If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma after working in South Dakota, several claim paths may be open. These usually include lawsuits against the manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos products, claims against asbestos bankruptcy trusts set up to pay asbestos victims, and federal benefits for veterans and federal civilian workers. Sometimes the owner of a site where an outside contractor's employees were exposed can also be responsible.
South Dakota gives a diagnosed worker three years to bring a personal-injury claim. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. After a death, the family's wrongful-death claim has three years from the date of death. In South Dakota a lawsuit isn't started until each company is served with the papers, so the safest step is to call as soon as possible after diagnosis.
You do not need to know the name of the asbestos product before you call. You do not need to have old employment records in hand. Many strong South Dakota cases begin with one sentence: "Dad worked at the power plant in Rapid City," or "He was a pipefitter at the packing plant in Sioux Falls." We rebuild the exposure history from there using product invoices, coworker information, trust records, and our database of 200,000+ verified asbestos exposure sites.
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Quick answers
| How long do we have to file? | Usually three years. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. If your loved one has already passed away, the wrongful-death claim has three years from the date of death. A South Dakota lawsuit starts when each company is served, so call as soon as you can. |
|---|---|
| Is there a South Dakota rule we should know about? | Yes. South Dakota is the only state that still bars a negligence claim if the injured person's own carelessness was more than "slight" compared with the companies'. It doesn't apply to strict product-liability claims. |
| Does a claim always mean filing a lawsuit? | No. Some South Dakota families recover only through asbestos bankruptcy trust claims and benefits, with no lawsuit at all. Many cases combine both paths. |
| Who may be responsible? | The manufacturers and suppliers of the asbestos products your loved one worked with or around, sometimes the owners of the sites where an outside contractor's employees worked, and, through the trust system, companies that have since gone bankrupt. |
| What compensation may be available? | Medical expenses, lost wages and earning capacity, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of companionship for a spouse, and in some cases punitive damages. South Dakota does not cap these damages in asbestos cases. |
| What evidence do we need? | A diagnosis and a general work history are usually enough to start. We rebuild the rest. |
| Can an adult child or spouse call? | Yes. A spouse, adult child, or other family member can start the conversation. |
“I started this firm after learning that the cancers that killed my father and grandparents were caused by asbestos, something we did not realize until it was too late to hold anyone accountable. That experience is why we built this site: so that no other family misses their chance to ask the questions, hear the options, and decide for themselves what to do.”
Was the exposure at a South Dakota power plant, packing plant, hospital, or federal facility?
Most South Dakota asbestos was in boiler rooms: the coal-fired stations that carried electricity across a rural state, the steam plants that heated its hospitals, colleges, and state institutions, the packing house in Sioux Falls, and the mines and cement kilns of the Black Hills. The asbestos trusts' lists hold 184 South Dakota entries across 39 communities, from 17 asbestos trusts.
| South Dakota worksite | City | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| South Dakota State University (South Dakota State College) | Brookings | At least 5 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Campus heating plant, steam lines, and fireproofed buildings. |
| Big Stone Plant (Otter Tail Power) | Big Stone City | At least 4 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Coal-fired station on the Minnesota line, in service from 1975. |
| Northwestern Public Service | Mitchell and Aberdeen | At least 4 trusts at Mitchell and at least 3 at Aberdeen, including Johns-Manville. Utility boilers, turbines, and steam lines. |
| Black Hills Power & Light — Ben French plant | Rapid City | At least 4 trusts, including Johns-Manville. The utility's Deadwood plant and its Kirk plant near Lead each appear on at least 3. |
| South Dakota State Hospital | Yankton | At least 4 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Central heating plant and steam lines to the wards. |
| Ellsworth Air Force Base | Rapid City | At least 3 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Base hospital and heating plants. Its civilian workers were federal employees. |
| John Morrell & Co. | Sioux Falls | At least 3 trusts, including Johns-Manville. Packing plant boilers, rendering and cooking lines, and refrigeration. |
| Northern States Power, including the Pathfinder plant | Sioux Falls | At least 3 trusts each, including Johns-Manville. Generating-station boilers and turbines. |
| Homestake Gold Mine | Lead | Listed by the W.R. Grace trust for 1977–1982. Mined from 1876 until it closed in 2001–2002; the site is now the Sanford Underground Research Facility. |
| Veterans' facilities | Hot Springs and Fort Meade | The VA's Battle Mountain Sanitarium at Hot Springs and its Fort Meade hospital, and the state-run State Soldiers' Home at Hot Springs, appear on trusts' lists. VA employees are covered by FECA. |
Check South Dakota asbestos exposure sites
Not seeing the worksite? That does not mean your family has no claim. Many successful South Dakota claims are built from product-handling reconstruction, coworker information, historical invoices, trust documents, and records from similar worksites.
Your legal options after a South Dakota mesothelioma diagnosis
Think in terms of claim paths, not a single lawsuit. Most South Dakota families have more than one path open to them.
Asbestos trust claims
When many asbestos manufacturers filed for bankruptcy, they set up asbestos trusts to pay current and future victims. Trust claims are filed through a paper-and-evidence process, not a courtroom trial, and don't require the company to still be in business. South Dakota law requires a family that sues to disclose its trust claims to the companies in the lawsuit, so we plan trust claims and any lawsuit together. Learn more about asbestos trust claims.
Product liability lawsuits
Lawsuits against the manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos products — insulation, gaskets, packing, refractory, friction products, and the many other asbestos-containing materials used in South Dakota power plants, mills, and institutions — are the core of most cases. South Dakota allows strict product-liability and negligence claims, and each company's product has to be linked to the worker's exposure. Learn more about product liability lawsuits.
Premises liability lawsuits
Sometimes the companies that owned the power plants and industrial sites where an outside contractor's employees were exposed can also be responsible. A worker can't sue his own employer this way, and Air Force bases and other federal installations are not sued as property owners. Claims against site owners also face a stricter deadline rule than product claims (see below). Learn more about premises liability lawsuits.
