If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma after working in South Carolina, several claim paths may be open. These usually include lawsuits against the manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos products, sometimes lawsuits against the owners of the mills, plants and power stations where an outside contractor's employees were exposed, claims against asbestos bankruptcy trusts set up to pay asbestos victims, and workers' compensation and federal benefits for veterans, federal civilian workers, and Department of Energy contractor workers at the Savannah River Site.
South Carolina gives a diagnosed worker three years to file a personal-injury claim. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. After a death, the family's wrongful-death claim has three years from the date of death. The safest step is to call as soon as possible after diagnosis.
You do not need to know the name of the asbestos product before you call. Many strong South Carolina cases begin with one sentence: "Dad worked at the Charleston shipyard," or "My husband spent thirty years at the paper mill in Georgetown." We rebuild the exposure history using employment records, coworker information, product invoices, and our database of 200,000+ verified asbestos exposure sites.
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Quick answers
| How long do we have to file? | Usually three years. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. If your loved one has already passed away, the wrongful-death claim has three years from the date of death. Call as soon as you can. |
|---|---|
| Does a claim always mean filing a lawsuit? | No. Some South Carolina families recover only through asbestos bankruptcy trust claims and benefits, with no lawsuit at all. Many cases combine both paths. |
| Who may be responsible? | The manufacturers and suppliers of the asbestos products your loved one worked with or around, sometimes the owners of the sites where an outside contractor's employees worked, and, through the trust system, companies that have since gone bankrupt. |
| What compensation may be available? | Medical expenses, lost wages and earning capacity, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of companionship for a spouse, and in some cases punitive damages. South Carolina does not cap compensatory damages in these cases; punitive damages are capped. |
| What evidence do we need? | A diagnosis and a general work history are usually enough to start. We rebuild the rest. |
| Do I have to come to your office? | No. We handle South Carolina cases by phone, video, and home visit. Many of our clients never come to an office. |
| Can an adult child or spouse call? | Yes. Most calls come from a spouse or adult child. We will speak with whoever in the family is best able to gather information. |
“I started this firm after learning that the cancers that killed my father and grandparents were caused by asbestos, something we did not realize until it was too late to hold anyone accountable. That experience is why we built this site: so that no other family misses their chance to ask the questions, hear the options, and decide for themselves what to do.”
Was the exposure at a South Carolina shipyard, paper mill, power plant, or military base?
South Carolina's industrial history runs through coastal and Piedmont paper mills, the Charleston Naval Shipyard, the Savannah River Site, Duke Power and SCE&G generating stations, the synthetic-fiber and chemical plants of the Midlands, Pee Dee and Upstate, the textile mills, and a large group of military installations. The asbestos trusts' lists hold more than 1,000 South Carolina entries across 178 communities, from 27 asbestos trusts. Dozens of our clients worked at South Carolina job sites.
| South Carolina worksite | City | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| DuPont May Plant | Camden | At least 14 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Orlon acrylic fiber plant from 1950. |
| Charleston Naval Shipyard | North Charleston | At least 14 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Built and overhauled Navy ships from 1901 until it closed in 1996. Its civilian workforce were federal employees. |
| Westvaco Charleston mill (West Virginia Pulp & Paper) | Charleston | At least 13 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Kraft paper mill on the Cooper River. |
| International Paper Georgetown mill | Georgetown | At least 10 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Kraft pulp and paper mill on Winyah Bay since the late 1930s. |
| Duke Power Oconee Nuclear Station | Seneca | At least 10 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Boilermakers, pipefitters, insulators. |
| Savannah River Site | Aiken | At least 9 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Department of Energy nuclear complex from the early 1950s; contractor workers may qualify for federal EEOICPA benefits. |
| DuPont Florence plant | Florence | At least 9 trusts, including Johns-Manville. |
| Bowater Catawba mill | Catawba | At least 8 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Newsprint and pulp mill from the late 1950s. |
| Celanese Rock Hill plant | Rock Hill | At least 8 trusts, including Johns-Manville. |
| Hercules fibers plant (Hystron, Hoechst Fibers) | Spartanburg | At least 7 trusts, including Johns-Manville. |
| Upstate and Midlands textile mills | Graniteville, Greenwood, Lancaster and others | Graniteville Company, Greenwood Mills and Springs Cotton Mills each appear on at least 5 or 6 trusts' lists. Boiler insulation, machinery gaskets and packing, steam systems. |
| Military installations | Parris Island, Beaufort, Columbia, Sumter, Charleston | MCRD Parris Island, MCAS Beaufort, Fort Jackson, Shaw AFB and Joint Base Charleston. Veterans may qualify for VA disability; federal civilian employees have FECA. |
Check South Carolina asbestos exposure sites
Not seeing the worksite? That does not mean your family has no claim. Many successful South Carolina claims are built from product-handling reconstruction, coworker information, historical invoices, trust documents, and records from similar worksites in the same industry.
Your legal options after a South Carolina mesothelioma diagnosis
Think in terms of claim paths, not a single lawsuit. Most South Carolina families have more than one path open to them.
Asbestos trust claims
When many asbestos manufacturers filed for bankruptcy, they set up asbestos trusts to pay current and future victims. Trust claims are filed through a paper-and-evidence process, not a courtroom trial, and don't require the company to still be in business. Learn more about asbestos trust claims.
Product liability lawsuits
Lawsuits against the manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos products — insulation, gaskets, packing, refractory cement, joint compound, and the many other asbestos-containing materials used in South Carolina shipyards, mills, and plants — are the core of most cases. South Carolina allows strict product-liability claims as well as negligence claims, and each company's product has to be linked to the worker's exposure. Learn more about product liability lawsuits.
Premises liability lawsuits
Sometimes the private companies that owned the mills, plants, and power stations where an outside contractor's employees were exposed can also be responsible. A worker can't sue his own employer this way, a site owner may argue it was the worker's "statutory employer" under the workers' compensation law, and Navy bases and other federal installations are not sued as property owners. Learn more about premises liability lawsuits.
Workers' compensation, EEOICPA, FECA, VA, and Social Security
Benefits can be pursued alongside a civil case. South Carolina workers' compensation covers asbestos disease as an occupational disease, with its own notice and claim deadlines. Civilian workers at the Charleston Naval Shipyard and other federal installations were federal employees covered by FECA. Contractor workers at the Savannah River Site may qualify under the federal Energy Employees program (EEOICPA). Veterans with in-service asbestos exposure may qualify for VA service-connected disability. Social Security disability is available only to claimants under full retirement age. Some of these benefits must be repaid from a lawsuit recovery or are reduced by it, so we plan them together. Learn more about asbestos disability claims.
Can we choose not to sue?
