No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Robert M. Brown of the South Carolina State Board of Health, Dust Study of the Mule Spinning Department at North Charleston (1938)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A covering letter of April 15, 1938, from Robert M. Brown, chemical engineer in the industrial hygiene division of the State Board of Health of South Carolina, to E. H. Jeffords, general manager of the General Asbestos & Rubber plant of Raybestos-Manhattan at North Charleston, with Brown's four-page report of a dust study made at the plant's request in the mule spinning department during the week of April 4, 1938. Counts there averaged about 0.85 to 1.17 million particles per cubic foot of air, including a test with all dust control on the same floor shut off to "represent those in the plant in 1930." Brown concluded that the dust was "far below that minimum necessary to cause asbestosis in the workers" and that exhaust ventilation in the department "is in no wise indicated." In the letter he called the results "quite gratifying."

Author
Robert M. Brown
Published by
State Board of Health of South Carolina
Series
The Sumner Simpson Papers
Date
April 15, 1938
Number
Simpson no. 03414, 03415-03418
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Covering letter, April 15, 1938 · 1 pages · 30 KB

Read online Download the PDF Enclosure: Report of Dust Study Made in Mule Spinning Department, week of April 4, 1938 · 4 pages · 126 KB

What it shows

The mule spinning room was the only department in the plant without exhaust ventilation. The company asked the state health board, working with the U.S. Public Health Service, to recheck it against the January and February 1937 survey, and to reconstruct conditions as they had been in 1930 to see whether dust from the twisting and winding machines raised the counts. The report does not say why 1930 conditions mattered. Jeffords sent a copy to Sumner Simpson marked "Confidential" (his April 18 letter).

In Johns-Manville's index

Johns-Manville's attorneys indexed the Sumner Simpson Papers. Their index describes these documents as follows:

03414. Transmittal letter for report of dust study made in spinning department during week of 4/4/38. Informs the results are "quite gratifying".

03415-03418. "Report of Dust Study Made in Mule Spinning Department of General Asbestos and Rubber Co., North Charleston, S.C." Study made to determine levels of asbestos dust which workers were exposed to. Gives details of mule spinning operations and equipment. Concludes: dust concentrations in this department are far below minimum necessary to cause asbestosis and that there is not a need for exhaust ventilation equipment in this department.

About this copy

These are documents 03414, 03415-03418 of the Sumner Simpson Papers, as numbered in the collection's index.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“Robert M. Brown of the South Carolina State Board of Health, Dust Study of the Mule Spinning Department at North Charleston.” April 15, 1938. The Sumner Simpson Papers, Simpson no. 03414, 03415-03418. State Board of Health of South Carolina. AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/documents/robert-m-brown-of-the-south-carolina-state-board-of-health-dust-study-of-the-mule-spinning-department-at-north-charleston-1938.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.