Workers' compensation, FECA, VA, and Social Security
Benefits can be pursued alongside a civil case. South Dakota workers' compensation covers occupational disease, but its notice and claim deadlines are short: written notice to the employer within six months after the job ended. Federal civilian employees at Ellsworth Air Force Base and the VA's Hot Springs and Fort Meade facilities are covered by FECA. Veterans with in-service asbestos exposure may qualify for VA service-connected disability. Social Security disability is available only to claimants under full retirement age. Some of these benefits must be repaid from a lawsuit recovery or are reduced by it, so we plan them together. Learn more about asbestos disability claims.
Can we choose not to sue?
Yes. Some South Dakota families pursue only trust claims and benefits and never file a lawsuit. We respect that decision. We will not pressure you into a court case you do not want.
Uncomfortable with the idea of a lawsuit? So was Clarence Borel. He spent 33 years as an insulator on the Gulf Coast and didn't believe in suing anyone — until he realized his coworkers would die the same way he was dying. His 1969 lawsuit helped establish the product-liability law that protects families today, and the cases that followed it eventually led to the bankruptcy trusts that pay claims now. Read his story.
How long do I have to file a South Dakota mesothelioma claim?
South Dakota's deadline is three years, but the clock works differently for different companies. For claims against the companies that made and sold asbestos products, the three years run from when the illness occurred or became known, or should have become known. For claims against others, such as site owners, South Dakota has no general discovery rule, so the three years can start before the diagnosis. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. If symptoms or an earlier X-ray, CT scan or screening showed asbestos disease, a South Dakota court may count the three years from then, so call us right away.
Starting the case. In South Dakota a lawsuit is started against each company when that company is served with the summons, not when the papers are filed, so we don't wait until the deadline is near.
After a death. The family's wrongful-death claim must be brought within three years from the date of death. The estate's separate survival claim, for the worker's own medical bills, lost earnings, and pain and suffering, keeps the worker's own deadline, paused for one year after the death, so it may run out sooner. South Dakota allows a death claim only where the worker, had he lived, could have brought the claim himself.
Claims against builders and installers. A separate South Dakota law cuts off claims about the design or construction of a building or other improvement to property ten years after the work was substantially completed. It can protect contractors and installers, but not an owner who was in possession and control of the property when the harm was caused, or anyone guilty of fraud, concealment, or willful or wanton misconduct in the work.
Workers' compensation has its own, shorter deadlines: written notice to the employer within six months after the job ended, and a claim within two years after the worker became disabled. A worker diagnosed years after retiring will often have missed them.
Call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.
Legal detail: South Dakota filing deadlines
Product claims — 3 years from injury or knowledge. S.D. Codified Laws § 15-2-12.2 (SL 1985, ch 157): an action against a manufacturer, lessor, or seller of a product for personal injury or death, "regardless of the substantive legal theory upon which the action is brought," including failure to warn, "may be commenced only within three years of the date when the personal injury, death, or property damage occurred, became known or should have become known to the injured party." A federal court applying it to a talc-related cancer asked the jury when the plaintiff's injury became or should have become known. Berg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos., 983 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (D.S.D. 2013).
Other personal-injury claims — 3 years from accrual. § 15-2-14(3): an action for personal injury "can be commenced only within three years after the cause of action shall have accrued." The South Dakota Supreme Court has refused to read a discovery rule into the general limitations statutes: "The legislature has thus acknowledged and rejected a discovery rule in South Dakota." Shippen v. Parrott, 506 N.W.2d 82, 85 (S.D. 1993); Koenig v. Lambert, 527 N.W.2d 903 (S.D. 1995). No South Dakota decision was found deciding when a latent asbestos disease claim against a non-product defendant accrues.
Commencement. "An action is commenced as to each defendant when the summons is served on him" (§ 15-2-30); delivering the summons, with intent that it be served, to the sheriff of the county where a defendant resides (for a corporation, where it was established, does its general business, or keeps an office) counts if service or publication follows within sixty days (§ 15-2-31).
Wrongful death — 3 years from death. "Every action for wrongful death shall be commenced within three years after the death" (§ 21-5-3). The action lies where the wrongful act "is such as would have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereto, if death had not ensued" (§ 21-5-1).
Survival. "All causes of action shall survive and be brought, notwithstanding the death of the person entitled or liable to the same," by or against the personal representative (§ 15-4-1). The running of any limitations period on a decedent's claim that was not barred at death "is suspended for one year following the decedent's death but resumes thereafter unless otherwise tolled" (§ 29A-3-109).
Improvement repose — 10 years. No action for personal injury or death "arising out of any deficiency in the design, planning, supervision, inspection, and observation of construction, or construction, of an improvement to real property" may be brought against those who performed or furnished that work "more than ten years after substantial completion" (§ 15-2A-3). The limitation may not be asserted "by any person in actual possession and control as owner, tenant or otherwise, of the improvement" when the deficiency caused the injury (§ 15-2A-4), or by any person "guilty of fraud, fraudulent concealment, fraudulent misrepresentations, or willful or wanton misconduct" in furnishing the work (§ 15-2A-7).
Public entities. No action for personal injury or death caused by a public entity or its employees may be maintained "unless written notice of the time, place, and cause of the injury is given to the public entity ... within one hundred eighty days after the injury," and the notice requirement does not extend the limitations period (§ 3-21-2; notice to the officers listed in § 3-21-3). No decision was found on when a latent disease is the "injury" for this purpose.
Venue. Actions "for the recovery of damages to persons or property may at the option of the plaintiff be brought and tried in the county where the damages were inflicted or the cause of action arose" (§ 15-5-8); otherwise, in the county where a defendant resides, or any county the plaintiff designates if no defendant resides in South Dakota (§ 15-5-6).
Workers' compensation. Written notice of an occupational disease must be given to the employer "within six months after the employment has ceased in which it is claimed that the disease was contracted," and within ninety days of a death, or "all rights to compensation ... are forever barred" (§ 62-8-29; Heupel v. Imprimis Technology, Inc., 473 N.W.2d 464 (S.D. 1991)). A claim must be filed with the Department of Labor and Regulation within two years after the claimant becomes disabled, or within two years of death (§ 62-8-11).
Who can be sued in a South Dakota asbestos case?