Yes. Some South Carolina families pursue only trust claims and benefits and never file a lawsuit. We respect that decision. We will walk through every available path, explain what each one looks like, and help you choose the combination that fits your family — we will not pressure you into a court case you do not want.
Uncomfortable with the idea of a lawsuit? So was Clarence Borel. He spent 33 years as an insulator on the Gulf Coast and didn't believe in suing anyone — until he realized his coworkers would die the same way he was dying. His 1969 lawsuit helped establish the product-liability law that protects families today, and the cases that followed it eventually led to the bankruptcy trusts that pay claims now. Read his story.
How long do I have to file a South Carolina mesothelioma claim?
South Carolina's personal-injury deadline is three years. For asbestos claims, a South Carolina law says the clock doesn't start until the worker discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the asbestos disease, not when the exposure happened decades earlier. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. An earlier diagnosis of asbestosis or pleural scarring does not start the clock for mesothelioma in South Carolina, but symptoms or test results that would have led a reasonable person to see a doctor can, so call us right away.
After a death. The family's wrongful-death claim must be filed within three years from the date of death. The estate's separate survival claim, for the worker's own medical bills, lost earnings, and pain and suffering, keeps the worker's own deadline, paused for eight months after the death, so it may run out sooner. South Carolina allows a death claim only where the worker, had he lived, could have brought the claim himself.
Claims against builders and material suppliers. A separate South Carolina law cuts off claims about the condition of a building or other improvement to property eight years after the work was substantially completed. It doesn't apply to an illness caused by exposure to a harmful substance over time that couldn't have been discovered when it happened, which is how asbestos disease develops.
Workers' compensation has its own deadlines: the employer must generally be told within 90 days, and a claim must be filed with the Workers' Compensation Commission within two years after the worker is definitively diagnosed and told of the diagnosis.
Call 833-4-ASBESTOS — a free case review takes about fifteen minutes.
Legal detail: South Carolina filing deadlines
Personal injury — 3 years. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530(5) (three years for "any injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract"); § 15-3-535: such actions "must be commenced within three years after the person knew or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known that he had a cause of action." The test is whether a person of common knowledge and experience would have been on notice that some right of his had been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist. A federal court applying it in a smoking case refused to start the clock from an earlier chest X-ray that the treating physician read as bronchitis. Little v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 243 F. Supp. 2d 480 (D.S.C. 2001).
Asbestos accrual and separate diseases. S.C. Code Ann. § 44-135-110 (2006 Act No. 303): "with respect to any asbestos or silica claim not barred as of the effective date of this chapter, the limitations period shall not begin to run until the exposed person or claimant discovers, or through the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, that the exposed person or claimant is physically impaired as set forth in this chapter by an asbestos- or silica-related condition" (subsection (A)). A claim for a nonmalignant condition "shall be a distinct cause of action" from a claim for asbestos-related cancer, and resolving the first does not affect the second (subsection (B)).
Wrongful death — 3 years from death. § 15-3-530(6): an action under §§ 15-51-10 to 15-51-60, "the period to begin to run upon the death of the person on account of whose death the action is brought." The death action lies where the act "is such as would, if death had not ensued, have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof." § 15-51-10.
Survival. Claims for injuries to the person "shall survive both to and against the personal or real representative" (§ 15-5-90). The survival claim is the worker's own claim and keeps its own three-year period. "The running of any statute of limitations on a cause of action belonging to a decedent which had not been barred as of the date of his death is suspended during the eight months following the decedent's death but resumes thereafter unless otherwise tolled" (§ 62-3-109). A wrongful-death judgment does not bar the survival claim; they are separate causes of action. Grainger v. Greenville, Spartanburg & Anderson Railway Co., 101 S.C. 399, 85 S.E. 968 (1915). The wrongful-death article does not apply where the worker's own action "has proceeded to trial and final judgment before his or her death" (§ 15-51-60).
Improvement repose — 8 years, with a toxic-exposure exception. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-640: "No actions to recover damages based upon or arising out of the defective or unsafe condition of an improvement to real property may be brought more than eight years after substantial completion of the improvement," including actions for personal injury or death and actions "against owners or manufacturers of components, or against any person furnishing materials." But the limitation "may not be asserted as a defense to an action for personal injury, including a personal injury resulting in death," that is "by its nature not discoverable in the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of its occurrence" and "the result of ingestion of or exposure to some toxic or harmful or injury producing substance, element, or particle, including radiation, over a period of time as opposed to resulting from a sudden and fortuitous trauma" (§ 15-3-670(C)). Nor may it be asserted by a possessor who knew or should have known of the condition, or by a person guilty of fraud, gross negligence or recklessness, or who concealed the cause of action (§ 15-3-670(A)).
Warranty. Six years; a warranty claim "accrues ... when the breach is or should have been discovered" (§ 36-2-725).
Tolling. Minors and persons who are insane when the claim accrues (§ 15-3-40, with limits).
Workers' compensation. For occupational disease, the two-year claim period "does not begin to run until the employee concerned has been diagnosed definitively as having an occupational disease and has been notified of the diagnosis" (§ 42-15-40). Notice to the employer: immediately, and no compensation is payable unless notice is given within ninety days, unless the commission accepts a reasonable excuse and finds the employer was not prejudiced (§ 42-15-20).
Who can be sued in a South Carolina asbestos case?
A typical South Carolina mesothelioma case has many defendants, because asbestos exposure happened across many different products, employers, and worksites over a career.
Product manufacturers and suppliers
The companies that made and sold the asbestos insulation, gaskets, packing, refractory cement, joint compound, brake linings, and other asbestos-containing products handled at South Carolina shipyards, mills, power plants, and military bases, and that are still in business. South Carolina's strict-liability statute makes a seller of a defective, unreasonably dangerous product liable even if it used all possible care, but it covers only products put on the market after July 9, 1974; for older products, the claim is negligence. South Carolina courts require proof that the worker was exposed to each company's product often enough, regularly enough, and close enough to where he worked for it to be a substantial factor in causing the disease.
Premises owners and site operators
The private companies that owned the mills, chemical plants, and power stations where an outside contractor's employees were exposed. A site owner may argue that it was the worker's "statutory employer" because the contractor's work was part of the owner's own business, which would limit the worker to workers' compensation. In 2021 the South Carolina Supreme Court rejected that defense for an outside contractor's maintenance worker at a Spartanburg fiber plant, but each case depends on its facts. A worker can't sue his own employer this way, and Navy bases and other federal installations are not sued as property owners.
Asbestos bankruptcy trusts
Where a company filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust, recovery comes through the trust rather than the courtroom. Most of the South Carolina worksites on the trusts' lists appear on several trusts' lists.
