Md. Code Ann., Est. & Trusts § 7-401(y)). The survival claim keeps the decedent's own limitations period.

Workers' compensation. Written notice of an occupational disease must be given to the employer within 1 year after the employee knows or has reason to believe he has the disease, or within 1 year after the death, unless waived or excused (Lab. & Empl. §§ 9-705, 9-706). An occupational-disease claim must be filed within 2 years, or 3 years for pulmonary dust disease, after disablement or death or after actual knowledge that the disablement was caused by the employment. Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. § 9-711.

Who can be sued in a Maryland asbestos case?

Most Maryland asbestos cases name several companies at once, because a long career brings exposure to many companies' products.

Product manufacturers and suppliers

The companies that made and sold asbestos insulation, refractory brick, gaskets, packing, cement, joint compound, and friction products. Maryland recognizes strict products liability, which Maryland's contributory negligence rule does not defeat. Makers of pumps and valves that needed asbestos gaskets and packing can also owe a duty to warn in some circumstances.

Premises owners and site operators

Owners of plants, refineries, power stations, and other sites can be responsible to people who were exposed there while working for someone else, such as an outside contractor's employees. An owner that hired a contractor generally isn't responsible for the contractor's own negligence, but can be for hazards it created or controlled. Many of Maryland's old industrial owners, including Bethlehem Steel, have closed or gone through bankruptcy; a claim against one of them, if any, runs through a successor or insurer. Federal installations are not premises defendants (see the federal section below).

Asbestos bankruptcy trusts

Manufacturers that filed for bankruptcy — Johns Manville, Owens Corning, Babcock & Wilcox, A.P. Green, Eagle-Picher, Combustion Engineering, Flexitallic, Pittsburgh Corning, Fibreboard, Owens-Illinois, and many others — established asbestos trusts that pay victims directly through an administrative process.

Employers

In most Maryland asbestos cases, you do not sue your employer. Maryland workers' compensation is generally the exclusive remedy against the employer, including for an occupational disease, and in 2025 the Supreme Court of Maryland held that this also bars a wrongful-death claim against the employer by the worker's non-dependent adult children. The narrow exceptions are an employer that failed to carry workers' compensation coverage and an employer's deliberate intent to injure or kill. None of this stops a claim against the companies that made the products or against other site owners.

Legal detail: Maryland product liability, premises liability, and workers' compensation

Strict products liability. Maryland adopted Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A in Phipps v. Gen. Motors Corp., 363 A.2d 955 (Md. 1976). The plaintiff must show that (1) the product was defective when it left the seller's possession or control, (2) it was unreasonably dangerous, (3) the defect was a cause of the injury, and (4) the product reached the user without substantial change.

Contributory negligence and assumption of risk. Contributory negligence remains a complete bar in negligence; the Court of Appeals declined to abandon it in Coleman v. Soccer Ass'n of Columbia, 69 A.3d 1149 (Md. 2013). It is not a defense to strict liability. Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc., 495 A.2d 348 (Md. 1985); Montgomery Cty. v. Valk Mfg. Co., 562 A.2d 1246 (Md. 1989). But assumption of risk (knowledge of the danger, voluntarily encountered) is an affirmative defense even in strict liability, and misuse bears on defect and causation. Ellsworth. Contributory negligence does not apply to intentional conduct (Coleman); a fraud claim requires proof of the plaintiff's own reliance.

Replacement parts. A manufacturer has a duty to warn of asbestos replacement gaskets and packing it did not sell when its product contained asbestos components and no safer material was available, asbestos was a critical part of the product, periodic maintenance involving the asbestos parts was required, and it knew or should have known of the risk. May v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp., 446 Md. 1 (2015).

Sellers. In a claim of defective design or manufacture, a seller has a defense if it proves that it acquired and sold the product in a sealed container or unaltered form, had no knowledge of the defect, could not have discovered it with reasonable care, did not design or specify the product, and did not alter or mishandle it; the defense is unavailable if, among other things, the manufacturer is not subject to service in Maryland, has been judicially declared insolvent, cannot be identified, or is immune from suit. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-405.