A typical South Dakota mesothelioma case has several defendants, because asbestos exposure happened across many different products, employers, and worksites over a career.
Product manufacturers and suppliers
The companies that made and sold the asbestos insulation, gaskets, packing, refractory, friction products, and other asbestos-containing products handled at South Dakota power plants, mills, institutions, and bases, and that are still in business. South Dakota allows strict product-liability and negligence claims. A distributor or retailer that didn't make the product can be held strictly liable only if it knew or should have known of the defect, though negligence claims against it remain. Each company's product has to be shown to have been a substantial factor in causing the disease.
Premises owners and site operators
The companies that owned the power plants and industrial sites where an outside contractor's employees were exposed. A site owner owes a hired worker reasonable care, including a warning about known, concealed dangers in the work area. Claims against site owners for exposure decades ago face South Dakota's general deadline, which has no discovery rule, so each one is evaluated case by case. A claim against the state, a county, a city, or a school district also needs written notice to that public body within 180 days after the injury, and what can be recovered from a public body may be limited to its insurance coverage. A worker can't sue his own employer this way, and Air Force bases and other federal installations are not sued as property owners.
Asbestos bankruptcy trusts
Where a company filed for bankruptcy and set up an asbestos trust, recovery comes through the trust rather than the courtroom. Many of the South Dakota worksites on the trusts' lists appear on several trusts' lists.
Employers
South Dakota workers' compensation is usually the only remedy against the worker's own employer. The exception for intentional torts requires proof that the employer knew injury was virtually certain, not just likely, and these claims rarely succeed.
Legal detail: South Dakota product liability, premises liability, and workers' compensation
Product liability. South Dakota adopted strict liability in tort under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A in Engberg v. Ford Motor Co., 87 S.D. 196, 205 N.W.2d 104 (1973); negligence claims are also available. The plaintiff's ordinary contributory negligence is not a defense to strict liability. Smith v. Smith, 278 N.W.2d 155 (S.D. 1979). No strict-liability claim may be maintained against a distributor, wholesaler, dealer, or retail seller unless it is also the manufacturer, assembler, or component maker, or knew or should have known of the defect; other claims against sellers are not limited (S.D. Codified Laws § 20-9-9). Defenses: certain unforeseeable alterations (§ 20-9-10), and conformity "with the generally recognized and prevailing state of the art existing at the time the specific product involved was first sold" may be considered on the standard of care, breach, and defect (§ 20-9-10.1).
Causation. South Dakota requires that the defendant's conduct be "a substantial factor in bringing about the harm" and that the harm be a foreseeable consequence. Leslie v. City of Bonesteel, 303 N.W.2d 117, 119 (S.D. 1981), quoting Williams v. United States, 450 F. Supp. 1040, 1046 (D.S.D. 1978). No South Dakota appellate decision on asbestos causation was found.
Premises liability. A landowner owes an invitee hired to do work on the property a duty of reasonable care, including a duty to warn of known, concealed dangers in the area of the work. Luke v. Deal, 2005 SD 6, 692 N.W.2d 165 (contractor's loader operator killed when a buried propane tank was punctured). A principal contractor is liable for workers' compensation to a subcontractor's employee injured on premises under its control (§ 62-3-10).
Workers' compensation exclusivity. Compensation "shall exclude all other rights and remedies" of the employee and family against the employer and its employees, "except rights and remedies arising from intentional tort" (§ 62-3-2). For occupational disease, an insured employer's liability "is exclusive and in place of any other civil liability" (§ 62-8-6). The intentional-tort exception requires that the employer had actual knowledge of the dangerous condition and that injury was substantially (virtually) certain; conduct that is "negligent, probably reckless and possibly wanton" is not enough. Harn v. Continental Lumber Co., 506 N.W.2d 91 (S.D. 1993); Fryer v. Kranz, 2000 SD 125, 616 N.W.2d 102.
Third-party claims and reimbursement. An injured employee may claim compensation and sue third parties, and a third-party recovery of "like damages" offsets future compensation (§ 62-4-38). An employer that has paid compensation is reimbursed from the recovery, less the reasonable cost of collecting it, which may include an attorney's fee of up to 35 percent (§§ 62-4-39, 62-4-40).
Successor companies. South Dakota limits the asbestos liability of a corporation that became a successor by merger or consolidation before January 1, 1972 to the fair market value of the transferor's total gross assets at the time of the merger, increased each year by the prime rate plus one percent, not compounded (§§ 20-9-36 to 20-9-43, SL 2010, ch 110; § 20-9-42). The limit does not protect a successor that continued the same asbestos business, and it does not limit workers' compensation (§ 20-9-43).
What compensation can a South Dakota mesothelioma case recover?
South Dakota does not cap compensatory damages or punitive damages in asbestos cases. Its $500,000 cap on general damages applies only to medical-malpractice claims.
Personal-injury compensation
- Medical expenses, past and future. South Dakota follows the common-law collateral source rule outside malpractice cases, so the companies generally can't reduce what they owe because insurance or Medicare paid the bills, though Medicare, Medicaid, workers' compensation and some insurers can be repaid from the recovery.
- Lost wages and lost earning capacity, past and future.
- Pain, suffering, and mental anguish, past and future.
- Loss of enjoyment of life.
- Loss of consortium for a spouse.
- Punitive damages in some cases. They require proof of oppression, fraud, or malice, and before any discovery on them a South Dakota state court must first find, after a hearing, clear and convincing evidence of a reasonable basis to believe the company's conduct was willful, wanton, or malicious. That has to be shown against each company.
Wrongful-death compensation
After a death, South Dakota allows two claims. The wrongful-death claim is brought by the estate's personal representative for the spouse and children (or, if there are none, the parents and next of kin) and compensates their pecuniary loss from the death, which the court divides among them; a court must approve a settlement unless all the beneficiaries are competent adults and agree in writing. Federal courts applying South Dakota law have held that punitive damages are not available in the wrongful-death claim. The survival claim belongs to the estate and recovers the worker's own medical bills, lost earnings, and pain and suffering before death; punitive damages can be sought there.