Employers
South Carolina workers' compensation is usually the only remedy against the worker's own employer. The exception for intentional injury requires proof that the employer deliberately or specifically intended to injure the worker, and these claims rarely succeed. If a worker who receives comp doesn't sue the other companies within one year after the comp insurer accepts the claim, the insurer can take over the right to sue them after giving written notice, so we watch that date closely.
Legal detail: South Carolina product liability, premises liability, and workers' compensation
Strict products liability. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-73-10 (adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A, whose comments are the chapter's legislative intent, § 15-73-30): a seller of a product "in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer" is liable for physical harm "although ... [t]he seller has exercised all possible care." Defense: "If the user or consumer discovers the defect and is aware of the danger, and nevertheless proceeds unreasonably to make use of the product and is injured by it, he is barred from recovery." § 15-73-20. Strict liability became South Carolina law with 1974 Act No. 1184, effective July 9, 1974, and does not reach a product placed in the stream of commerce before then. Schall v. Sturm, Ruger Co., 278 S.C. 646, 300 S.E.2d 735 (1983); Hatfield v. Atlas Enterprises, Inc., 274 S.C. 247, 262 S.E.2d 900 (1980). Negligence and implied-warranty claims are also available.
Causation. The South Carolina Supreme Court adopted the "frequency, regularity, and proximity test" of Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986): "there must be evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked." Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc., 373 S.C. 179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007). It reaffirmed that substantial-factor test in a mesothelioma case in Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc., Op. No. 28193 (S.C. Feb. 28, 2024).
Premises liability and statutory employers. An owner that undertakes work that "is a part of his trade, business or occupation" and contracts it out is liable for the contractor's workers' compensation (S.C. Code Ann. § 42-1-400), and comp then bars a lawsuit against the owner. In Keene v. CNA Holdings, LLC, Op. No. 28052 (S.C. Aug. 11, 2021) (3–2), the Court held that a contractor's maintenance and repair worker at the Hoechst Fibers polyester plant in Spartanburg, who later died of mesothelioma, was not the plant owner's statutory employee, applying the statute's purpose "to prevent owners and contractors from subcontracting out their work to avoid liability" (quoting Glass v. Dow Chemical Co., 325 S.C. 198, 482 S.E.2d 49 (1997)); see Olmstead v. Shakespeare, 354 S.C. 421, 581 S.E.2d 483 (2003).
Workers' compensation exclusivity. S.C. Code Ann. § 42-1-540: the comp remedies "shall exclude all other rights and remedies of such employee, his personal representative, parents, dependents or next of kin as against his employer." Occupational disease is treated as an injury by accident (§ 42-11-40). The exception for intentional injury requires a deliberate or specific intent to injure. Edens v. Bellini, 359 S.C. 433, 597 S.E.2d 863 (Ct. App. 2004).
Third-party claims, the lien, and assignment. S.C. Code Ann. § 42-1-560: a worker may take comp and sue third parties; the carrier has a lien on the recovery for compensation paid or to be paid, less its share of fees and expenses (subsection (b)). If the worker has not sued or settled with the third party within one year after the carrier accepts liability or pays under an award, the right of action passes by assignment to the carrier, no sooner than twenty days after the carrier's written notice (subsection (c)). A settlement for less than the compensation due, made without the carrier's written consent, is invalid as against the carrier (subsection (f)).
Government-contractor defense. Manufacturers of equipment built to Navy specifications often raise the federal government-contractor defense under Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988): reasonably precise specifications approved by the United States, conformity, and a warning of dangers known to the supplier but not the government. Such cases are often removed to federal court.
Successor companies. The Successor Asbestos-Related Liability Fairness Act (S.C. Code Ann. §§ 15-81-110 to -160, 2006 Act No. 280) limits the asbestos liability of a corporation that became a successor by merger or consolidation before January 1, 1972 to the fair market value of the transferor's total gross assets at the time of the merger or consolidation. It does not protect a successor that continued the same asbestos business, and it does not limit workers' compensation.
What compensation can a South Carolina mesothelioma case recover?
South Carolina does not cap compensatory damages in asbestos cases. Punitive damages are capped, with exceptions.
Personal-injury compensation
- Medical expenses, past and future. South Carolina follows the collateral source rule: the companies can't reduce what they owe by showing that insurance or Medicare paid a smaller amount than the bills, though Medicare and some insurers can be repaid from the recovery.
- Lost wages and lost earning capacity, past and future.
- Pain, suffering, and mental anguish, past and future.
- Loss of enjoyment of life.
- Loss of consortium for a spouse.
- Punitive damages in some cases. South Carolina law caps punitive damages at the greater of three times the compensatory damages or $500,000, a figure adjusted for inflation each year ($739,245 for 2026). The judge raises the cap to four times or $2 million if the company's conduct was motivated primarily by unreasonable financial gain and its managers knew of or approved the danger and the high likelihood of injury, and removes it only in narrow situations, such as intent to harm. Punitive damages require clear and convincing proof that each company's own conduct was willful, wanton, or reckless; they aren't available on a strict-liability claim alone, and a company can ask that they be tried separately.
Wrongful-death compensation
After a death, South Carolina allows two claims. The wrongful-death claim compensates the spouse and children (or, if there are none, the parents, then the heirs) for their own losses and is divided among them as the intestacy laws provide. The survival claim belongs to the estate and recovers the worker's medical bills, lost earnings, and pain and suffering before death. Punitive damages can be sought in both, subject to the same cap. A court must approve any settlement of either claim.
Legal detail: South Carolina damages and wrongful death
No cap on compensatory damages. South Carolina's noneconomic damages limits apply only to medical-malpractice claims (S.C. Code Ann. § 15-32-220); claims against the state and its subdivisions are subject to the Tort Claims Act's separate overall limits.
Collateral source rule. "[C]ompensation received by an injured party from a source wholly independent of the wrongdoer will not reduce the damages owed by the wrongdoer," and evidence of the amount actually paid on medical bills is excluded when offered to challenge the reasonableness of the billed charges. Covington v. George, 359 S.C. 100, 597 S.E.2d 142 (2004).