Premises liability. Maryland's entrant categories are invitee, licensee by invitation, bare licensee, and trespasser; an invitee is owed ordinary care. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. Flippo, 705 A.2d 1144 (Md. 1998). One who hires an independent contractor is generally not liable for the contractor's negligence, subject to the exceptions in Restatement (Second) §§ 416–429. Rowley v. Mayor of Baltimore, 505 A.2d 494 (Md. 1986). A principal contractor that undertakes work that is part of its own business and subcontracts part of that work is liable for workers' compensation to the subcontractor's employees doing that work, and is considered their employer for comp purposes. Lab. & Empl. § 9-508.

Workers' compensation. The employer's liability is exclusive (Lab. & Empl. § 9-509(a)), except where the employer fails to secure coverage (§ 9-509(c)) or deliberately intends to injure or kill the employee (§ 9-509(d)). The bar extends to a wrongful-death claim by a non-dependent adult child. Ledford v. Jenway Contracting, Inc., No. 3, Sept. Term 2024 (Md. July 1, 2025). Claims against other liable parties are preserved (§ 9-901). After an award, the insurer or self-insured employer may sue the third party; if it hasn't within two months, the worker or dependents may, and their limitations period does not begin to run until two months after the first award (§ 9-902(a), (c), (d)). From any recovery the worker repays the compensation and medical benefits paid, after the costs of the action (§ 9-902(e)).

Statutory violations. The violation of a statute may furnish evidence of negligence. Atl. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kenney, 591 A.2d 507 (Md. 1991).

What compensation can a Maryland mesothelioma case recover?

Personal-injury compensation

A Maryland mesothelioma personal-injury case can recover:

• Medical expenses — past and future. The companies get no credit for insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or workers' compensation payments, but workers' comp, Medicare, and some health plans are repaid out of the recovery.
• Lost wages and lost earning capacity — past and future, reduced to present value.
• Pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. Maryland caps these damages, but the cap does not apply against a company whose asbestos product the worker last breathed before July 1, 1986, which describes most Maryland mesothelioma cases. For later exposure, the cap is the figure for the year the claim arose: $980,000 for claims arising from October 1, 2026, and $965,000 for the year before. A spouse's loss of consortium shares the worker's cap.
• Punitive damages — Maryland has no cap, but they are rare: the family must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the company actually knew of the danger when its product left its hands and consciously or deliberately disregarded it. Maryland's highest court has reversed asbestos punitive awards that did not meet that standard.

Wrongful-death compensation

The family's wrongful-death claim can recover lost financial support and, for a spouse, a minor child, or the parent of a minor child, mental anguish, emotional pain and suffering, and loss of society, companionship, comfort, protection, care, attention, advice, counsel, training, guidance, or education; other children and parents can recover similar losses. These noneconomic damages are capped at the figure for the year of the death ($980,000 for deaths from October 1, 2026), or 150% of it with two or more beneficiaries ($1,470,000). Punitive damages cannot be recovered in the wrongful-death claim. The worker's own claim, continued by the estate, recovers the worker's pain and suffering, medical bills, and lost wages before death, funeral expenses, and any punitive damages.

Legal detail: Maryland damages and wrongful death

Noneconomic damages cap — Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 11-108. $350,000 for personal-injury causes of action arising on or after July 1, 1986; $500,000 for personal-injury or wrongful-death causes of action arising on or after October 1, 1994, increased by $15,000 each October 1 beginning in 1995, each figure applying to causes of action arising from October 1 through the following September 30 (§ 11-108(b)(2)). $965,000 for causes arising October 1, 2025 to September 30, 2026; $980,000 from October 1, 2026. Wrongful death with two or more claimants: 150% (§ 11-108(b)(3)(ii)). Noneconomic damages include loss of consortium, and one cap covers the direct victim and everyone claiming through the victim (§ 11-108(a)(2), (b)(3)(i)). Punitive damages are not noneconomic damages (§ 11-108(a)(2)(ii)).

When an asbestos claim "arises." The court may look to the plaintiff's last exposure to the defendant's asbestos-containing product: if it was undisputedly before July 1, 1986, the cap does not apply as a matter of law; with exposure on both sides of that date and a genuine dispute, the plaintiff must prove the claim arose earlier, and the jury decides. John Crane, Inc. v. Scribner, 800 A.2d 727 (Md. 2002). A wrongful-death claim arises at the death, and the wrongful-death cap applies to asbestos deaths. Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw, 692 A.2d 5 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1997).

