No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Testicular Mesothelioma: Asbestos Court Decisions

Decisions in our case-law library that involve testicular mesothelioma: 6 cases, by state. Each line gives the exposure the court described, or else what it decided. For the topic itself, see Testicular Mesothelioma.

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

California

  • Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2nd Appellate District, 7th Division, 2021). The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Soraya Sabetian (substituted for her late husband) against the Fluor defendants, upholding the denial of their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial.
  • Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2nd Appellate District, 7th Division, 2020). The Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for the Chevron and Exxon defendants, holding they owed no duty of care to Sabetian, and upheld discovery sanctions against Sabetian and his counsel in favor of the Exxon defendants.

New York

  • Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017). The court granted plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint to add a declaratory judgment claim against all insurers and a tortious interference claim against Resolute, and denied the amendment to add a GBL § 349 claim against the Resolute Defendants.
  • Konstantin v. Tishman Liquidating Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.) (1st Dept., 2014). The Appellate Division affirmed both jury-verdict judgments for the plaintiffs (Konstantin against Tishman Liquidating Corporation, Dummitt against Crane Co.) and dismissed the appeal from the order denying Crane's post-trial motion as subsumed in the judgment appeal; one justice, joined by another, dissented in part as to Dummitt.
  • Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assoc. (2012). The court denied Tishman Liquidating Corp.'s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and upheld liability and the economic damages, but vacated the $7 million and $12 million pain and suffering awards and ordered a new damages trial unless plaintiff Konstantin accepts reductions to $4.5 million and $3.5 million.

West Virginia

Cite this page

“Testicular Mesothelioma: Asbestos Court Decisions.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/cases/topics/meso-testicular.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.