Punitive damages. Clear and convincing evidence that the harm "was the result of the defendant's wilful, wanton, or reckless conduct" (S.C. Code Ann. § 15-32-520(D); § 15-33-135). They must be prayed for in the complaint without stating an amount (§ 15-32-510). On any defendant's request, the trial is bifurcated before the same jury (§ 15-32-520(A)); in a multi-defendant case the award "must be specific to each defendant" (§ 15-32-520(G)). Punitive damages are not recoverable in a cause of action based solely on strict liability. Barnwell v. Barber-Colman Co., 301 S.C. 534, 393 S.E.2d 162 (1989). Cap: the greater of three times compensatory damages "awarded to each claimant" or $500,000 (§ 15-32-530(A)), adjusted each year for inflation under § 15-32-530(D), effective on publication in the State Register ($739,245 for 2026, Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office memorandum of February 3, 2026); four times or $2,000,000 if the trial court finds the conduct "was motivated primarily by unreasonable financial gain" and that its unreasonably dangerous nature and high likelihood of injury "was known or approved by the managing agent, director, officer, or the person responsible for making policy decisions," or that the conduct could subject the defendant to a felony conviction (§ 15-32-530(B)); no cap if the court finds intent to harm, a felony plea or conviction for the same conduct, or impairment by alcohol or drugs (§ 15-32-530(C)). The cap is not disclosed to the jury. The article applies to actions accruing on or after January 1, 2012 (2011 Act No. 52, § 7).
Wrongful death. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-51-10 et seq. The action is brought by the executor or administrator for the benefit of the spouse and children, or if none, the parents, or if none, the heirs (§ 15-51-20). "[T]he jury may give damages, including exemplary damages when the wrongful act, neglect, or default was the result of recklessness, wilfulness, or malice," divided as in intestacy (§ 15-51-40). Any settlement of a wrongful-death or survival action must be approved by a probate court, circuit court or federal district court (§§ 15-51-41, 15-51-42).
Survival. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-5-90. The estate recovers the decedent's own pre-death damages. Grainger, above.
Costs and offers of judgment. Under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-35-400 and SCRCP 68, if a defendant's written offer of judgment is rejected and the verdict is not more favorable to the plaintiff, the plaintiff pays the court costs from the date of the offer, and the judgment is reduced by eight percent interest on the verdict from the date of the offer. A plaintiff's rejected offer can work the other way: if the verdict is at least as favorable to the plaintiff, the defendant pays costs and eight percent interest from the date of the offer.
What evidence do we need to prove a South Carolina asbestos case?
You do not need to gather everything before calling. We rebuild the exposure history using our database, military records, Social Security earnings histories, union records, and product-identification resources. Here is the picture of what helps and what we do when something is missing:
| Evidence | Why it helps | What if you do not have it? |
|---|---|---|
| Pathology report confirming mesothelioma | Establishes the diagnosis and the disease type. South Carolina also requires a doctor's report linking the disease to asbestos to be filed with the lawsuit. | We obtain the records from the treating hospital with a signed authorization and work with the doctors on the report. |
| Work history — employers, dates, job titles | Maps exposure to specific manufacturers' products and worksites. | Social Security earnings records, union records, and DD-214 military records reconstruct it. |
| DD-214 (for veterans) | Confirms military service, dates, and ratings — essential for VA claims and Navy exposure. | We request a replacement from the National Personnel Records Center. |
| Coworker names | Coworkers can identify the asbestos products used at a site. | Our database often has corroborating worker statements from the same facility. |
| Product names or invoices | Speeds up the case. | Almost never available — product identification is built from facility records, our database, and industry research. |
| Medical records and bills | Document damages and future-care needs. | Released by the treating providers with a signed authorization. |
| Marriage and birth certificates | Establish family relationships for consortium and wrongful-death claims. | Obtainable from the state vital records office. |
A general work history and a diagnosis are usually enough to start. In the case itself, the specific products and companies have to be identified and proved, which is why that reconstruction work matters.
Legal detail: South Carolina's asbestos claims procedure
Asbestos and Silica Claims Procedure Act. S.C. Code Ann. § 44-135-10 et seq. (2006 Act No. 303). No asbestos claim may be placed on a trial roster, tried, or proceed to discovery without a prima facie showing served on each defendant (§ 44-135-50(A)). For mesothelioma, that is a report by a physician board certified in pulmonary medicine, occupational medicine, internal medicine, oncology or pathology concluding that the person has been diagnosed with mesothelioma and that, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, asbestos exposure was a proximate cause, and that the findings were not more probably the result of other causes revealed by the person's employment and medical history (§ 44-135-50(A)(1)); a conclusion that findings are "consistent with" or "compatible with" mesothelioma is not enough. The report and test results must be filed with the complaint; if they are missing or inadequate, a defendant may file a notice of appearance instead of an answer, and the claimant has ninety days after receiving the answer or notice to supply them (§ 44-135-80(A)). The evidence "must not be obtained under the condition that the exposed person retains legal services in exchange for the examination, testing, or screening" (§ 44-135-50(C)(3)). A claimant with mesothelioma may ask for an expedited trial date, no sooner than 120 days after the order and six months after filing (§ 44-135-80(B)). The act does not affect trust claims (§ 44-135-90).
Asbestos docket. By order of the Chief Justice of May 28, 2019, a Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes oversees "all asbestosis and asbestos litigation filed within the state court system" on a statewide basis, with authority to monitor the docket, hold pretrial hearings, issue scheduling orders and assign cases to designated circuit judges. Cases on the docket follow standard mandatory discovery procedures and scheduling orders. Welch v. Atlas Turner, Inc., Op. No. 28284 (S.C. May 21, 2025).
Trust disclosure. No South Carolina statute requiring asbestos plaintiffs to disclose trust claims was found in the Code of Laws.
How does South Carolina divide responsibility when many asbestos companies were involved?
Modified comparative negligence. If a company argues that the worker was partly careless, a negligence recovery is reduced by the worker's share and barred only if the worker's share is greater than that of all the defendants combined. On strict product-liability claims, South Carolina's statute bars recovery only if the worker discovered the defect, knew of the danger, and still unreasonably used the product. The South Carolina Supreme Court has held that ordinary comparative negligence doesn't reduce strict-liability awards for injuries that a vehicle defect made worse in a crash, but it hasn't decided the question for other products.
Shared responsibility. In South Carolina, a company found less than half at fault for the illness usually pays only its own share of the damages. A company found 50% or more at fault, or whose conduct was willful, wanton, or reckless, can be made to pay the whole verdict. In asbestos cases the jury divides fault among the companies on trial, not companies that settled or went bankrupt, and settlements with other companies are credited against the verdict. Trust payments can also affect a verdict, depending on how they are treated.
Legal detail: comparative negligence, joint and several liability, and settlement credits
Modified comparative negligence. Nelson v. Concrete Supply Co., 303 S.C. 243, 399 S.E.2d 783 (1991): a plaintiff in a negligence action may recover damages if his negligence is not greater than that of the defendant, reduced by his share; with multiple defendants, the plaintiff's negligence is compared with the combined negligence of all defendants. Implied assumption of risk is no longer a separate complete defense; it is part of the comparative-negligence analysis. Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property Regime, 333 S.C. 71, 508 S.E.2d 565 (1998).
