Our plain-English summary of Asbestos: further steps towards reducing the risks (Lancet, 1983).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Journal: Lancet
- Published: 1983;2(8349):563
- Cited by: 1 article, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed
- In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 001732).
In plain English
This unsigned Lancet commentary was not a research study. It reported recommendations of the UK Health and Safety Commission. A medical report by Prof E. D. Acheson and Dr M. J. Gardner concluded that banning the manufacture and importation of new blue or brown asbestos products should be considered, and that all asbestos use should be curtailed as safer substitutes became available. The commission recommended lower workplace control limits from Aug 1, 1984. For brown asbestos the limit would fall from 0.5 to 0.2 fibres per ml of air, and for white asbestos from 1.0 to 0.5 fibres per ml. Blue asbestos would remain at 0.2 fibres per ml of air for the time being. The commission decided that marketing and use of brown and blue asbestos and their products should be prohibited from June 1, 1984. Asbestos removal work, with some exceptions, would need a licence from the Health and Safety Executive. The commentary noted that the general environment still lacked specific limits, and that the commission's tone hardly suggested a resolve to act with great urgency.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: News commentary/editorial (Community Health section) reporting regulatory recommendations; not a research study
- Who was studied: No study population; the article concerns recommendations of the UK Health and Safety Commission on workplace asbestos controls, 1983
- Exposure: Workplace asbestos, described as blue, brown and white asbestos; workplace control limits in fibres/ml of air; asbestos removal work
- Main results:
- The Acheson and Gardner medical report concluded that a formal prohibition of the manufacture and importation of new blue or brown asbestos products should be considered, and that use of all asbestos should be curtailed as safer substitutes become available
- The commission recommended reducing workplace control limits for brown asbestos from 0.5 to 0.2 fibres/ml of air and for white asbestos from 1.0 to 0.5 fibres/ml. The limit for blue asbestos would remain at 0.2 fibres/ml for the time being
- The new limits would not apply until Aug 1, 1984, though employers were expected to comply earlier where possible
- The commission decided that marketing and use of brown and blue asbestos and their products should be prohibited from June 1, 1984
- Before brown asbestos could be banned, there had to be discussion with other Government departments of the implications to the United Kingdom
- All asbestos removal work would require a licence from the HSE, unless done by an employer with their own workforce on their own premises and notified to the enforcing authority
- The authors' conclusion: The commentary stated that the lack of control limits for the general environment remained a concern, and that the commission's tone hardly suggested a resolve to act with great urgency
Topics
The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis.
Related studies
- Practical steps towards the prevention of bronchial carcinoma — R. Doll (1970)
- Dissolution Reaction and Surface Modification of UICC Amosite in Mimicked Gamble's Solution: A Step towards Filling the Gap between Asbestos Toxicity and Its Crystal Chemical Features — A. Pacella, P. Ballirano, et al. (2023)
- Personalized Oncolytic Therapy: The Next Step Toward the Successful Clinical Application of Vaccine-Strain Measles Viruses for Cancer Therapy? — T. Peikert (2020)
- Reducing environmental risk associated with laboratory decommissioning and property transfer — R. Dufault, E. Abelquist, et al. (2000)
- Further evidence of an excess of risk of pleural malignant mesothelioma in textile workers in Prato (Italy) — E. Paci, M. Zappa, et al. (1991)
- Residential proximity to naturally occurring asbestos and mesothelioma risks: further consideration of exposure misclassification and occupational confounding — M.A. Kelsh, D.W. Berman, et al. (2006)
Browse more research in Lancet, or return to medical research.
How to cite it
Cite the study
Asbestos: further steps towards reducing the risks. Lancet 1983;2(8349):563. PMID: 6136707.
Cite our summary
“Asbestos: further steps towards reducing the risks.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestos-further-steps-towards-reducing-the-risks.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.