Punitive damages. Actual malice, proved by clear and convincing evidence; in a products case, actual knowledge of the defect and danger when the product left the defendant's possession, and conscious or deliberate disregard of the harm. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 601 A.2d 633 (Md. 1992) (an asbestos case). ACandS, Inc. v. Asner, 686 A.2d 250 (Md. 1996) (Baltimore City asbestos punitive verdicts held legally insufficient). Recoverable in a survival action (Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co., 297 A.2d 721 (Md. 1972)), but not in a wrongful-death action.

Collateral source rule. Benefits from sources independent of the defendant are not deducted, and evidence of them is ordinarily inadmissible. Haischer v. CSX Transp., Inc., 848 A.2d 620 (Md. 2004). Workers' compensation is repaid from a third-party recovery under Lab. & Empl. § 9-902(e).

Wrongful death. Cts. & Jud. Proc. §§ 3-901 to 3-904. Beneficiaries: spouse, parent, and child (§ 3-904(a)); if none, a relative by blood or marriage substantially dependent on the deceased (§ 3-904(b)). Damages: § 3-904(c)–(e). Only one wrongful-death action lies (§ 3-904(f)).

Survival. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 6-401; Est. & Trusts § 7-401(y) (personal representative; funeral expenses).

What evidence do we need to prove a Maryland asbestos case?

You do not need to gather everything before calling. Most Maryland families start with very little — a worksite name, a job title, a rough idea of the years worked. We build the rest.

Evidence	Why it helps	What if you do not have it?
Diagnosis records	Confirms mesothelioma and the type	Sign a medical release; we obtain the records.
Work history (jobs, dates, employers)	Identifies which products and which sites	A spouse or adult child's recollection is enough to start.
Military records (DD-214)	Opens VA and federal pathways	We help request records from NPRC.
Union records	Documents trade and shift assignments	We request from the union directly.
Coworker names	Powerful corroborating witnesses	Often filled in as the case develops.
Photographs of worksites	Identifies products on site	Not required — many cases proceed without.
Witness statements from family	Establish take-home exposure	We take these as part of intake.

Most Maryland cases are built from a combination of these — not all of them. Our exposure database often tells us on day one which manufacturers and trusts apply to a given Maryland worksite.

How does Maryland divide responsibility when many asbestos companies were involved?

Mesothelioma is a cumulative-exposure disease — over a 30- or 40-year career, a worker is often exposed to products made by a dozen or more companies. Maryland law handles this in three ways.

First, causation is proved company by company. Your family does not have to prove that any single company's product was the cause. For each company, the family must show that exposure to its product was a substantial factor, judged by the kind of product and how often, how regularly, and how close the worker was to it. Evidence that a product was used somewhere in a large plant is not enough; it has to be tied to where the worker actually worked.

Second, joint and several liability. When several companies are found responsible for the same harm, the family can collect the full compensatory damages from any of them, and the companies sort out their shares among themselves. A settlement with one company reduces what the others owe, by the amount paid or by a larger share if the release says so.

Third, bankrupt manufacturers are reached through trust claims. The trusts apply their own rules, but trust payments can reduce a later verdict, depending on the release terms.

Legal detail: contributory negligence, causation, joint and several liability, and settlement credits

Contributory negligence. A plaintiff's negligence that contributed to the injury bars a negligence claim. Coleman v. Soccer Ass'n of Columbia, 69 A.3d 1149 (Md. 2013) (declining to adopt comparative negligence; Maryland, Virginia, Alabama, North Carolina, and the District of Columbia retain the rule). Not a defense to strict liability; assumption of risk is. Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc., 495 A.2d 348 (Md. 1985).

Causation. Substantial-factor causation in asbestos cases turns on the nature of the product and the frequency of its use, the regularity of the plaintiff's exposure, and the plaintiff's proximity to it; bystanders can recover on that showing. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. Balbos, 604 A.2d 445 (Md. 1992) (Bethlehem shipyard workers). Evidence that a product was used somewhere at a large site, without evidence of its use where the plaintiff worked, is not enough. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville, 418 Md. 496 (2011) (discussing Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, 417 Md. 57 (2010)). Expert testimony must meet the reliability standard Maryland adopted in Rochkind v. Stevenson, 471 Md. 1 (2020).