Strict liability. The statutory defense is § 15-73-20. Donze v. General Motors, LLC, 420 S.C. 8, 800 S.E.2d 479 (2017), held that comparative negligence does not apply in crashworthiness cases brought in strict liability or warranty, noting that the defenses to those claims are statutory; Wickersham v. Ford Motor Co., Op. No. 28003 (S.C. Dec. 9, 2020), extended that to a plaintiff's non-tortious conduct in a crashworthiness case.
Joint and several liability. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-38-15(A): joint and several liability "does not apply to any defendant whose conduct is determined to be less than fifty percent of the total fault for the indivisible damages," and such a defendant is liable only for its percentage. That protection does not apply to a defendant "whose conduct is determined to be wilful, wanton, reckless, or intentional," who "shall be jointly and severally liable for all damages" (§ 15-38-15(F)). The section was enacted by 2005 Act No. 27 for causes of action arising on or after July 1, 2005, and rewritten by 2025 Act No. 42 (H.3430), § 1, for causes of action "arising or accruing after January 1, 2026" (§ 11).
Fault of nonparties. Before the 2025 amendment, the jury apportioned fault only among the plaintiff and the defendants at trial, not settled or absent parties. Smith v. Tiffany, 419 S.C. 548, 799 S.E.2d 479 (2017). The 2025 amendment lets the jury allocate fault to a disclosed nondefendant tortfeasor (§ 15-38-15(G)), but a nondefendant "shall not be added to the verdict form if ... the causes of action involve strict liability" or "the causes of action involve asbestos" (§ 15-38-15(H)(4), (5)). A defendant may still argue that others caused the harm (§ 15-38-15(D)).
Settlement credits. A good-faith release "reduces the claim against the others to the extent of any amount stipulated by the release or the covenant, or in the amount of the consideration paid for it, whichever is the greater" (S.C. Code Ann. § 15-38-50); for claims accruing after January 1, 2026, a setoff for a settlement with a tortfeasor not on the verdict form is applied in proportion to each defendant's percentage of liability (§ 15-38-15(E)). How pretrial settlements are allocated among the wrongful-death, survival and consortium claims for setoff is for the trial court's discretion. Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC, Op. No. 28233 (S.C. Aug. 21, 2024); Glenn v. 3M Co., Op. No. 5975 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 5, 2023).
Contribution. S.C. Code Ann. §§ 15-38-20 to -40.
How trust claims, lawsuits, and benefits can work together
| Path | What it pays | How long it takes |
|---|---|---|
| Asbestos trust claims | Defined-value payments from each qualifying trust based on diagnosis and exposure history. No lawsuit required. | Months from filing. |
| Civil lawsuit | Medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment, loss of consortium, and sometimes punitive damages from the companies still in business. | Twelve to twenty-four months is common for mesothelioma cases; a mesothelioma claimant can ask for an expedited trial date. |
| South Carolina workers' compensation | Wage-loss and medical benefits for asbestos disease from the employer. | Claim within two years after the definitive diagnosis. Repaid from a lawsuit recovery. |
| EEOICPA Part E | Federal compensation for Department of Energy contractor workers, including at the Savannah River Site. | Cash payments are capped at $250,000 and reduced by state workers' compensation (other than medical care) and by lawsuit and trust recoveries for the same illness. |
| VA service-connected disability | Monthly compensation for veterans whose mesothelioma is linked to military asbestos exposure. | Not reduced by a civil or trust recovery. |
| FECA | Federal workers' compensation for civilian employees of federal facilities, including the Charleston Naval Shipyard. | Must be repaid from a recovery against the companies. |
| Social Security disability | Monthly benefits for claimants under full retirement age who can't work. | Workers' compensation can offset it. |
These paths can often be pursued together, but they interact. Workers' compensation and FECA must be repaid from a civil recovery, EEOICPA is reduced by it, and a worker eligible for both VA and FECA for the same illness generally has to choose. The order of trust claims, benefits, and any lawsuit is decided case by case with the trial team.
South Carolina shipyard, Navy, and federal-facility exposure
South Carolina's federal-facility footprint is large and directly relevant to many asbestos cases.
- Charleston Naval Shipyard (North Charleston) — Navy ship construction, overhaul, and repair from 1901 until it closed in 1996. The trusts' lists document it on at least 14 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Its civilian shipyard workers were federal employees covered by FECA, which is their only remedy against the United States; claims against the product makers remain.
- Savannah River Site (Aiken, Barnwell and Allendale counties) — a Department of Energy nuclear complex built in the early 1950s and run by Du Pont until 1989, then by other contractors. Contractor and subcontractor employees may qualify for EEOICPA Part E, and their claims against their employer run through South Carolina workers' compensation. Department of Energy federal employees have FECA instead.
- Military installations — MCRD Parris Island, MCAS Beaufort, Joint Base Charleston and Naval Weapons Station Charleston, Fort Jackson at Columbia, Shaw AFB at Sumter, and McEntire Joint National Guard Base at Eastover.
Federal benefit pathways. Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Army, and South Carolina National Guard veterans with in-service asbestos exposure may pursue VA service-connected disability; the VA has no automatic presumption for asbestos diseases, but it treats in-service asbestos exposure as likely for many Navy ratings, and a claim still needs a diagnosis and a doctor's opinion linking the disease to service. A trust or civil recovery doesn't reduce VA disability. Federal civilian employees have FECA, which must be repaid from a recovery against the companies, and a worker eligible for both VA and FECA for the same illness generally has to choose. The Navy and military bases themselves are not sued as property owners; a family member's own illness from dust brought home is a separate injury, and any claim against the United States goes through the Federal Tort Claims Act, which has its own, shorter deadlines. Social Security disability is available only to claimants under full retirement age.
Legal detail: federal programs and Navy cases
FECA. Exclusive remedy against the United States for federal employees (5 U.S.C. § 8116(c)); a claim must be filed within three years, which for a latent disability runs from when the employee has a compensable disability and knows or should know of its link to the employment (§ 8122(a), (b)); a third-party recovery must be refunded and future benefits credited (§ 8132); FECA and VA benefits for the same injury generally require an election (§ 8116(b)).
Longshore Act. The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act excludes U.S. government employees (33 U.S.C. § 903(b)), so it does not cover the Charleston Naval Shipyard's civilian workforce. Private shipyard and ship-repair employees may be covered; for them, compensation is the exclusive remedy against the employer (§ 905(a)), settling a third-party claim for less than the compensation due without the prior written approval of the employer and its insurer forfeits benefits (§ 933(g)), accepting compensation under an award assigns the third-party claim to the employer unless suit is brought within six months (§ 933(b)), and the employer takes a credit against the recovery (§ 933(f)).
