The midget impinger was the standard instrument for measuring workplace dust from the 1930s into the 1960s. It drew air through a glass tube into liquid, where the dust was trapped; a technician then counted all particles under a light microscope and reported the result in millions of particles per cubic foot of air (mppcf).
Origin
The impinger was developed by Greenburg and Smith in the 1920s, and the smaller "midget" version by the U.S. Bureau of Mines in the 1930s. It was used in the U.S. Public Health Service's 1938 study of asbestos textile plants, which led to the recommendation of 5 mppcf as a dust limit.
Significance in Asbestos Context
The impinger counted every particle, not asbestos fibers, and could not see the thinnest fibers, so its results cannot be converted precisely into today's fiber counts. Defendants have relied on companies' compliance with the 5 mppcf guideline to argue that workplaces were considered safe; plaintiffs point out that the limit was known to be uncertain and that disease kept appearing in plants that met it. Old impinger surveys remain important historical evidence of how dusty a workplace was and of what a company measured and knew.
Example Sentence
The 1952 survey used a midget impinger and reported 12 mppcf at the carding machines, more than twice the accepted limit.
Related Terms
Air Sampling, Threshold Limit Value (TLV), Industrial Hygiene, Quebec Standard Test, Exposure Reconstruction, Personal Breathing Zone Sample
Notes
- Historical dust surveys are often in company files and Bureau of Mines or state records; ask your lawyers whether any exist for your workplace.
- Impinger counts are not fiber counts. Be wary of any expert who converts them without explaining the uncertainty.
In the research library
5 studies in our medical research library mention Midget Impinger in the title or abstract. Among the most cited:
- A comparison of impinger and membrane filter techniques for evaluating air samples in asbestos plantsH.E. Ayer, J.R. Lynch, J.H. Fanney, 1965 · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · cited 24 times
- Dust exposure and mortality in an American chrysotile asbestos friction products plantA.D. McDonald, J.S. Fry, A.J. Woolley, et al, 1984 · British Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 140 times
- Estimates of historical exposures by phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy in North Carolina USA asbestos textile plantsJ.M. Dement, D. Myers, D. Loomis, et al, 2009 · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · cited 29 times
- The assessment of exposure in terms of fibresG.W. Gibbs, 1994 · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene · cited 6 times
- Updates on exposure estimation for the Québec cohort of chrysotile miners and millers: implications for risk assessment and threshold hypothesisB.W. Case, A.A. Korchevskiy, A. Korchevskiy, 2025 · Frontiers in Public Health · cited 1 times
The journals that publish most on it: British Journal of Industrial Medicine (1), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1), The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (1).
Category: Analytical & Forensic Methods · All Lexicon terms A–Z
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.