The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) is a U.S. federal law, passed in 1976, that gives the Environmental Protection Agency authority to regulate chemicals, including asbestos. Under TSCA the EPA can require testing, restrict uses, and ban dangerous substances. It's the law behind major EPA actions on asbestos.
Origin
Congress enacted TSCA in 1976 to fill gaps in earlier environmental laws by regulating chemicals in commerce. The EPA's 1989 asbestos ban under TSCA was largely overturned by a federal court in 1991, and TSCA was significantly amended in 2016.
Significance in Asbestos Context
For patients, TSCA's history helps show that regulators recognized asbestos hazards yet struggled for decades to ban it. The EPA's 1989 ban was mostly struck down in the 1991 Corrosion Proof Fittings case, so many asbestos products remained legal far longer than the public assumed. This regulatory timeline can matter in a case, because it documents what was known, when, and why products were still on the market during years of exposure. The 2016 amendments and later EPA rules continued the effort to restrict remaining asbestos uses.
Example Sentence
His attorneys cited the failed 1989 TSCA ban to show that asbestos products he worked with in the 1990s were still legally sold despite known dangers.
Related Terms
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA, Clean Air Act, Asbestos Ban, Government Regulations
Notes
- Compare the dates of your exposure against the regulatory timeline; many products stayed legal after 1989.
- Your legal team can use regulatory records to show what manufacturers knew about asbestos hazards.
- The 2016 TSCA amendments and later EPA asbestos rules may be relevant to more recent exposures.
In the research library
6 studies in our medical research library mention Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in the title or abstract. Among the most cited:
- Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interimS.A. Vogel, J.A. Roberts, 2011 · Health Affairs · cited 26 times
- Approaches to characterizing human health risks of exposure to fibersV.T. Vu, D.Y. Lai, 1997 · Environmental Health Perspectives · cited 15 times
- Systematic review of the scientific evidence of the pulmonary carcinogenicity of talcH.N. Lynch, D.J. Lauer, W.J. Thompson, et al, 2022 · Frontiers in Public Health · cited 12 times
- "Ain't Necessarily So!": The Brake Industry's Impact on Asbestos Regulation in the 1970sD. Rosner, G. Markowitz, 2017 · American Journal of Public Health · cited 4 times
- US EPA's TSCA risk assessment approach: a case study of asbestos in automotive brakesD.G. Dodge, A.M. Engel, R.L. Prueitt, et al, 2021 · Inhalation Toxicology · cited 2 times
The journals that publish most on it: Inhalation Toxicology (1), American Journal of Public Health (1), Environmental Health Perspectives (1).
Category: Government Regulations & Policies · All Lexicon terms A–Z
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.