EEOICPA. Part E covers Department of Energy contractor and subcontractor employees for illnesses caused by toxic exposure at a covered DOE facility (42 U.S.C. § 7385s et seq.). Cash payments are capped at $250,000 (§ 7385s-12) and reduced by state workers' compensation for the same illness, other than medical and vocational-rehabilitation benefits, after the costs of obtaining it (§ 7385s-11); lawsuit and trust recoveries for the same exposure are offset (§ 7385).
Federal Tort Claims Act. A household member's own claim against the United States must first be presented in writing to the responsible agency within two years after it accrues, and suit must follow within six months after the agency mails a final denial (28 U.S.C. §§ 2401(b), 2675(a)).
What happens after you call?
A free case review is a conversation, not a commitment to file a lawsuit.
- The first call. Usually fifteen to twenty minutes. We listen. We ask basic questions about diagnosis, work history, and military service. No documents required.
- We send a short authorization so we can request medical records, employment records, military records, and Social Security earnings histories.
- We rebuild the exposure history using our database of 200,000+ verified asbestos sites, including all of the more than 1,000 South Carolina entries on the asbestos trusts' lists.
- We identify every available compensation source — trust claims, civil case defendants, workers' compensation, federal programs (EEOICPA, FECA, VA), and Social Security.
- We plan the trust claims, any lawsuit, and benefit applications together. The order is decided case by case with the trial team.
- If a lawsuit is right for your family, we file it with the doctor's report South Carolina requires, in the appropriate South Carolina court or in federal court.
- We keep you informed in plain English. No surprises, no jargon-filled letters.
Call 833-4-ASBESTOS when you are ready.
How South Carolina's laws may work in practice
Eugene is a 75-year-old retired civilian shipyard worker from North Charleston. From 1969 through 1996 he worked as a boilermaker and insulator at the Charleston Naval Shipyard, a federal civil-service employee, mostly on submarine and surface-ship overhauls. His job involved pipe-insulation replacement on propulsion piping and steam systems, boiler-tube replacement and refractory work in marine boilers, gasket and packing replacement on shipboard valves and pumps, and the broad range of asbestos-containing products used across Navy ship overhaul work through the 1980s. When the shipyard closed in 1996, Eugene retired. He had no significant health complaints until late 2025, when he developed shortness of breath, persistent chest pain, and unexplained weight loss. In March 2026 a VATS biopsy confirmed pleural mesothelioma of the sarcomatoid histological subtype — a particularly aggressive presentation.
For Eugene and his family, several things are happening at once. South Carolina's three-year deadline is counted, to be safe, from his March 2026 diagnosis, so the case should be filed well before March 2029. The trusts' lists document at least 14 trusts at the Charleston Naval Shipyard, including Johns-Manville, and his trust claims are planned with the trial team. A lawsuit names the companies still in business whose insulation, gaskets, packing, refractory, and equipment he worked with or around, and each company's product has to be linked to his exposure by how often, how regularly, and how close he worked with it. Strict liability covers only the products put on the market after July 9, 1974; for products from his earlier years, the claim is negligence. It is filed with the doctor's report South Carolina requires, and because he has mesothelioma he can ask the court for an expedited trial date. Companies that made equipment to Navy specifications may raise a federal defense and move the case to federal court. Eugene has a FECA claim as a former federal employee, with its own deadline, generally three years from when he knew or should have known the illness was work-related, and FECA is repaid from what the lawsuit recovers; the Navy itself isn't sued. A company found 50% or more at fault, or whose conduct was willful, wanton, or reckless, can be made to pay the whole verdict. Punitive damages are possible only on clear and convincing proof of a company's own willful, wanton, or reckless conduct, not on a strict-liability claim alone, and are capped; the cap rises to four times the compensatory damages or $2 million if the court finds a company acted primarily for unreasonable financial gain and its managers knew of or approved the danger and the high likelihood of injury. Eugene's wife and children lived with the dust from his work clothes for decades. As part of our representation, we offer free asbestos health screening to family members of every client who may have been exposed at home, whether or not they ever hire us. The screening is a chest X-ray read by a B-reader, with a CT scan if needed; it looks for asbestos-related changes in the lungs and isn't a diagnosis or a reliable way to find mesothelioma early. If a family member is later diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, they may have their own claims. If Eugene passes away during the case, his estate's personal representative continues it as a survival claim, his wife and children have a wrongful-death claim with three years from his death to bring it, and a court must approve any settlement.
Legal analysis of this hypothetical
Deadline. Three years under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 15-3-530(5) and 15-3-535 and § 44-135-110(A), counted from the March 2026 diagnosis to be safe. The 1996 closure is irrelevant to limitations.
Claims. Strict products liability (§ 15-73-10) for products placed in commerce after July 9, 1974 (Schall), and negligence against the solvent manufacturers and suppliers of the products he worked with or around, each proved under the frequency, regularity and proximity test (Henderson; Edwards). Prima facie physician report with the complaint and an expedited-trial request (§§ 44-135-50(A)(1), 44-135-80). Government-contractor defense (Boyle) and federal-officer removal expected for Navy-specification equipment. The companies that went through asbestos bankruptcies are trust claims only.
Federal coordination. FECA as a former civil-service employee (South Carolina comp excludes federal employees, § 42-1-360(8)), his exclusive remedy against the United States (5 U.S.C. § 8116(c)), with the § 8132 refund from the third-party recovery. No Longshore Act (§ 903(b)). No claim against the Navy. No military service described, so no VA claim. No SSDI: he is past full retirement age.
Allocation and damages. Modified comparative negligence (Nelson) on negligence counts; § 15-73-20 on strict liability. If his claim accrued after January 1, 2026, which a defendant may dispute because his symptoms began in late 2025, amended § 15-38-15 applies: several liability below 50%, joint and several at 50% or more or for willful, wanton or reckless conduct; no nondefendants on the verdict form (§ 15-38-15(H)(5)); settlements credited under §§ 15-38-15(E) and 15-38-50. No cap on compensatory damages. Punitive damages under §§ 15-32-510 to -530 on the negligence and willful-conduct counts only (Barnwell), company by company, with the § 15-32-530(B)(1) cap exception decided by the court.
Trust filings. The Charleston Naval Shipyard appears on at least 14 trusts' lists, including Johns-Manville (A.P. Green, Armstrong World Industries, Babcock & Wilcox, Combustion Engineering, DII Industries (Halliburton), Eagle-Picher, Fibreboard, Flexitallic, GAF, Owens Corning, Owens-Illinois, Pittsburgh Corning, Yarway). Order and timing decided case by case with the trial team.
Family. Free screening, not conditioned on hiring the firm (§ 44-135-50(C)(3)). A household member's own claim would be a separate injury; no South Carolina appellate decision on take-home duty was found.
