You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A letter of August 15, 1935, from E. H. Jeffords of Raybestos-Manhattan's General Asbestos & Rubber Division at North Charleston, South Carolina, to Sumner Simpson, president of Raybestos-Manhattan, with a copy of the letter it enclosed. In that letter of August 13, Edward A. Barrier of the Arkwright Mutual Fire Insurance Company wrote that because of the "very low percentage of cotton" in the dust samples, neither sprinklers nor a tinned floor were needed in the dust tunnel, so long as the dust stayed like the samples; at the 10% cotton first used in the mix, protection would be required. Jeffords told Simpson this would lower the tunnel's cost, that the dust house should be finished that week, and that he felt "satisfied that we are going to obtain good results" from the burlap bags in Building No. 3.
- Author
- E. H. Jeffords; Edward A. Barrier
- Sent to
- Sumner Simpson
- Published by
- Raybestos-Manhattan
- Series
- The Sumner Simpson Papers
- Date
- August 15, 1935
- Number
- Simpson no. 02511-02512, 02508
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Letter, Jeffords to Simpson, August 15, 1935 · 1 pages · 82 KB
Read online Download the PDF Enclosure: letter (copy), Barrier to Jeffords, August 13, 1935 · 1 pages · 57 KB
What it shows
This closes the summer's exchange with the fire insurer over the North Charleston dust collection system. Jeffords also enclosed his reply to Barrier (Jeffords to Barrier, August 15), and he said that whether to build the tunnel would be discussed with Simpson later, as a question of cost against renewing the old piping.
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's attorneys indexed the Sumner Simpson Papers. Their index describes these documents as follows:
02511-02512. Transmittal letter for correspondence to and from Arkwright Mutual Fire Insurance re Dust Collecting System. Advises that company will not require sprinklers to be installed in the tunnel or a sheet metal floor. Dust house should be completed next week and burlap baffles can be tested then. Proposes a meeting to discuss construction of tunnel.
02508. States that in view of the low cotton content of the dust samples, it has been determined unnecessary to install sprinklers in the tunnel or to tin the floor. If, however, cotton content could ever be higher these precautions would be needed. Requests blueprint of tunnel construction.
Related documents
- E. H. Jeffords to Edward A. Barrier on the Cotton Content of the North Charleston Dust (1935)
- Carl G. Richmond of Arkwright Mutual to E. H. Jeffords with the Fire Test Report on the Asbestos-Cotton Dust (1935)
- E. H. Jeffords to Sumner Simpson on the Dust Settling Chamber and Arkwright Correspondence (1935)
About this copy
These are documents 02511-02512, 02508 of the Sumner Simpson Papers, as numbered in the collection's index.
Cited on this site
- Asbestos Timeline
- Carl G. Richmond of Arkwright Mutual to E. H. Jeffords with the Fire Test Report on the Asbestos-Cotton Dust (1935)
- E. H. Jeffords to Carl G. Richmond of Arkwright Mutual Sending the Dust Tunnel Blueprint (1935)
- E. H. Jeffords to Edward A. Barrier on the Cotton Content of the North Charleston Dust (1935)
- E. H. Jeffords to Sumner Simpson on the Fire Insurers' Review of the Charleston Dust Tunnel (1935)
- The Sumner Simpson Papers
Cite this document
“E. H. Jeffords to Sumner Simpson Enclosing Arkwright's Ruling That the Dust Tunnel Needs No Sprinklers.” August 15, 1935. The Sumner Simpson Papers, Simpson no. 02511-02512, 02508. Raybestos-Manhattan. AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/documents/e-h-jeffords-to-sumner-simpson-enclosing-arkwrights-ruling-that-the-dust-tunnel-needs-no-sprinklers-1935.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.