No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Asbestos inhalation and nonmalignant abnormalities of the chest

Our plain-English summary of Asbestos inhalation and nonmalignant abnormalities of the chest, by P.E. Epstein (Seminars in Roentgenology, 1992).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Author: P.E. Epstein
  • Journal: Seminars in Roentgenology
  • Published: 1992;27(2):85-93
  • Type of article: Review
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher
  • In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 004966).

In plain English

This 1992 article by a University of Pennsylvania physician was a narrative review, not a new study. It collected no data of its own. It described asbestos fiber types, how workers were exposed, what happens to fibers in the lung, nonmalignant chest disease, diagnosis and treatment. The author wrote that the delay between first exposure and disease is typically 20 years or more. Citing earlier studies, the author reported that estimates of pleural thickening after occupational exposure ranged from 10% to 60% among various populations. The author stated that pleural plaques and mild-to-moderate pleural thickening cause no symptoms. Benign asbestos pleural effusions were described as sometimes appearing as early as 5 years after first exposure. The author argued that the term asbestosis should be reserved for fibrosis of the lung tissue itself and not used for pleural plaques. The author also stated that steroids and immunosuppressive drugs do not help asbestosis. Relying on cited work, the author wrote that there is no evidence fibrotic disease will occur at the OSHA limit of 0.2 fibers per cubic centimeter. The author concluded that precision in diagnosis and in the language used to describe it is particularly important.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: narrative review
  • Who was studied: No study population. The article reviewed published literature (29 references) on asbestos exposure and nonmalignant chest disease.
  • Exposure: Asbestos in general. Covers chrysotile (serpentine; said to be about 90% of commercial use in the United States) and the amphiboles crocidolite, amosite, anthophyllite, tremolite and actinolite. Described exposure settings were asbestos textile manufacture, shipbuilding, the insulation trades, and household exposure from work clothes.
  • Main results:
    • The author described the latency period for asbestos-related chest abnormalities as typically 20 years or more.
    • Citing other studies, the author reported estimates of pleural thickening after occupational asbestos exposure ranging from 10% to 60% among various populations.
    • The author stated that pleural plaques and mild-to-moderate pleural thickening produce no symptoms. Severe, extensive pleural fibrosis that restricts lung expansion was described as a rare exception.
    • Benign asbestos-related pleural effusions were described as occurring sometimes as early as 5 years after initial exposure.
    • The author stated that the term asbestosis should be reserved for fibrosis of the lung tissue, not pleural thickening or plaques.
    • The author stated that steroids and immunosuppressive agents are ineffective for asbestosis.
    • Relying on cited work, the author stated there is no evidence that fibrotic disease will occur at the OSHA exposure limit of 0.2 fibers per cubic centimeter of air.
  • The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that precision in diagnosis, and in the language used to communicate the diagnosis, is particularly important for asbestos-related changes.

Browse more research in Seminars in Roentgenology, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

P.E. Epstein. Asbestos inhalation and nonmalignant abnormalities of the chest. Seminars in Roentgenology 1992;27(2):85-93. doi:10.1016/0037-198x(92)90051-3. PMID: 1609304.

Cite our summary

“Asbestos inhalation and nonmalignant abnormalities of the chest.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestos-inhalation-and-nonmalignant-abnormalities-of-the-chest.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.