Joint and several liability — Maryland Uniform Contribution Among Joint Tort-Feasors Act. Cts. & Jud. Proc. §§ 3-1401 to 3-1409. Joint tort-feasors are jointly or severally liable for the same injury (§ 3-1401(c)) and have a right of contribution (§ 3-1402). A release of one does not discharge the others, but reduces the claim by the consideration paid or by any greater amount or proportion the release provides (§ 3-1404); see § 3-1405 for pro rata releases. Payments from bankruptcy trusts reduce a judgment only as the release terms provide; a trust that denies liability without joint tort-feasor terms produces no offset. Scapa, 418 Md. 496.

How trust claims, lawsuits, and benefits can work together

These tracks can run alongside each other, but they interact, and the order of filing is decided case by case with our trial team. A civil or trust recovery doesn't reduce VA disability. FECA and workers' compensation have repayment rights, and workers' comp can offset Social Security disability. VA and FECA for the same disease generally require an election.

Track	What it is	How it fits the Maryland case
Asbestos trust claims	Administrative claims against bankrupt manufacturers' trusts. No lawsuit required.	Each trust applies its own rules, not Maryland's contributory negligence rule or damages cap. Trust payments can reduce a later verdict, depending on the release terms, and Baltimore City's asbestos docket has required trust claim forms to be produced before trial.
Lawsuit against solvent companies	Filed in a Maryland circuit court (many in Baltimore City, which runs a dedicated asbestos docket) or in federal court.	Usually strict products liability and negligence against the companies that made and sold the products; joint and several liability; punitive damages only in rare cases.
Federal benefits (VA, LHWCA, FECA, SSDI)	Benefits programs for veterans, private shipyard workers, federal civilian employees, and disabled workers under full retirement age.	Each has its own rules; some must be coordinated with the civil case or repaid from it.
Maryland workers' compensation	State occupational-disease benefits against the employer.	Generally the employer's only liability; compensation paid is repaid from a lawsuit recovery.

Maryland shipyard, Navy, and federal-facility exposure

Maryland's federal facilities include the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis (Navy, founded 1845), Fort Meade (Army installation; current NSA headquarters and U.S. Cyber Command), Aberdeen Proving Ground (major Army ordnance testing and research facility since 1917), Joint Base Andrews (Air Force; home of Air Force One), Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center (Navy ordnance and energetics research since 1890), Patuxent River Naval Air Station (Navy aviation; NAVAIR headquarters; Naval Test Pilot School), the U.S. Coast Guard Yard at Curtis Bay (the only operational shipyard for the U.S. Coast Guard, in service since 1899), Naval Support Activity Bethesda / Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center at Greenbelt (major NASA spaceflight facility since 1959), and other federal facilities including NIH Bethesda, the FDA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at Woodlawn, the Social Security Administration headquarters, and U.S. Army Garrison Fort Detrick at Frederick.

Federal installations are workplaces, not defendants. A federal civilian employee's remedy against the United States is FECA; active-duty service members can't sue the United States for service-related injuries; and a household member's own illness is a separate injury, for which any claim against the United States goes through the Federal Tort Claims Act. The companies that made the asbestos products used at these installations can still be sued.

Federal-program pathways:

• VA service-connected disability for Navy, Air Force, Army, Marine, and Coast Guard veterans. The VA has no automatic presumption for asbestos diseases, but it treats in-service asbestos exposure as likely for many Navy ratings; a claim still needs a diagnosis and a doctor's opinion linking the disease to service.
• FECA for federal civilian employees, including at NASA Goddard, NIH, the FDA, the Coast Guard Yard, Fort Meade, Aberdeen, Indian Head, and the Naval Academy. FECA is the exclusive remedy against the United States; a lawsuit or trust recovery for the same illness must be partly repaid to FECA; and FECA and VA benefits for the same disease generally require an election.
• LHWCA for private shipyard workers, such as at Bethlehem's Sparrows Point and Key Highway yards and Maryland Shipbuilding & Drydock. A settlement with a third party for less than the compensation due needs the prior written approval of the employer and its insurer; accepting compensation under an award assigns the worker's third-party claim to the employer unless the worker sues within six months; and the employer gets a credit for the worker's net third-party recovery.
• Social Security disability for claimants under full retirement age who can no longer work.

