Point counting is a way of measuring how much asbestos is in a bulk sample under a polarized light microscope. The analyst looks at a set number of points (often 400) spread across the sample and records how many land on asbestos fibers; the share of points gives the percentage of asbestos.
Origin
Point counting is an established technique in petrography for estimating mineral proportions. EPA built it into its bulk-sample methods for asbestos, and under the asbestos NESHAP a sample whose asbestos content is visually estimated at less than 10 percent may be point counted to confirm whether it is above or below the 1 percent regulatory threshold.
Significance in Asbestos Context
Most labs report asbestos content by visual estimation, which is fast but subjective, especially near the 1 percent line that decides whether a material is regulated. Point counting is more objective but still has limits: very thin fibers below the resolution of the light microscope are missed, and results depend on sample preparation. Low or "trace" results in old surveys are sometimes used to argue that a product was effectively asbestos-free; a point count, or TEM analysis, can show otherwise.
Example Sentence
The visual estimate was "less than 1 percent," but a 400-point count found 2.5 percent chrysotile, making the floor tile a regulated asbestos-containing material.
Related Terms
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), Bulk Sample Analysis, EPA Method 600/R-93/116, PLM Detection Limit, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), NESHAP
Notes
- If a lab report says "trace" or "less than 1 percent," ask whether a point count or TEM analysis was done.
- Keep the original lab reports, chain-of-custody forms and any remaining sample material.
In the research library
4 studies in our medical research library mention Point Counting in the title or abstract. Among the most cited:
- Patterns of histopathological change determined by the point counting method and its application for the hazard assessment of respirable dustA. Ogami, Y. Morimoto, H. Yamato, et al, 2004 · Inhalation Toxicology · cited 18 times
- Histopathological changes in rat lung following intratracheal instillation of silicon carbide whiskers and potassium octatitanate whiskersA. Ogami, Y. Morimoto, T. Myojo, et al, 2007 · Inhalation Toxicology · cited 17 times
- Experimental asbestosis: an investigation of functional and pathological disturbances. I. Methods, control animals and exposure conditionsD.M. Hiett, 1978 · British Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 11 times
- Experimental asbestosis: an investigation of functional and pathological disturbances. II. Results for chrysotile and amosite exposuresD.M. Hiett, 1978 · British Journal of Industrial Medicine · cited 11 times
The journals that publish most on it: Inhalation Toxicology (2), British Journal of Industrial Medicine (2).
Category: Analytical & Forensic Methods · All Lexicon terms A–Z
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.