Legal detail: South Dakota damages and wrongful death
No general cap. S.D. Codified Laws § 21-3-11 limits total general damages to $500,000 only in malpractice actions against listed health-care providers. Damages for a non-contract wrong are "the amount which will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or not" (§ 21-3-1). Evidence of collateral-source payments is admissible by statute only in health-care malpractice actions (§ 21-3-12).
Punitive damages. "In any action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, actual or presumed," the jury may award damages for the sake of example and to punish the defendant (§ 21-3-2). "[B]efore any discovery relating thereto may be commenced and before any such claim may be submitted to the finder of fact, the court shall find, after a hearing and based upon clear and convincing evidence, that there is a reasonable basis to believe that there has been willful, wanton or malicious conduct on the part of the party claimed against" (§ 21-1-4.1; Dahl v. Sittner, 474 N.W.2d 897 (S.D. 1991)). The federal district court has held § 21-1-4.1 procedural and not applicable in federal diversity cases. Ammann v. Massey-Ferguson, Ltd., 933 F. Supp. 840 (D.S.D. 1996). No statutory cap; awards are reviewed for excessiveness, Veeder v. Kennedy, 1999 SD 23, 589 N.W.2d 610, and under BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (1996).
Wrongful death. S.D. Codified Laws §§ 21-5-1 to 21-5-8. The action is "for the exclusive benefit of the wife or husband and children, or if there be neither of them, then of the parents and next of kin," brought in the name of the personal representative (§ 21-5-5). "[T]he jury may give such damages as they may think proportionate to the pecuniary injury resulting from such death" (§ 21-5-7); the recovery is apportioned among the beneficiaries by the court unless they agree among themselves (§ 21-5-8). A settlement needs the approval of the court where the case is pending or the appointing court, unless all the beneficiaries are adults and competent and consent in writing (§ 21-5-6). Punitive damages are not recoverable in the wrongful-death action. Bethel v. Janis, 597 F. Supp. 56, 59 n.4 (D.S.D. 1984); Ammann, above.
Survival. § 15-4-1. The worker's own personal-injury claim survives and is maintainable independently of the wrongful-death action, and punitive damages may be sought in it. Ammann, above (citing Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'n, 506 N.W.2d 107, 127 (S.D. 1993)). The law of the state where the injury occurred determines whether a personal-injury claim survives; the place of injury is "where the forces causing the injury first result in actionable injury" (§ 21-3-14).
Costs and offers of judgment. The prevailing party recovers its disbursements, such as filing, service, witness, and transcript costs (§ 15-17-37). If a party rejects an offer of judgment and the judgment finally obtained is not more favorable than the offer, that party "must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer" (§ 15-6-68).
What evidence do we need to prove a South Dakota asbestos case?
You do not need to gather everything before calling. Most families have a fraction of this information; we build the rest from our database, coworker contacts, historical product records, and trust documents.
| Evidence | Why it helps | What if you do not have it? |
|---|---|---|
| Work history (employers, dates, job titles) | Lets us match your loved one's career to specific asbestos products and trusts | We reconstruct from Social Security earnings records and union records |
| Diagnosis records (pathology report, imaging) | Confirms the mesothelioma diagnosis and the anatomical site | Your treating doctors or hospital medical records department can provide |
| Names of coworkers | Coworker testimony often identifies specific products on the jobsite | Often unnecessary — our database may already document the worksite |
| Military service records (DD-214) | Establishes veteran status and supports VA disability claim | Available through the National Archives |
| Union records | Documents the jobsite and trade with great precision | We work directly with union locals to obtain these |
| Old paystubs, W-2s, employer letters | Confirms employment dates for trusts that require dated proof | Often replaceable through Social Security records |
| Spouse's recollections of work clothes, dust, and "take-home" exposure | Supports a possible household exposure claim | Just describe it on the call — we'll capture the details |
Even when families have very little documentation, we can usually move forward. In the case itself, the specific products and companies have to be identified and proved, which is why that reconstruction work matters.
Legal detail: South Dakota's asbestos trust claims law
Trust disclosure. S.D. Codified Laws ch. 21-66 (SL 2017, ch 94, for asbestos actions filed on or after July 1, 2017). Not more than 120 days before the trial date, the plaintiff must give each party a sworn statement identifying every asbestos trust claim filed by or for the plaintiff, including claims for other asbestos-related conditions, and any trust claim that could be filed, with the amount claimed, filing date, disposition, and any request to defer the claim (§§ 21-66-2, -3). The plaintiff must make all trust claims material available and supplement it within ninety days of a new or supplemented claim (§ 21-66-4). Trust claims materials and trust governance documents are presumed relevant, authentic, and admissible; privilege does not apply, and defendants may seek discovery from trusts (§ 21-66-5). The court must stay the case if the required disclosures are not made, and may stay it until an identified potential trust claim is filed (§ 21-66-6). A defendant may move to require the plaintiff to file additional trust claims (§§ 21-66-7 to -9). If the case goes to trial before a trust claim is resolved, the filing may be admitted in evidence (§ 21-66-10). Failure to comply is subject to sanctions (§ 21-66-11).
No asbestos medical-criteria act. No South Dakota statute setting medical criteria for asbestos claims, and no asbestos case-management order, was found.
How does South Dakota divide responsibility when many asbestos companies were involved?
The slight-negligence rule. If a company argues that the worker was partly careless, South Dakota allows a negligence recovery only if the worker's carelessness was "slight" compared with the combined negligence of the companies, and then reduces the damages in proportion. If it was more than slight, the negligence claim is barred. The jury isn't asked to state a percentage for the worker's fault when it decides that question. South Dakota is now the only state with this rule. It doesn't apply to strict product-liability claims, where ordinary carelessness by the worker is not a defense, though a company can argue that the worker knowingly assumed the risk.
Assumption of risk. A company can argue that the worker knew of the danger, appreciated it, and voluntarily accepted it. In South Dakota that is a separate defense the company must prove. Whether a worker who was never warned about asbestos knew and appreciated the danger depends on the facts of each case.
Shared responsibility. Where several companies are jointly responsible, a company allocated less than half of the total fault can't be made to pay more than twice its own share. Settlements with other companies are credited against the verdict, and trust payments can also affect a verdict, depending on how they are treated.