We coordinate the federal filings with the civil case and the trust claims, case by case.

Legal detail: federal programs and military products

FECA. 5 U.S.C. § 8116(c) (exclusive against the United States); § 8116(b) (election between FECA and other United States benefits for the same injury or death); § 8132 (refund from a third-party recovery). LHWCA. No compensation for an officer or employee of the United States (33 U.S.C. § 903(b)); employer liability exclusive (§ 905(a)); § 933(b) (assignment six months after accepting compensation under an award), § 933(f) (credit), § 933(g) (prior written approval of settlements below the compensation due).

Government-contractor defense. Manufacturers of military-specification products often raise the federal government-contractor defense, which requires that the United States approved reasonably precise specifications, the equipment conformed to them, and the supplier warned the United States about dangers known to the supplier but not to the government. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988). Such cases are often removed to federal court under the federal-officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442.

What happens after you call?

A free case review is a conversation, not a commitment to file a lawsuit.

1. Initial call. We listen. Worksite, job, approximate years, diagnosis, family situation. Usually under 30 minutes.
2. Database match. We run the worksite against our Maryland exposure records — often we know on the same call which trusts apply.
3. Recommendation. We explain the realistic claim paths — trust claims, lawsuit, federal benefits — and what each may produce.
4. Retention (only if you want to proceed). No fee unless we recover. Contingent fee.
5. Trust claims, benefits, and lawsuit. The order and timing are decided case by case with our trial team.
6. Lawsuit prepared and filed. Pleaded on the claims Maryland law supports, usually strict products liability and negligence against the companies that made and sold the products.
7. Federal benefits. VA, LHWCA, FECA, and SSDI as applicable, coordinated with the civil case.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS when you are ready.

How Maryland's laws may work in practice

Daniel is a 71-year-old retired millwright from Dundalk, the community beside Sparrows Point on the eastern side of Baltimore. From 1973 through 2005 he worked at the Sparrows Point plant — for Bethlehem Steel until its 2003 sale to International Steel Group, then for ISG — doing millwright work on the basic oxygen furnaces and open hearths, refractory replacement in the blast furnaces, pipefitting on steam and process piping in the boiler houses, and gasket and packing maintenance on the rolling mills and hot strip mill. He retired in 2005. He had no significant health complaints until November 2025, when shortness of breath sent him to his doctor. In March 2026, a pericardial biopsy and pathology review at Johns Hopkins confirmed pericardial mesothelioma of the biphasic histological subtype.

His wife and adult children lived with steel-mill dust on his work clothes for decades. As part of our representation, we offer free asbestos health screening to family members of every client who may have been exposed at home. The screening is a chest X-ray read by a B-reader, with a CT scan if needed; it looks for asbestos-related changes in the lungs and isn't a diagnosis or a reliable way to find mesothelioma early. Maryland law on take-home claims is restrictive (see the FAQ below), so any family member who later became ill would need a case-specific review.

For Daniel himself, the case has several parts. He cannot sue Bethlehem Steel or ISG: they were his employers, and Maryland workers' compensation is his remedy against them (Bethlehem also went through bankruptcy in 2001). His lawsuit is against the companies that made and sold the insulation, refractory brick and cement, gaskets, and packing he handled, built mainly on strict products liability, which Maryland's contributory negligence rule does not defeat. Against companies whose products he last breathed before July 1, 1986, Maryland's cap on pain-and-suffering damages does not apply. Trust claims go to the trusts that list the Sparrows Point plant — at least 16, including Johns-Manville — and he has a Maryland workers' compensation claim with its own deadline. To be safe, the lawsuit is filed well before March 2029, three years from his diagnosis, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. At 71, Daniel is past full retirement age, so Social Security disability is not part of his case. If Daniel dies before the case ends, his estate continues his own claim, and his family has its own wrongful-death claim.

Legal analysis of this hypothetical

Limitations. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101: three years from accrual, when he knew or reasonably should have known of the disease and its cause (Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 464 A.2d 1020 (Md. 1983)). Counted from the March 2026 diagnosis to be safe: file well before March 2029.

Claims.

