A novel method for efficient collection of normal mesothelial cells in vivo

Our plain-English summary of A novel method for efficient collection of normal mesothelial cells in vivo, by L. Jiang, Y. Yamashita, S. Toyokuni (Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, 2010).

The study

• Authors: L. Jiang, Y. Yamashita, S. Toyokuni
• Journal: Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
• Published: 2010;46(3):265-8
• Cited by: 9 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

Abstract

Asbestos-induced mesothelioma is a challenging social problem in many countries, and oxidative stress via iron is closely associated with its carcinogenesis. Mesothelioma is thought to originate from the mesothelial cells that cover the somatic cavity such as pleural, pericardial and peritoneal cavities. They are single layered and so flat that it is extremely difficult to obtain pure mesothelial cells as control samples from experimental animals. Here we describe a novel method to collect mesothelial cells from animals by the use of simple equipments. Surface of the most organs including lung, spleen and liver are covered with a single layer of mesothelial cells. Scraping the surface of those organs with razor blades after snap-freeze in liquid nitrogen satisfactorily confers almost pure population of mesothelial cells. This simple method would be helpful for obtaining mesothelial control samples from animals to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of a variety of mesothelial pathology.

In plain English

This article described a laboratory technique; it did not study people or asbestos exposure. The authors wanted a way to collect normal mesothelial cells (the single flat cell layer covering organs) from laboratory animals, to use as comparison samples in mesothelioma research. They froze fresh organs from eight-week-old Brown-Norway rats in liquid nitrogen, placed them on dry ice, and scraped each spot once with a chilled razor blade. Under the microscope, scraped surfaces had lost their mesothelial cells. Podoplanin, a protein marker of these cells, stained the intact surface layer but not the scraped areas. A protein test found high podoplanin in the scraped samples and low levels in the remaining organ tissue. The authors obtained about 25 mg of protein from half a liver, 10 mg from one kidney and 8 mg from a spleen. Scraping off visible tissue fragments caused heavy contamination by other cells. The authors concluded that the technique collected mesothelial cells efficiently. They suggested that it might also work on human samples, which they did not test.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: laboratory methods study in animals (rats), describing and checking a technique for collecting mesothelial cells
• Who was studied: Eight-week-old Brown-Norway rats at Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan (number of rats not reported); cells were scraped from spleen, liver and kidney. Cultured rat cell lines served as comparison samples: immortalized rat peritoneal mesothelial cells and NRK52E kidney cells.
• Exposure: No asbestos or other exposure was studied. Asbestos-induced mesothelioma is mentioned only as background for why the method is needed.
• Main results:
  • Protein collected from scraped organ surfaces, although not the whole surface of each organ was scraped: approximately 25 mg from half a liver, 10 mg from one kidney and 8 mg from a spleen.
  • In rat organ sections, the intact surface layer of mesothelial cells stained for podoplanin, while scraped surfaces showed no staining.
  • On western blot, high levels of podoplanin were detected in each scraped mesothelial cell sample (and in the mesothelial positive-control cell line). Low levels were found in the remaining parenchymal tissue of the same organs.
  • When scraping removed visible tissue fragments, the sample was heavily contaminated with other organ cells.
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that mesothelial cells were efficiently collected from fresh organs with this technique. They suggested it would be possible to apply it to human samples.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelial Cells, Mesothelioma, Oxidative Stress, Carcinogenesis, Pericardial, Pathology.

Related studies

• Identification of a differential expression of two cDNAs between malignant mesothelioma and normal mesothelial cells using the RNA fingerprint method — S. Frank, B.U. von Specht, et al. (1998)
• Evaluation of two distinct methods to quantify the uptake of crocidolite fibers by mesothelial cells — K. Yamashita, H. Nagai, et al. (2013)
• Raw single-wall carbon nanotubes induce oxidative stress and activate MAPKs, AP-1, NF-kappaB, and Akt in normal and malignant human mesothelial cells — M. Pacurari, X.J. Yin, et al. (2008)
• Calretinin. A selective marker of normal and neoplastic mesothelial cells in serous effusions — M.C. Barberis, M. Faleri, et al. (1997)
• DNA breakage in asbestos-treated normal and transformed (TSV40) rat pleural mesothelial cells — V. Levresse, A. Renier, et al. (2000)
• In vitro sensitivity of normal human mesothelial and malignant mesothelioma cell lines to four new chemotherapeutic agents — T. Ollikainen, A. Knuuttila, et al. (2000)

Browse more research in Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, or return to medical research.