A clinical diagnostic model for the assessment of asbestosis: a new algorithmic approach

Our plain-English summary of A clinical diagnostic model for the assessment of asbestosis: a new algorithmic approach, by A. Schwartz, S.D. Rockoff, D. Christiani, et al (Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 1988).

The study

• Authors: A. Schwartz, S.D. Rockoff, D. Christiani, J. Hyde
• Journal: Journal of Thoracic Imaging
• Published: 1988;3(4):29-35
• Cited by: 1 article, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher
• In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 000935).

Abstract

Asbestosis, one of the pneumoconioses that is defined by a set of clinical, radiographic, and pathologic findings, occurs as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers. Several approaches have attempted to describe the presence, progression, or extent of asbestosis. However, these approaches have attempted to describe the presence, progression, or extent of asbestosis. However, these approaches have limitations or lack correlations with other diagnostic modalities. We propose a comprehensive clinical diagnostic model that uses the sensitivities and specificities of the various clinical, radiographic, and pathologic findings to generate a set of "likelihood numbers." These likelihood numbers, contribute to the calculation of a value that can indicate the probability of asbestosis. The clinical diagnostic model is heuristic in that a specific feature supportive of the diagnosis of asbestosis may be tested as to its sensitivity and specificity, and new features may be added to the model. The model also indicates how probabilistic a given set of findings is in the diagnosis of asbestosis and suggests what additional data may make the diagnosis more or less statistically probable. Regarding the radiologic considerations of asbestosis, the strength of the clinical diagnostic model is that it is capable of supporting a diagnosis of asbestosis in the presence of a normal chest radiograph and, conversely, may reject the diagnosis of asbestosis despite the radiographic finding of pulmonary fibrosis.

In plain English

This article proposed a scoring method for estimating how likely a person is to have asbestosis. It did not study real patients. It starts from a prior probability based on exposure history and adds positive or negative "likelihood numbers" for findings present or absent, based on their sensitivity and specificity. The authors illustrated it with three fictional cases. The first, a pipe-installing dockworker, had cough, rales, restrictive lung function, decreased diffusing capacity, pleural plaques and thickening, but an ILO score of 0/0. With biopsy findings (pleural and peribronchiolar fibrosis, an occasional asbestos body) added and an arbitrarily assumed 1% prior, his probability was about 0.9. A second worker had most classic X-ray features. With a 1% prior, the final sum was +10.7, a probability greater than 0.99. A third, a heavy smoker with brief "bystander" exposure five years earlier and X-ray fibrosis without plaques, had a presumed prior below one in a thousand, a final sum of -4.2 and a probability less than 0.02. The authors stated that many sensitivity and specificity values were arbitrary and that the method assumes independent tests.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Proposal of a diagnostic scoring model (methods article), illustrated with three fictional cases; no real patients were studied
• Who was studied: No real population; three fictional cases: a 60-year-old dockworker who installed pipes for 40 years, a man with occupational asbestos exposure and classic radiographic findings, and a middle-aged heavy smoker with brief bystander exposure
• Exposure: Asbestos exposure in general (no fiber types named); in the model, exposure history (extent, intensity, duration and latency) sets the prior odds of asbestosis
• Main results:
  • Fictional case 1 (dockworker with cough, rales, restrictive pattern, decreased diffusing capacity, pleural plaques and thickening but no interstitial opacities, ILO 0/0): clinical and radiographic sum +6.4. Biopsy findings of pleural fibrosis, peribronchiolar fibrosis and an occasional asbestos body raised it to +6.6. With an arbitrarily assumed prior probability of 0.01, the final sum of +2.0 corresponded to a probability of about 0.9 of asbestosis
  • Fictional case 2 (most classical radiographic features present, no pathology): likelihood score +15.3, final sum +10.7 with prior probability 0.01, corresponding to a probability greater than 0.99
  • Fictional case 3 (heavy smoker, brief bystander exposure five years earlier, radiographic pulmonary fibrosis without pleural findings): score +2.7, presumed prior probability less than one in a thousand (logit -6.9), final sum -4.2, posterior probability less than 0.02
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the model's strength is that it can support a diagnosis of asbestosis when the chest radiograph is normal, and can reject the diagnosis despite radiographic pulmonary fibrosis
• Limitations the authors state:
  • Many of the sensitivity and specificity values used in the examples are arbitrary, so the odds results may be disputed
  • The method assumes the tests are independent, which the authors say is unlikely to be exactly correct for any pair of tests
  • The prior probability in the worked example was assumed arbitrarily

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Chest X-Ray, Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Related studies

• Diffusion-weighted MRI of malignant pleural mesothelioma: preliminary assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in histologic subtypes — R.R. Gill, S. Umeoka, et al. (2010)
• A regional approach for CAR T-cell therapy for mesothelioma: from mouse models to clinical trial — M. Mayor, M. Zeltsman, et al. (2016)
• Pleural plaques and exposure to asbestos: a mathematical model — B. Järvholm (1992)
• Evaluation of the Webler-Brown model for estimating tetrachloroethylene exposure from vinyl-lined asbestos-cement pipes — L.A. Spence, A. Aschengrau, et al. (2008)
• Rural public health policy models to address an evolving environmental asbestos disaster — S.W. Kuntz, C.A. Winters, et al. (2009)
• Comparison of feasibility and estimates of central and peripheral nitric oxide parameters by different mathematical models — T. Karvonen, H. Kankaanranta, et al. (2017)

Browse more research in Journal of Thoracic Imaging, or return to medical research.