Non-asbestiform describes a mineral that has the same chemistry as an asbestos mineral but grew in an ordinary crystal shape (blocky, prismatic or columnar) rather than as fine, flexible fibers. Crushing non-asbestiform minerals produces cleavage fragments, some of which are long and thin enough to look like fibers.
Origin
Mineralogists distinguish a mineral's species (its chemistry and structure) from its habit (the shape in which it grows). The term came into regulatory use in the 1970s and 1980s, when mining interests argued that crushed non-asbestiform tremolite, actinolite and anthophyllite should not be regulated as asbestos. OSHA agreed in 1992 and removed the non-asbestiform forms of those minerals from its asbestos standards.
Significance in Asbestos Context
Defendants in talc, taconite, vermiculite and stone cases often argue that the amphibole particles found in a product or in lung tissue were non-asbestiform cleavage fragments rather than asbestos. Plaintiffs' experts respond that the health hazard depends on the size and shape of the particles that are breathed in, not on how the parent crystal grew, and that many products contain both forms. The distinction is made under the microscope from features such as fiber bundles, splayed ends, curvature and the width distribution of the particles.
Example Sentence
The defense mineralogist testified that the tremolite in the talc was non-asbestiform and broke into cleavage fragments, while the plaintiff's expert counted bundles with splayed ends typical of asbestiform fibers.
Related Terms
Asbestiform, Habit, Cleavage Fragment, Fibrous Habit, Tremolite, Elongate Mineral Particles (EMPs), Regulated Asbestos
Notes
- In talc and mineral cases, expect this argument; ask whether your experts have examined the actual particles under TEM.
- Preserve product samples, packaging and any test reports; the habit argument turns on physical evidence.
In the research library
47 studies in our medical research library mention Non-Asbestiform in the title or abstract. Among the most cited:
- Assessment of the pathogenic potential of asbestiform vs. nonasbestiform particulates (cleavage fragments) in in vitro (cell or organ culture) models and bioassaysB.T. Mossman, 2008 · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · cited 50 times
- Differentiating non-asbestiform amphibole and amphibole asbestos by size characteristicsM. Harper, E.G. Lee, S.S. Doorn, et al, 2008 · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · cited 27 times
- Methodologies for determining the sources, characteristics, distribution, and abundance of asbestiform and nonasbestiform amphibole and serpentine in ambient air and waterA.G. Wylie, P.A. Candela, 2015 · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews · cited 22 times
- Non-asbestiform elongate mineral particles and mesothelioma risk: Human and experimental evidenceJ.E. Goodman, M.J. Becich, D.M. Bernstein, et al, 2023 · Environmental Research · cited 12 times
- Carving of non-asbestiform tremolite and the risk of lung cancer: a follow-up mortality study in a historical nephrite processing cohortH.Y. Yang, R.H. Shie, P.C. Chen, 2013 · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · cited 10 times
The journals that publish most on it: Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (5), Environmental Research (5), Inhalation Toxicology (4).
Category: Mineralogical Concepts · All Lexicon terms A–Z
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.