Asbestos Cases A–Z: 0–9

3 decisions whose name begins with 0–9.

• 1Up Floors, LLC v. Department of Labor & Industries (Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division, 2020). The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals' decision, upheld by the superior court, that 1Up Floors committed serious WISHA asbestos violations and that the Department's penalty calculations stood; 1Up lost.
• 80 S. 8th St. Ltd. Ptsp. v. Carey-Canada (Minnesota Supreme Court, 1992). Answering a certified question from the federal district court, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the economic loss doctrine does not bar the building owner, 80 South Eighth, from suing W.R. Grace in tort for asbestos fireproofing maintenance, removal and replacement costs; it did not reach the other two questions.
• 8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (New York Supreme Court, Erie, 2006). The court granted defendant Samuel, Son & Co.'s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint and cross claims, finding it owed no duty of care to Susan Rindfleisch and no strict liability applied.