Legal detail: comparative negligence, joint and several liability, and settlement credits
Comparative negligence — slight/gross. S.D. Codified Laws § 20-9-2: contributory negligence "does not bar a recovery when the contributory negligence of the plaintiff was slight in comparison with the negligence of the defendant, but in such case, the damages shall be reduced in proportion to the amount of plaintiff's contributory negligence." The plaintiff's negligence is compared with the combined negligence of all defendants, including those that settled. Wood v. City of Crooks, 1997 SD 20, 559 N.W.2d 558. "Slight" means small in quantum compared with the defendant's negligence. Crabb v. Wade, 84 S.D. 93, 167 N.W.2d 546 (1969). A 1998 amendment provides that the determination "shall be made without disclosing any determination of percentage of plaintiff's fault by special interrogatory" (SL 1998, ch 125). Whether the bar applies is ordinarily a jury question. Urban v. Wait's Supermarket, Inc., 294 N.W.2d 793 (S.D. 1980); Luke v. Deal, above (jury found the decedent's negligence more than slight; reversed on the duty-to-warn instructions, with contributory negligence left to the jury on retrial). Nebraska, the only other state that used a slight/gross rule, replaced it in 1992 (Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,185.09).
Strict liability. Contributory negligence is not a defense to strict liability in tort. Smith v. Smith, 278 N.W.2d 155 (S.D. 1979).
Assumption of risk. A complete defense requiring actual or constructive knowledge of the risk, appreciation of its character, and voluntary acceptance with the time, knowledge, and experience to make an intelligent choice; ordinarily a jury question. Ray v. Downes, 1998 SD 40, 576 N.W.2d 896; Goepfert v. Filler, 1997 SD 56, 563 N.W.2d 140.
Joint and several liability. "[A]ny party who is allocated less than fifty percent of the total fault allocated to all the parties may not be jointly liable for more than twice the percentage of fault allocated to that party" (§ 15-8-15.1, SL 1987, ch 154). The trier of fact considers each party's conduct and its causal relation to the damages and may treat closely related persons as a single party (§ 15-8-15.2).
Settlement credits. A release of one joint tortfeasor "reduces the claim against the other tort-feasors in the amount of the consideration paid for the release, or in any amount or proportion by which the release provides that the total claim shall be reduced, if greater than the consideration paid" (§ 15-8-17); a release cuts off contribution claims against the settling company only if it is given before the other company's right to a contribution judgment accrued and provides for a pro rata reduction (§ 15-8-18).
Choice of law. South Dakota applies the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws "most significant relationship" test to torts. Chambers v. Dakotah Charter, Inc., 488 N.W.2d 63 (S.D. 1992). By statute, the law of the state where the injury occurred decides whether a personal-injury claim survives death (§ 21-3-14).
How trust claims, lawsuits, and benefits can work together
| Path | What it pays | How it interacts |
|---|---|---|
| Asbestos trust claims | Defined-value payments from each qualifying trust based on diagnosis and exposure history. No lawsuit required. | In a lawsuit, South Dakota requires the trust claims to be disclosed, and they can be used as evidence. |
| Civil lawsuit | Medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment, loss of consortium, and sometimes punitive damages from the companies still in business. | Settlements with other companies are credited against the verdict. |
| South Dakota workers' compensation | Wage-loss and medical benefits for occupational disease from the employer. | Written notice within six months after the job ended; repaid from a lawsuit recovery. |
| VA service-connected disability | Monthly compensation for veterans whose mesothelioma is linked to military asbestos exposure. | Not reduced by a civil or trust recovery. |
| FECA | Federal workers' compensation for civilian employees of federal facilities, including Ellsworth Air Force Base and the VA. | Must be repaid from a recovery against the companies. |
| Social Security disability | Monthly benefits for claimants under full retirement age who can't work. | Workers' compensation can offset it. |
These paths can often be pursued together, but they interact. Workers' compensation and FECA must be repaid from a civil recovery, and a worker eligible for both VA and FECA for the same illness generally has to choose. The order of trust claims, benefits, and any lawsuit is decided case by case with the trial team.
South Dakota Air Force, VA, and federal-facility exposure
- Ellsworth Air Force Base near Rapid City — opened in 1942 as the Rapid City Army Air Base and a bomber base for most of its history. The trusts' lists document it on at least 3 trusts, including Johns-Manville.
- Veterans' facilities — the VA's Battle Mountain Sanitarium at Hot Springs and its hospital at Fort Meade near Sturgis, and the state-run State Soldiers' Home at Hot Springs, all on trusts' lists.
- The former Homestake mine at Lead — now the Sanford Underground Research Facility, run by a state authority. Homestake's gold mining was private industry, not federal.
Federal benefit pathways. Air Force, Army, and other veterans with in-service asbestos exposure may pursue VA service-connected disability; the VA has no automatic presumption for asbestos diseases, and a claim needs a described in-service exposure, a diagnosis, and a doctor's opinion linking the disease to service. A trust or civil recovery doesn't reduce VA disability. Federal civilian employees at Ellsworth and the VA facilities are covered by FECA, which is their only remedy against the United States and must be repaid from a recovery against the companies; a worker eligible for both VA and FECA for the same illness generally has to choose. Employees of the state-run Soldiers' Home and of private contractors on federal sites are under South Dakota workers' compensation instead. The bases and VA facilities themselves are not sued as property owners; a family member's own illness from dust brought home is a separate injury, and any claim against the United States goes through the Federal Tort Claims Act, which has its own, shorter deadlines. Social Security disability is available only to claimants under full retirement age.
Legal detail: federal programs
FECA. Exclusive remedy against the United States for federal employees (5 U.S.C. § 8116(c)); a claim must be filed within three years, which for a latent disability runs from when the employee has a compensable disability and knows or should know of its link to the employment (§ 8122(a), (b)); a third-party recovery must be refunded and future benefits credited (§ 8132); FECA and VA benefits for the same injury generally require an election (§ 8116(b)).