• Strict products liability under Restatement (Second) § 402A (Phipps v. Gen. Motors Corp., 363 A.2d 955 (Md. 1976)) against the makers and sellers of pipe insulation, refractory products, gaskets, and packing. Contributory negligence is not a defense; assumption of risk is (Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc., 495 A.2d 348 (Md. 1985)).
• Negligence, subject to the contributory negligence defense.
• Pump and valve makers for asbestos replacement gaskets and packing, in the circumstances described in May v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp., 446 Md. 1 (2015).
• Causation company by company, with coworker testimony tying each product to the furnaces, boiler houses, and mills where he worked (Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. Balbos, 604 A.2d 445 (Md. 1992); Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville, 418 Md. 496 (2011)).

No claim against his employers. Lab. & Empl. § 9-509 (Bethlehem Steel and ISG were his employers; Bethlehem filed for bankruptcy in 2001). Workers' compensation: written notice to the employer within 1 year after he knew or had reason to believe he had the disease (§ 9-705), and a claim within 2 years, or 3 for pulmonary dust disease, of disablement or of actual knowledge that the disease was work-related (§ 9-711); compensation paid is repaid from any lawsuit recovery (§ 9-902(e)).

Noneconomic cap. His exposure ran from 1973 to 2005. Against a company whose product he last breathed before July 1, 1986, the cap does not apply; against companies whose products he breathed after that date, the cap figure follows the year the claim arose, and if that is disputed he must prove the earlier date (John Crane, Inc. v. Scribner, 800 A.2d 727 (Md. 2002); Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 11-108).

Settlements and trusts. Settlements reduce the claim against the remaining companies under § 3-1404; trust payments do so as the release terms provide (Scapa). Trusts: the Sparrows Point plant is listed by at least 16 trusts, including Johns-Manville.

Punitive damages. Only with clear and convincing proof that a particular company actually knew of the danger when its product left its hands and consciously or deliberately disregarded it (Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 601 A.2d 633 (Md. 1992)).

Federal programs. No SSDI (past full retirement age); no LHWCA (steel plant, not a shipyard); no FECA (private employer); VA only with a described in-service exposure.

After death. The family's wrongful-death claim: within 10 years of the death or 3 years of discovering the cause of death, whichever is shorter (§ 3-904(g)(2)); it is the family's own claim (Mummert v. Alizadeh, 77 A.3d 1049 (Md. 2013); Spangler v. McQuitty, 449 Md. 33 (2016)), with noneconomic damages capped at 150% of the figure for the year of death. The estate continues his own claim (§ 6-401; Est. & Trusts § 7-401(y)), including any punitive damages (Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co., 297 A.2d 721 (Md. 1972)).

This example is general. Every case depends on the diagnosis, exposure history, dates, defendants, applicable law, and available evidence.

Why families choose our firm

Our firm has recovered over $400 million for asbestos clients nationally. Our Maryland work draws on a database of 200,000+ verified asbestos exposure sites built over more than a decade, including the asbestos trusts' Maryland lists: more than 2,000 entries across 181 communities, from 28 trusts. We routinely get claims approved by many asbestos trusts.

• No investigation lag. We often know on day one which trusts list a worksite: the Sparrows Point plant (at least 16 trusts), the Key Highway shipyard (at least 12), Eastern Stainless Steel (at least 11), Johns Hopkins Hospital (at least 11), Armco Steel (at least 10), and Maryland Shipbuilding & Drydock (at least 9), each including Johns-Manville.
• Cases built for Maryland law. Strict products liability, which Maryland's contributory negligence rule does not defeat, with causation evidence tied to the places the worker actually worked.
• Filing during life. Filing while the worker can testify preserves his own account of where and how he was exposed. Call as soon as possible after diagnosis.
• Federal-program coordination. VA disability for veterans, LHWCA for private shipyard workers, FECA for federal civilian employees, and Social Security disability for claimants under full retirement age, coordinated with the civil case and trust claims.
• Trust coverage beyond the lists. Even where the worksite is not on a trust's approved list, we use product-handling reconstruction to support claims against every trust the evidence supports.
• Remote and home-visit case handling. You do not need to travel to our office. Maryland cases run by phone, video, and home visit where helpful.
• No fee unless we recover. Contingent fee. In Maryland the winning side is generally entitled to its court costs; we discuss every settlement offer with the family before anyone responds to it.

Learn more about our firm and asbestos database.