No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Illinois Appellate Court: Asbestos Cases

Our case-law library holds 77 asbestos decisions from the Illinois Appellate Court (1979–2024). Each links to our summary and the full opinion.

  • State: Illinois
  • Kind of court: State appeals court

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

Decisions

  • Nelson v. Keene Corp. (1st District, 1st Division, 1996). The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's dismissal of the Nelson and Dunning actions for lack of jurisdiction, ruling for the defendant companies and against the plaintiffs.
  • WR Grace & Co. v. Csr Ltd. (3rd District, 1996). The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of CSR Limited's motion to dismiss, holding that Illinois courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over CSR in Helen Ensey's wrongful death suit.
  • Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (5th District, 1995). The appellate court affirmed the Madison County trial court's denial of Owens-Corning Fiberglas's motion to reconsider transfer to Massac County for forum non conveniens, so the plaintiff kept his chosen forum, and remanded the case.
  • Costa v. Dresser Industries, Inc. (3rd District, 1994). The appellate court affirmed the judgment for defendants A.P. Green, Sprinkmann Sons, E.D. Bullard, Dresser Industries, Magid Manufacturing and Fibreboard, rejecting the widow's claims of trial error and her sanctions request.
  • Hartman v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (5th District, 1994). The appellate court affirmed the Madison County judgment for the plaintiff (James Hartman's estate) against Pittsburgh Corning, including the punitive damages award, and rejected all of Pittsburgh Corning's claims of error.
  • Keystone Steel and Wire Co. v. Costa (3rd District, 1994). The appellate court affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning (including the new trial limited to wrongful death damages) and affirmed the denial of Keystone Steel & Wire's petitions for subpoena-compliance expenses, so the plaintiff and the trial court's rulings prevailed.
  • Kieffer and Co., Inc. v. Industrial Com'n (2nd District, Industrial Commission Division, 1994). The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgments confirming the Industrial Commission: Kieffer and Company stayed liable for the widow's death benefits, and the widow lost her claim for temporary total disability benefits.
  • US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1st District, 5th Division, 1994). The appellate court affirmed in part and reversed in part: it upheld the finding that the insurers must indemnify U.S. Gypsum for the eight school-building asbestos property damage cases and the exhaustion ruling for excess insurers, but rejected the discovery trigger and the multiple-occurrence ruling and remanded for a continuous trigger and a single occurrence per policy period.
  • Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (4th District, 1993). Affirmed the judgment on the $213,811.79 verdict for the plaintiff executor against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, upholding denial of OCF's motion to dismiss the civil conspiracy counts and the default judgment on liability entered as a sanction.
  • Campbell v. AC Equipment Services Corporation, Inc. (4th District, 1993). The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of the third-amended complaint, ruling for A.C. Equipment, Alemi, the City of Springfield and its employees against the five plaintiff workers, because no count adequately pleaded a cause of action.
  • Kurrack v. American Dist. Telegraph Co. (1st District, 5th Division, 1993). The appellate court affirmed the judgment entered on the jury verdict for American District Telegraph Co. against plaintiff Jane Kurrack, finding no reversible error in the jury instructions or evidentiary rulings.
  • Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Trust (4th District, 1992). The appellate court reversed the plaintiffs' jury judgments against the Manville Trust and against Grefco and remanded for new trials, but affirmed the dismissals, summary judgment, directed verdicts and setoff ruling that went against Dietrich, Smith, the Mendiolas and Stewart.
  • Whitney v. Industrial Com'n (4th District, Industrial Commission Division, 1992). The appellate court affirmed the Industrial Commission's dismissal of Velda Whitney's death-benefits claim against C. Iber & Sons as untimely, because her husband had no disablement within three years of his last asbestos exposure.
  • In re Asbestos Cases (1st District, 5th Division, 1991). The appellate court dismissed Allied Signal's appeal from the order creating the asbestos deferred registry for lack of jurisdiction, because the order was not an appealable injunction; the plaintiffs and the other defendants who supported the order prevailed.
  • Thacker v. Unr Industries, Inc. (4th District, 1991). The appellate court affirmed the jury verdict judgments for plaintiff Lois Thacker against the Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund, rejecting its requests for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial.
  • Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (4th District, 1991). The appellate court reversed all the judgments, both those for plaintiffs Wehmeier, Bratcher, Schultz and Cochran and those for the Fund against Gray and Tynan, and remanded for a new trial.
  • Leng v. Celotex Corp. (1st District, 1990). The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the market share liability counts against Celotex and the other defendants, refusing to adopt market share liability in Illinois asbestos cases.
  • Owens Corning Fiberglas v. Ind. Comm'n (4th District, 1990). The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, which upheld the Industrial Commission's death-benefit award to the widow, Charlotte Hammond, against Owens Corning Fiberglas and denied Owens Corning credit for her loss of consortium recovery.
  • Naden v. Celotex Corp. (1st District, 1989). The appellate court affirmed summary judgment for Celotex, Flintkote, Keene and Eagle-Picher because the plaintiff, the widow of a mesothelioma victim, offered no evidence that the defendants' products were used where her husband worked.
  • Blazek v. Nicolet, Inc. (1st District, 1988). Affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the strict liability counts against Nicolet and the other asbestos defendants as barred by the statute of repose; the plaintiff's estate lost.
  • H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (5th District, 1988). Affirmed the circuit court's confirmation of the Industrial Commission's award of temporary total disability and 10% permanent disability benefits to claimant Carl Wade against employer H & H Plumbing.
  • VaSalle v. Celotex Corp. (1st District, 1987). The appellate court reversed the trial court's summary judgment for the defendant asbestos-insulation companies and remanded, holding the estate's lung cancer claim was not shown to be time-barred.
  • Zupan v. Industrial Com. (5th District, 1986). The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's reversal of the Industrial Commission's denial of benefits, ruling for claimant Paul Zupan and against his employer National Steel.
  • Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1st District, 1986). The appellate court affirmed most of the trial court's coverage rulings in favor of Raymark, but modified and reversed in part for the insurers, holding that Zurich and the pre-1966 insurers had no duty to defend after exhausting their limits and clarifying that excess insurer Northbrook only pays defense costs against its limits.
  • Costello v. Unarco Industries, Inc. (4th District, 1984). The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of Marion Costello's strict liability counts as barred by the statute of repose and of her negligence counts as insufficiently pleaded, so the defendants, including H.K. Porter Company, won.
  • Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1st District, 1982). The appellate court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the punitive damages counts and remanded, ruling for the plaintiff administrators and against the asbestos defendants including Celotex.
  • Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1st District, 1979). The appellate court reversed the summary judgment that the circuit court had granted to all defendants on limitations grounds and remanded, so the plaintiff estate may proceed and a fact-finder will decide when Nolan knew or should have known of his asbestosis.

Cite this page

“Illinois Appellate Court: Asbestos Cases.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/cases/courts/illinois-appellate-court.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.