Federal Tort Claims Act. A household member's own claim against the United States must first be presented in writing to the responsible agency within two years after it accrues, and suit must follow within six months after the agency mails a final denial (28 U.S.C. §§ 2401(b), 2675(a)).
What happens after you call?
A free case review is a conversation, not a commitment to file a lawsuit.
- Free phone call. You tell us where your loved one worked, when, and what the diagnosis is. We listen.
- Database match. We check the worksites against our database of 200,000+ verified asbestos exposure sites, including all 184 South Dakota entries on the asbestos trusts' lists, and identify the trusts and product manufacturers that match.
- Records gathering. We obtain Social Security earnings records, union records, military records (if applicable), and medical records. You do not need to track these down yourself.
- Strategy. We map out which trust claims, which lawsuit defendants, and which benefit applications fit your situation.
- Planning the filings together. The order of trust claims, any lawsuit, and benefit applications is decided case by case with the trial team.
- Updates. You hear from us regularly. We send copies of every meaningful document. You decide whether to accept any settlement offer.
- No fee unless we recover. Contingent fee. A family that rejects a formal offer of judgment and then does no better at trial can be ordered to pay the other side's later costs, so we discuss every settlement offer with the family before anyone responds to it.
Call 833-4-ASBESTOS when you're ready to start.
How South Dakota's laws may work in practice
Edward is a 72-year-old retired pipefitter from Rapid City. From 1972 through 2008 he worked for an outside mechanical contractor, mostly at Black Hills Power & Light's Ben French plant in Rapid City and the utility's other Black Hills plants, never as a Black Hills Power employee. His work included replacing pipe insulation on steam lines, rebuilding boiler refractory during outages, and replacing gaskets and packing on turbines, pumps, and valves. He had no significant health complaints until late 2025, when he developed persistent abdominal pain, unexplained weight loss, and fluid accumulation in the abdomen. In March 2026 a diagnostic laparoscopy with biopsy confirmed peritoneal mesothelioma of the sarcomatoid histological subtype — a particularly aggressive presentation.
For Edward and his family, several things are happening at once. Because his symptoms began in late 2025, South Dakota's three-year deadline is counted, to be safe, from then, so his case should be started, with every company served, well before late 2028. The trusts' lists document at least 4 trusts at the Ben French plant, including Johns-Manville, and his trust claims are planned with the trial team; South Dakota requires them to be disclosed in the lawsuit. A lawsuit names the companies still in business whose insulation, gaskets, packing, refractory, and equipment he worked with or around, on strict-liability and negligence claims; his own carelessness, if a company claims it, isn't a defense to the strict-liability claims. His workers' compensation claim against his former employer is very likely barred, because written notice was due within six months after he left the job. South Dakota doesn't cap his medical expenses, lost earnings, pain and suffering, or his wife's loss of companionship. Punitive damages are possible against a company only on proof of its own oppression, fraud, or malice, and in South Dakota state court only after a hearing. Edward's wife and children lived with the dust from his work clothes for decades. As part of our representation, we offer free asbestos health screening to family members of every client who may have been exposed at home. The screening is a chest X-ray read by a B-reader, with a CT scan if needed; it looks for asbestos-related changes in the lungs and isn't a diagnosis or a reliable way to find mesothelioma early. If a family member is later diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, they may have their own claims. If Edward passes away during the case, his estate's personal representative continues it as a survival claim, and his personal representative can bring a wrongful-death claim for his wife and children within three years from his death.
Legal analysis of this hypothetical
Deadline. Three years under S.D. Codified Laws § 15-2-12.2 for the product claims, counted from the late-2025 symptoms to be safe because the statute runs from when the injury occurred or should have become known. Each defendant must be served within the period (§ 15-2-30).
Claims. Strict products liability and negligence against the solvent manufacturers and suppliers of the products he worked with or around, each shown to be a substantial factor. No claim against Black Hills Power: a premises claim would fall under § 15-2-14(3), which has no discovery rule (Shippen; Koenig), for exposure that ended in 2008. The companies that went through asbestos bankruptcies are trust claims only.
Workers' compensation. An occupational-disease claim against his last employer (§ 62-8-15) required written notice within six months after the employment ceased (§ 62-8-29; Heupel), so it is very likely barred. Exclusivity still bars a tort claim against the employer (§§ 62-3-2, 62-8-6).
Allocation and damages. § 20-9-2 on the negligence counts only (Smith v. Smith); assumption of risk is the company's burden (Ray; Goepfert). § 15-8-15.1 limits a company found less than 50% at fault to twice its share; settlements credited under § 15-8-17. No cap on compensatory or punitive damages; punitive damages under § 21-3-2, company by company, with the § 21-1-4.1 hearing if the case is in state court (Ammann).
Trust filings. The Ben French plant appears on at least 4 trusts' lists, including Johns-Manville (Babcock & Wilcox, Burns & Roe, Eagle-Picher). Sworn disclosure and production of trust claims materials under ch. 21-66. Order and timing decided case by case with the trial team.
Federal coordination. No military service described, so no VA claim. No SSDI: he is past full retirement age.
Family. Free screening. A household member's own claim would be a separate injury; no South Dakota decision on take-home duty was found.
Survival and wrongful death. If he dies while the case is pending, the action survives (§ 15-4-1) and his personal representative continues it, with punitive damages still available (Ammann); the wrongful-death claim for his wife and children (§§ 21-5-1, -5, -7) runs three years from death (§ 21-5-3), for pecuniary loss only.
This example is general. Every case depends on the diagnosis, exposure history, dates, defendants, applicable law, and available evidence.
Why families choose our firm
Our firm has recovered over $400 million for asbestos clients nationally. Our South Dakota work is supported by our proprietary database of 200,000+ verified asbestos exposure sites built over more than a decade — including all 184 South Dakota entries on the asbestos trusts' lists, from 17 trusts. We routinely get claims approved by many asbestos trusts.
- No investigation lag. We often know on the first call which trusts apply to your worksite — including South Dakota State University, the Big Stone Plant, Black Hills Power & Light's plants, Northwestern Public Service, the State Hospital at Yankton, Ellsworth Air Force Base, and John Morrell in Sioux Falls.
