The ILO Classification is a standardized system for reading and grading chest X-rays for signs of pneumoconiosis, the lung scarring caused by inhaling dusts like asbestos. Trained readers score the size, shape, and extent of small opacities and note features such as pleural thickening, using a set scale and reference films. It gives doctors and courts a consistent way to describe how much dust-related disease an X-ray shows.
Origin
The system was developed by the International Labour Organization, which published its first classification of pneumoconiosis radiographs in the 1950s and has revised it periodically since. It was designed to make readings comparable across doctors, workplaces, and countries.
Significance in Asbestos Context
An ILO reading is often a key piece of medical evidence in asbestosis and pleural disease claims, because it turns a chest X-ray into a graded, comparable score. Readings are done by certified B-readers, physicians who have passed a NIOSH exam, and the profusion grade they assign can support or weaken a diagnosis of asbestosis. Because different readers can score the same film differently, both sides may obtain their own B-reader, so an independent, well-qualified reading matters. Ask your doctor whether your films have been read under the ILO system and by a certified B-reader.
Example Sentence
The B-reader classified the patient's chest film at profusion 1/1 under the ILO Classification, consistent with early asbestosis.
Related Terms
B-Reader, Asbestosis, Pleural Plaques, Profusion, Chest Radiograph, Pneumoconiosis
Notes
- Ask whether your chest X-rays were interpreted by a NIOSH-certified B-reader using the ILO system, since that carries weight in claims.
- Keep the actual X-ray films or digital images, not just the report, since another reader may need to re-examine them.
- Be aware that opposing readers may disagree; a second qualified B-reader can address a low or disputed profusion score.
In the research library
35 studies in our medical research library mention ILO Classification in the title or abstract. Among the most cited:
- Pleural lesions and the ILO classification: the need for a revisionG. Hillerdal, 1991 · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 10 times
- Radiographic readings for asbestosis: misuse of science--validation of the ILO classificationA. Miller, 2007 · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 7 times
- Asbestos-related radiographic changes by ILO classification of 10 x 10 cm chest X-rays in a screening of the general populationB. Hilt, G. Hillerdal, P.G. Lund-Larsen, et al, 1995 · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · cited 5 times
- Does the 1980 ILO classification of pneumoconiosis need a facelift?K.H. Kilburn, 1988 · Archives of Environmental Health · cited 3 times
- Interobserver variations in diagnosing asbestosis according to the ILO classificationI. Perić, K. Novak, I. Barisić, et al, 2009 · Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju · cited 2 times
The journals that publish most on it: British Journal of Industrial Medicine (9), American Journal of Industrial Medicine (7), International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (3).
Category: Diagnostic Tools & Biomarkers · All Lexicon terms A–Z
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.