No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

A case of malignant mesothelioma pleural effusion with MOC-31, BerEP4, and calretinin expression

Our plain-English summary of A case of malignant mesothelioma pleural effusion with MOC-31, BerEP4, and calretinin expression, by P. Zhao (Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2019).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Author: P. Zhao
  • Journal: Diagnostic Cytopathology
  • Published: 2019;47(12):1321-1323
  • Type of article: Case report, Letter
  • Cited by: 1 article, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher

In plain English

This letter to the editor described one patient, an 80-year-old man with cough, left-sided chest pain and shortness of breath. His chest scan showed a large left pleural effusion, a build-up of fluid around the lung. The letter did not mention asbestos exposure. Cells in the drained fluid stained positive for MOC-31, BerEP4, calretinin and CK7, and a diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma was first made based on the MOC-31 and BerEP4 results. Later scans were most consistent with mesothelioma. A needle biopsy showed sarcomatoid tumor cells, which were first diagnosed as poorly differentiated carcinoma with sarcomatoid features. A national academic institution then found the cells focally positive for D2-40 and diagnosed sarcomatoid mesothelioma. The author suggested the tumor may have had both epithelioid and sarcomatoid parts. The author concluded that knowing a small subset of malignant mesotheliomas express MOC-31 and BerEP4 can prevent misdiagnosis as adenocarcinoma. The author recommended using panels of markers together with clinical and imaging findings. Claudin-4 staining, which the author said might have helped, was not available in the author's laboratory.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: case report (letter to the editor)
  • Who was studied: One 80-year-old man with gastroesophageal reflux disease and hypertension who had a persistent cough for a month, left-sided chest pain and shortness of breath; the author is from the Department of Pathology, Washington Adventist Hospital, Takoma Park, Maryland
  • Main results:
    • Malignant cells in the pleural fluid cell block were positive for MOC-31, BerEP4, calretinin (mostly nuclear staining) and CK7
    • A diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma was first made based on the MOC-31 and BerEP4 results
    • Later CT and PET imaging showed left pleural thickening and masses, with no lymph node or other metastasis, and these findings were most consistent with mesothelioma
    • A CT-guided needle biopsy showed sarcomatoid malignant cells; because all mesothelial markers tested were negative, a diagnosis of poorly differentiated carcinoma with sarcomatoid features was made
    • At a national academic institution, tumor cells were positive for AE1/AE3 and focally for D2-40, negative for calretinin, WT1, CK5/6 and mesothelin, with retained BAP1 expression; sarcomatoid mesothelioma was diagnosed
    • The author suggested the tumor may have had both an epithelioid component (seen in the pleural fluid) and a sarcomatoid component (seen in the needle biopsy)
  • The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that awareness that a small subset of malignant mesotheliomas express MOC-31 and BerEP4 can prevent misdiagnosis as adenocarcinoma, that no marker definitively excludes malignant mesothelioma, and that panels of markers along with clinical and radiologic correlation should be used
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • Claudin-4 antibodies, which the author said may have helped exclude adenocarcinoma, were not available in the author's laboratory

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Malignant Mesothelioma, Pleural Effusion, MOC-31, Calretinin.

Browse more research in Diagnostic Cytopathology, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

P. Zhao. A case of malignant mesothelioma pleural effusion with MOC-31, BerEP4, and calretinin expression. Diagnostic Cytopathology 2019;47(12):1321-1323. doi:10.1002/dc.24315. PMID: 31609089.

Cite our summary

“A case of malignant mesothelioma pleural effusion with MOC-31, BerEP4, and calretinin expression.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/a-case-of-malignant-mesothelioma-pleural-effusion-with-moc-31-berep4.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.