- Case strategy built for South Dakota law. We work with South Dakota's three-year deadlines and its service rule, its slight-negligence rule, its joint-liability limits, and its trust-disclosure law.
- Filing during life. A case started while the worker is alive preserves his own testimony. If he passes away during the case, his estate continues it and the family's wrongful-death claim follows.
- Benefits coordination. Workers' compensation, FECA, VA, and Social Security are coordinated case by case with the trial team.
- Remote case handling — most of our South Dakota clients never need to come to an office.
- No fee unless we recover. Contingent fee. We discuss every settlement offer with the family before anyone responds to it.
Frequently asked questions
What is the statute of limitations for mesothelioma in South Dakota?
Three years. For claims against the companies that made and sold asbestos products, the clock starts when the illness occurred or became known, or should have; for other claims, South Dakota has no general discovery rule. Exactly when the clock starts varies, so to be safe, count from the date of diagnosis. If symptoms or an earlier X-ray, CT scan or screening showed asbestos disease, a South Dakota court may count the three years from then, so call us right away. A lawsuit is started only when each company is served.
What if my loved one already passed away?
The wrongful-death claim must be brought within three years from the date of death. The estate's separate survival claim for the worker's own suffering, medical bills and lost earnings keeps the worker's own three-year deadline, paused for one year after the death, so it may run out sooner. Call as soon as you can.
What is the "slight negligence" rule, and does it end my case?
It is South Dakota's comparative-negligence rule, and South Dakota is now the only state that uses it. If a company proves the worker was careless, a negligence claim survives only if that carelessness was "slight" compared with the companies' combined negligence, and the damages are then reduced. If it was more than slight, the negligence claim is barred. The rule doesn't apply to strict product-liability claims. How it plays out depends on the evidence in each case, which is one reason to call early.
Can my family still call if my loved one already died?
Yes. South Dakota families can bring a wrongful-death claim for the spouse and children and a survival claim for the estate, covering the worker's own suffering before death. Both are brought by the estate's personal representative.
Do I need to know the asbestos product names?
No. Most families do not know the specific product names, and we don't expect you to. We reconstruct the product exposure from the worksite, the job trade, the time period, and our database.
Do I need old employment records before calling?
No. Social Security earnings records, union records, and our own database fill most of these gaps.
Can an adult child call for a parent?
Yes. Adult children and spouses regularly start the conversation, especially when the diagnosed family member is in active treatment.
Will we have to file a lawsuit?
Not necessarily. Some South Dakota families recover only through asbestos trust claims and benefits without filing a court case. We respect that choice.
Are trust claims separate from lawsuits?
A trust claim is a paper-and-evidence filing against a bankrupt company's asbestos trust, not a courtroom trial, and it does not require a lawsuit. But if a family sues in South Dakota, the law requires the trust claims to be disclosed to the companies and allows them to be used as evidence, and trust payments can affect a verdict, so we plan trust claims and any lawsuit together.
Can I file a South Dakota claim if I no longer live in South Dakota?
Often yes. Many former South Dakota workers retired to other states. A South Dakota court can usually hear claims about exposure that happened in South Dakota, though each company has to be one the court can reach, and which state's law applies depends on the facts. We handle it remotely.
What if the exposure happened at work?
That is the typical situation. South Dakota workers' compensation is usually the only remedy against the worker's own employer, and its notice deadline is six months after the job ended. Recovery in a lawsuit comes from the manufacturers of the asbestos products and, where an outside contractor's employee was exposed, sometimes the owner of the site.
What if the exposure happened through a spouse's work clothes?
A family member who became ill from dust brought home on a worker's clothes may have a claim of their own, but no South Dakota court has decided whether a company owed household members a duty, so each claim is evaluated case by case. As part of our representation, we offer free asbestos health screening to family members of every client who may have been exposed at home.
Are punitive damages available in South Dakota asbestos cases?
Sometimes. South Dakota doesn't cap them, but they require proof of a company's own oppression, fraud, or malice, and in state court a judge must first find, after a hearing, clear and convincing evidence of a reasonable basis to believe the company's conduct was willful, wanton, or malicious. Federal courts applying South Dakota law have held they aren't available in a wrongful-death claim, though they can be sought in the estate's survival claim.
Will Medicare or insurance reduce my recovery?
The companies generally can't reduce what they owe because Medicare or insurance paid the medical bills. But Medicare, Medicaid, workers' compensation, and some insurers have a right to be repaid from the recovery, so we account for those repayments when planning the case.
What if I worked at the Homestake Gold Mine?
Homestake at Lead was mined from 1876 until it closed in 2001–2002 and is now the Sanford Underground Research Facility. The W.R. Grace trust lists the mine for 1977–1982, and most workers exposed before 1983 also qualify for the Johns-Manville trust. Homestake's own employees have workers' compensation, not a lawsuit, against Homestake, but they can still bring trust claims and product claims against the companies that made the asbestos products used underground and in the mill.
What if I worked at Ellsworth Air Force Base?
Civilian federal employees are covered by FECA, which must be repaid from a recovery against the companies. Air Force veterans with a described in-service asbestos exposure may be eligible for VA service-connected disability, with a doctor's opinion linking the disease to service. Ellsworth appears on at least 3 trusts' lists, including Johns-Manville.
What if I worked at Black Hills Power, Northern States Power, or Northwestern Public Service?
The trusts' lists document Black Hills Power & Light's Ben French plant in Rapid City on at least 4 trusts and its Deadwood and Kirk plants on at least 3 each; Northern States Power in Sioux Falls, including the Pathfinder plant, on at least 3; and Northwestern Public Service on at least 4 at Mitchell and at least 3 at Aberdeen — each including Johns-Manville. A utility's own employees have workers' compensation against the utility, but boilermakers, pipefitters, insulators, and turbine crews can bring trust claims and product claims against the companies that made the asbestos products.
Where will my South Dakota case be filed?
In a South Dakota circuit court. South Dakota lets an injured person sue in the county where the injury was inflicted or the claim arose, or in a county where one of the companies sued resides; if none of them resides in South Dakota, the family can choose the county. Some cases are heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota.
