Our plain-English summary of Asbestos-related disease without asbestosis--why not pleural asbestosis?, by T. Beritić, S. Kovac (American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1985).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: T. Beritić, S. Kovac
- Journal: American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Published: 1985;8(6):517-20
- Type of article: Editorial
- Cited by: 1 article, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
- In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 001217).
In plain English
This article was an editorial, not a research study, and it reported no new data. The authors, writing from Zagreb, Yugoslavia, argued that pleural changes caused by asbestos should be called "pleural asbestosis." These are changes in the pleura, the lining around the lungs, such as effusion, plaques, thickening and calcification. They explained that the word "asbestosis" usually meant fibrosis (scarring) inside the lungs. They noted that British authors rejected the term "pleural asbestosis," while some US authors used it. The authors had proposed in 1984 that "asbestosis" should name the kind of disease process, not its site. They gave clinical, epidemiological, pathological and legal grounds for their view, drawing partly on other researchers' published work. They argued that the pleural changes are a disease of their own, not just a sign of exposure. They noted that Yugoslav law certified pleural and lung changes equally. The authors concluded that accepting the term would help sick workers obtain their legal rights more easily.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Editorial (opinion piece on medical terminology); no new data reported
- Who was studied: No study population. The authors discussed terminology and diagnostic and legal criteria for certifying asbestosis in Yugoslavia, with reference to British and US literature.
- Exposure: Asbestos exposure in general; no specific fiber types, products, jobs or doses were discussed
- Main results:
- The authors had earlier proposed that "asbestosis" should describe the kind of disease process, not where in the body it occurs.
- The authors stated that pleural changes caused by asbestos appear to be an independent pleural disease, not merely a sign of exposure or a complication of pulmonary asbestosis.
- The authors reported that British authors reject the term "pleural asbestosis."
- The authors reported that Selikoff and colleagues used the terms "pulmonary asbestosis" and "pleural asbestosis."
- The authors stated that Yugoslav law does not distinguish between pleural and pulmonary changes in asbestosis, or between unilateral and bilateral pleural changes, and certifies them equally.
- The authors criticized the British proposal's requirement of "sufficient bilateral thickening" for certifying pleural asbestosis as not well founded.
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that accepting the term "pleural asbestosis" would match clinical and scientific observations and would help sick workers obtain their legal rights more easily.
Topics
The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis, Pleural plaques and thickening.
Related studies
- Asbestos related diseases without asbestosis — D. Davies (1983)
- Asbestos-related pleural disease and asbestosis: a comparison of CT and chest radiography — A.C. Friedman, S.B. Fiel, et al. (1988)
- Pulmonary function in asbestosis and asbestos-related pleural disease — A. Miller (1993)
- Lung crackle characteristics in patients with asbestosis, asbestos-related pleural disease and left ventricular failure using a time-expanded waveform analysis--a comparative study — N. al Jarad, S.W. Davies, et al. (1994)
- Worker-sponsored survey for asbestosis: detection of occupational lung disease without a control group — D.H. Wegman, G.P. Theriault, et al. (1973)
- The additional risk of malignant mesothelioma in former workers and residents of Wittenoom with benign pleural disease or asbestosis — A. Reid, N. de Klerk, et al. (2005)
Browse more research in American Journal of Industrial Medicine, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
T. Beritić, S. Kovac. Asbestos-related disease without asbestosis--why not pleural asbestosis? American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1985;8(6):517-20. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700080603. PMID: 4073050.
Cite our summary
“Asbestos-related disease without asbestosis--why not pleural asbestosis?” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestos-related-disease-without-asbestosis-why-not-pleural-asbestosis.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.