Survival and wrongful death. If he dies while the case is pending, the action survives (§ 15-5-90) and his personal representative continues it; the wrongful-death claim for his wife and children (§§ 15-51-10, -20, -40) runs three years from death (§ 15-3-530(6)), unless his own case has gone to trial and final judgment before death (§ 15-51-60); settlements need court approval (§§ 15-51-41, -42).
This example is general. Every case depends on the diagnosis, exposure history, dates, defendants, applicable law, and available evidence.
Why families choose our firm
Our firm has recovered over $400 million for asbestos clients nationally. Our South Carolina work is supported by our proprietary database of 200,000+ verified asbestos exposure sites built over more than a decade — including all of the more than 1,000 South Carolina entries on the asbestos trusts' lists, from 27 trusts. We routinely get claims approved by many asbestos trusts.
For South Carolina families, that translates into:
- No investigation lag. We often know on the first call which trusts apply to your worksite — including the Charleston Naval Shipyard, the DuPont May Plant in Camden, the Westvaco and International Paper mills, Duke Power's Oconee station, the Savannah River Site, and the Upstate and Midlands textile and fiber plants.
- Case strategy built for South Carolina law. We work with South Carolina's three-year deadline, its asbestos claims procedure and statewide asbestos docket, its comparative-fault and joint-liability rules, and its punitive damages cap.
- Filing during life. A case filed while the worker is alive preserves his own testimony. If he passes away during the case, his estate continues it and the family's wrongful-death claim follows.
- Benefits coordination. Workers' compensation, EEOICPA, FECA, VA, and Social Security are coordinated case by case with the trial team.
- Remote case handling. Most of our South Carolina clients never come to an office. Home visits available across the state.
- No fee unless we recover. Contingent fee. A family that rejects a formal offer of judgment and later wins less at trial can be ordered to pay some of the other side's costs and lose interest on the verdict, so we discuss every settlement offer with the family before anyone responds to it.
Court decisions: 30 asbestos cases from South Carolina courts
Frequently asked questions
What is the statute of limitations for mesothelioma in South Carolina?
Three years. For asbestos claims, the clock starts when the disease was discovered, or reasonably should have been, not at the original exposure. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. An earlier diagnosis of asbestosis or pleural scarring does not start the clock for mesothelioma in South Carolina, but symptoms or test results that would have led a reasonable person to see a doctor can, so call us right away.
What is the deadline if my loved one already passed away?
The wrongful-death claim must be filed within three years from the date of death. The estate's separate survival claim for the worker's own suffering, medical bills and lost earnings keeps the worker's own three-year deadline, paused for eight months after the death, so it may run out sooner. Call as soon as you can.
Can my family still call if my loved one already died?
Yes. South Carolina families regularly bring a wrongful-death claim for the spouse and children and a survival claim for the estate, covering the worker's own suffering before death. Both are brought by the estate's personal representative, and a court must approve any settlement.
Do I need to know the asbestos product names?
No. Almost no client knows the product names. We rebuild the product identification from employment records, military records, coworker information, facility records, and our exposure database.
Do I need old employment records before calling?
No. Social Security earnings records, union records, and military DD-214 records reconstruct the work history. Bring whatever you have, and we will fill in the rest.
Can an adult child call for a parent?
Yes — most calls come from a spouse or an adult child. We will work with whoever in the family is best able to gather information.
Will we have to file a lawsuit?
Not necessarily. Some South Carolina families recover only through asbestos bankruptcy trusts and benefits without filing a lawsuit. We walk through every available path and never pressure a family into a court case they do not want.
Are trust claims separate from lawsuits?
Yes. A trust claim is a paper-and-evidence filing against a bankrupt company's asbestos trust, not a courtroom trial, and it does not require a lawsuit. Trust payments can affect a verdict, depending on how they are treated, so we plan trust claims and any lawsuit together.
Can I file a South Carolina claim if I no longer live in South Carolina?
Often yes. Many of our South Carolina clients moved out of state after retirement. A South Carolina court can usually hear claims about exposure that happened in South Carolina, though each company has to be one the court can reach. We handle it remotely.
What if the exposure happened at work?
That is the typical situation. South Carolina workers' compensation is usually the only remedy against the worker's own employer, with its own deadlines. Recovery in a lawsuit comes from the manufacturers of the asbestos products and, where an outside contractor's employee was exposed, sometimes the owner of the site.
What if the exposure happened through a spouse's work clothes?
A family member who became ill from dust brought home on a worker's clothes may have a claim of their own, but no South Carolina appellate court has decided whether a company owed household members a duty, so each claim is evaluated case by case. As part of our representation, we offer free asbestos health screening to family members of every client who may have been exposed at home, whether or not they ever hire us.
Are punitive damages available in South Carolina asbestos cases?
Sometimes. They require clear and convincing proof that a company's own conduct was willful, wanton, or reckless, and they aren't available on a strict-liability claim alone. South Carolina law caps them at the greater of three times the compensatory damages or $500,000, adjusted for inflation ($739,245 for 2026); the judge raises the cap to four times or $2 million if the company acted primarily for unreasonable financial gain and its managers knew of or approved the danger and the high likelihood of injury, and removes it only in narrow situations, such as intent to harm.
Are punitive damages available in wrongful death?
Yes. South Carolina's wrongful-death statute allows them when the death resulted from recklessness, willfulness, or malice, and the same cap applies.
What if I worked at Charleston Naval Shipyard?
The Charleston Naval Shipyard built and repaired Navy ships from 1901 until it closed in 1996, and it appears on at least 14 asbestos trusts' lists, including Johns-Manville. Its civilian workers were federal employees covered by FECA, which must be repaid from a recovery against the companies and has its own deadline, generally three years from when the worker knew or should have known the illness was work-related; the Navy isn't sued, but claims against the product makers remain. Navy veterans with in-service exposure may qualify for VA service-connected disability. The shipyard's closure doesn't affect a claim: the deadline runs from the illness, not the exposure.
What if I worked at the Savannah River Site?
The Savannah River Site appears on at least 9 asbestos trusts' lists, including Johns-Manville. Contractor and subcontractor workers may qualify for EEOICPA Part E, whose cash payments are capped at $250,000 and reduced by state workers' compensation (other than medical care) and by lawsuit and trust recoveries for the same illness. Their claims against their own employer run through South Carolina workers' compensation. We coordinate EEOICPA filings case by case with the trial team.
What if I worked at International Paper at Georgetown?
International Paper's Georgetown mill appears on at least 10 asbestos trusts' lists, including Johns-Manville (A.P. Green, Babcock & Wilcox, DII Industries (Halliburton), Eagle-Picher, Fibreboard, GAF, NARCO, Owens Corning, Owens-Illinois). Mill employees have workers' compensation against International Paper, not a lawsuit, but they can still bring trust claims and product claims against the companies that made the asbestos products.