Talk with a South Dakota mesothelioma lawyer
Whether your family is dealing with a new diagnosis, a very sick loved one, or a death from mesothelioma, our team is ready to listen.
You do not need to know the product names. You do not need to have all the records. You do not need to travel to our office. A spouse or adult child can call for the family. The first call costs nothing and creates no obligation.
Related resources
Sources and references
Statutes
- S.D. Codified Laws § 15-2-12.2 — Three-year limitations period for product actions, from when the injury occurred, became known, or should have become known.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 15-2-14(3) — Three-year limitations period for personal injury, from accrual.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 3-21-2, 3-21-3 — 180-day written notice of claims against public entities.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 15-2-30, 15-2-31 — An action is commenced against each defendant by service of the summons.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 15-2A-3, 15-2A-4, 15-2A-7 — Ten-year repose for construction of improvements to real property; not available to an owner in possession and control or for fraud or willful or wanton misconduct.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 15-4-1 — Survival of causes of action.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 15-5-6, 15-5-8 — Venue.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 15-6-68 — Offers of judgment.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 15-8-15.1, 15-8-15.2 — Joint liability limited to twice the share of a party less than 50% at fault; allocation of fault.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 15-8-17, 15-8-18 — Releases and settlement credits.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 15-17-37 — Prevailing party's disbursements.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 20-9-2 — Comparative negligence (slight/gross).
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 20-9-9, 20-9-10, 20-9-10.1 — Product sellers, alterations, and state of the art.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 20-9-36 to 20-9-43 — Successor asbestos-related liabilities.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 21-1-4.1, 21-3-2 — Punitive damages: standard and pre-discovery hearing.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 21-3-1 — Measure of damages for a non-contract wrong.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 21-3-11 — Medical-malpractice general damages cap (not applicable to asbestos cases).
- S.D. Codified Laws § 21-3-12 — Collateral-source evidence admissible only in health-care malpractice actions.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 21-32A-1 — Public entities' immunity waived to the extent of insurance or risk-pool coverage.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 21-3-14 — Law of the place of injury governs survival.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 21-5-1 to 21-5-8 — Wrongful death (§ 21-5-3, three years from death).
- S.D. Codified Laws ch. 21-66 — Asbestos trust claims disclosure.
- S.D. Codified Laws § 29A-3-109 — One-year suspension of a decedent's limitations period after death.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 62-3-2, 62-3-10, 62-4-38 to 62-4-40 — Workers' compensation exclusivity, principal contractors, third-party actions and reimbursement.
- S.D. Codified Laws §§ 62-8-6, 62-8-11, 62-8-15, 62-8-29 — Occupational disease: exclusivity, claim and notice deadlines, last employer.
- 5 U.S.C. §§ 8116, 8122, 8132 — FECA exclusivity, VA election, claim deadline, and third-party refunds.
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401(b), 2675(a) — Federal Tort Claims Act presentment and suit deadlines.
Cases
- Crabb v. Wade, 84 S.D. 93, 167 N.W.2d 546 (1969) — "Slight" means small in quantum.
- Engberg v. Ford Motor Co., 87 S.D. 196, 205 N.W.2d 104 (1973) — Adoption of strict products liability.
- Smith v. Smith, 278 N.W.2d 155 (S.D. 1979) — Contributory negligence is not a defense to strict liability.
- Williams v. United States, 450 F. Supp. 1040 (D.S.D. 1978) — Substantial factor and foreseeability.
- Urban v. Wait's Supermarket, Inc., 294 N.W.2d 793 (S.D. 1980) — Whether negligence was more than slight is ordinarily for the jury.
- Leslie v. City of Bonesteel, 303 N.W.2d 117 (S.D. 1981) — Proximate cause: substantial factor and foreseeability.
- Bethel v. Janis, 597 F. Supp. 56 (D.S.D. 1984) — No punitive damages in wrongful death.
- Heupel v. Imprimis Technology, Inc., 473 N.W.2d 464 (S.D. 1991) — Occupational-disease written-notice requirement.
- Dahl v. Sittner, 474 N.W.2d 897 (S.D. 1991) — Pre-discovery punitive damages hearing.
- Chambers v. Dakotah Charter, Inc., 488 N.W.2d 63 (S.D. 1992) — Most-significant-relationship choice of law.
- Shippen v. Parrott, 506 N.W.2d 82 (S.D. 1993) — No discovery rule under the general limitations statutes.
- Harn v. Continental Lumber Co., 506 N.W.2d 91 (S.D. 1993) — Intentional-tort exception to comp exclusivity.
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'n, 506 N.W.2d 107 (S.D. 1993) — Personal-injury claim maintainable independently of wrongful death.
- Koenig v. Lambert, 527 N.W.2d 903 (S.D. 1995) — § 15-2-14 runs from the tortious conduct, not discovery of the harm.
- Ammann v. Massey-Ferguson, Ltd., 933 F. Supp. 840 (D.S.D. 1996) — Punitive damages in the survival claim, not wrongful death.
- Goepfert v. Filler, 1997 SD 56, 563 N.W.2d 140 — Elements of assumption of risk.
- Wood v. City of Crooks, 1997 SD 20, 559 N.W.2d 558 — Plaintiff's negligence compared with all defendants'.
- Ray v. Downes, 1998 SD 40, 576 N.W.2d 896 — Assumption of risk.
- Veeder v. Kennedy, 1999 SD 23, 589 N.W.2d 610 — Review of punitive awards.
- Fryer v. Kranz, 2000 SD 125, 616 N.W.2d 102 — Intentional-tort exception: virtual certainty.
- Luke v. Deal, 2005 SD 6, 692 N.W.2d 165 — Landowner's duty to a hired invitee.
- Berg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos., 983 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (D.S.D. 2013) — § 15-2-12.2 knowledge date in a toxic-exposure cancer case.
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (1996) — Federal due-process review of punitive damages.
Last reviewed: November 2026. The Law Offices of Justinian C. Lane, Esq. — PLLC | Round Rock, TX · Mesa, AZ · Redmond, WA. We partner with firms in every relevant jurisdiction so claims can be handled in the appropriate court or claims system.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.