What if I worked in the Upstate textile mills?
The Upstate textile belt — Greenville, Spartanburg, Anderson, and the surrounding mill villages — was for generations a center of American textile manufacturing. Mills such as Graniteville Company, Greenwood Mills, and Springs Cotton Mills appear on several asbestos trusts' lists, with exposure from boiler insulation, gasket and packing replacement on textile machinery, and steam systems.
Where will my South Carolina case be filed?
It depends on where the exposure happened and where the companies are based. South Carolina asbestos cases are handled on a statewide asbestos docket in the state circuit courts. Navy-equipment cases are often moved to the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.
Talk with a South Carolina mesothelioma lawyer
Whether your family is dealing with a new diagnosis, a very sick loved one, or a death from mesothelioma, we are ready to help you understand what is possible and what comes next.
You do not need to know the product names. You do not need to have all the records. You do not need to travel to our office. A spouse or adult child can call for the family.
Related resources
Sources and references
Statutes and rules
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-40 — Tolling for minors and persons who are insane.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530 — Three-year limitations period for personal injury (5) and wrongful death from the date of death (6).
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-535 — Discovery rule for personal injury claims.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-640 — Eight-year repose for improvements to real property, including component makers and material suppliers.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-670 — Exceptions to the improvement repose, including latent toxic-exposure injury.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-5-90 — Survival of actions.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-32-220 — Noneconomic damages limits in medical-malpractice actions only.
- S.C. Code Ann. §§ 15-32-510 to -540 — Punitive damages: pleading, bifurcation, clear and convincing standard, per-defendant awards, cap and exceptions.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-33-135 — Clear and convincing proof of punitive damages.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-35-400 — Offers of judgment.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-38-10 et seq. — South Carolina Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (§ 15-38-15, as amended by 2025 Act No. 42; §§ 15-38-20 to -40 contribution; § 15-38-50 releases).
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-51-10 et seq. — Wrongful death (§§ 15-51-10, -20, -40, -41, -42, -60).
- S.C. Code Ann. § 36-2-725 — Six-year warranty limitations period; accrual on discovery of the breach.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 62-3-109 — Eight-month suspension of a decedent's limitations period after death.
- S.C. Code Ann. §§ 15-73-10 to -30 — Strict products liability.
- S.C. Code Ann. §§ 15-81-110 to -160 — Successor Asbestos-Related Liability Fairness Act.
- S.C. Code Ann. §§ 42-1-360(8), 42-1-400, 42-1-540, 42-1-560 — Federal employees excluded; statutory employers; workers' compensation exclusivity; third-party actions, lien and assignment.
- S.C. Code Ann. §§ 42-11-10 to -90; 42-15-20, 42-15-40 — Occupational disease; notice and claim deadlines.
- S.C. Code Ann. § 44-135-10 et seq. — Asbestos and Silica Claims Procedure Act of 2006.
- 2025 Act No. 42 (H.3430) — Amended § 15-38-15 for causes of action arising or accruing after January 1, 2026.
- SCRCP 68 — Offers of judgment.
- Order of the Chief Justice, May 28, 2019 — Statewide administration of asbestos litigation.
- 5 U.S.C. §§ 8116, 8122, 8132 — FECA exclusivity, VA election, claim deadline, and third-party refunds.
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401(b), 2675(a) — Federal Tort Claims Act presentment and suit deadlines.
- 33 U.S.C. §§ 903, 905, 933 — Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act.
- 42 U.S.C. §§ 7385, 7385s et seq. — EEOICPA offsets and Part E (§ 7385s-11 state-comp coordination; § 7385s-12 $250,000 cap).
Cases
- Grainger v. Greenville, Spartanburg & Anderson Railway Co., 101 S.C. 399, 85 S.E. 968 (1915) — Wrongful death and survival are separate claims.
- Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986) — Frequency, regularity, and proximity.
- Hatfield v. Atlas Enterprises, Inc., 274 S.C. 247, 262 S.E.2d 900 (1980) — No strict liability in tort before the 1974 Act.
- Schall v. Sturm, Ruger Co., 278 S.C. 646, 300 S.E.2d 735 (1983) — No strict liability for products placed in commerce before July 9, 1974.
- Barnwell v. Barber-Colman Co., 301 S.C. 534, 393 S.E.2d 162 (1989) — No punitive damages on strict liability alone.
- Nelson v. Concrete Supply Co., 303 S.C. 243, 399 S.E.2d 783 (1991) — Modified comparative negligence.
- Glass v. Dow Chemical Co., 325 S.C. 198, 482 S.E.2d 49 (1997) — Purpose of the statutory employer rule.
- Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property Regime, 333 S.C. 71, 508 S.E.2d 565 (1998) — Assumption of risk within comparative negligence.
- Little v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 243 F. Supp. 2d 480 (D.S.C. 2001) — Applying the § 15-3-535 discovery rule to a latent disease.
- Olmstead v. Shakespeare, 354 S.C. 421, 581 S.E.2d 483 (2003) — Statutory employer.
- Covington v. George, 359 S.C. 100, 597 S.E.2d 142 (2004) — Collateral source rule; amounts actually paid excluded.
- Edens v. Bellini, 359 S.C. 433, 597 S.E.2d 863 (Ct. App. 2004) — Intentional-injury exception to comp exclusivity.
- Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc., 373 S.C. 179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) — Adoption of the Lohrmann test.
- Donze v. General Motors, LLC, 420 S.C. 8, 800 S.E.2d 479 (2017) — No comparative negligence in crashworthiness cases.
- Smith v. Tiffany, 419 S.C. 548, 799 S.E.2d 479 (2017) — No allocation of fault to nonparties before 2026.
- Wickersham v. Ford Motor Co., Op. No. 28003 (S.C. 2020) — Crashworthiness; proximate cause.
- Keene v. CNA Holdings, LLC, Op. No. 28052 (S.C. 2021) — Contractor's maintenance worker not the plant owner's statutory employee.
- Glenn v. 3M Co., Op. No. 5975 (S.C. Ct. App. 2023) — Allocation of settlements for setoff.
- Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc., Op. No. 28193 (S.C. 2024) — Substantial-factor causation reaffirmed.
- Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC, Op. No. 28233 (S.C. 2024) — Allocation of settlements for setoff.
- Welch v. Atlas Turner, Inc., Op. No. 28284 (S.C. 2025) — South Carolina asbestos docket.
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988) — Government-contractor defense.
Last reviewed: November 2026. The Law Offices of Justinian C. Lane, Esq. — PLLC | Round Rock, TX · Mesa, AZ · Redmond, WA. We partner with firms in every relevant jurisdiction so claims can be handled in the appropriate court or claims system.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.