Asbestosis As Differentiated From Other Pneumoconioses

Our plain-English summary of Asbestosis As Differentiated From Other Pneumoconioses, by O.A. Sander (1955).

The study

• Author: O.A. Sander
• Published: Archives Of Industrial Health 11(3):208-211, March (1955)
• Type of article: Journal article
• Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library, J-M no. 001874. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This article is the text of a talk the author gave at a 1953 symposium on occupational lung diseases in Boston. It is a clinical commentary with case descriptions, not a formal study. The author argued that well-defined asbestosis looks distinctive on chest X-rays. The author described other conditions that can be mistaken for it and named poor film technique as the commonest cause of misdiagnosis. The author reported that eight physicians on a committee advising members of the Asbestos Textile Institute reviewed sample films. They agreed fairly well on the more advanced stages of asbestosis but practically not at all on borderline degrees, and the group concluded that a first-stage case cannot be clearly defined. The author also described a 57-year-old railroad shop repairman whose physician had diagnosed asbestosis. His autopsy showed a congenital cystic lung with fibrosis from long-standing infection and nothing resembling asbestosis bodies. The author concluded that every possible cause of chest-film findings must be considered, because poorly studied cases can cause irreversible harm to patients.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Symposium paper: clinical commentary on diagnosis, with a committee film review and individual case descriptions
• Who was studied: Sample chest films of various stages of asbestosis, reviewed by eight physicians on an Air Hygiene Committee set up by the medical and industrial hygiene advisers of Asbestos Textile Institute members; some films came from a textile mill in North Carolina for which the author was consultant. The article also describes individual cases: a railroad shop repairman aged 57 and a foundry worker.
• Exposure: Asbestos dust exposure in general. The cases described involved unpacking and repacking asbestos insulation around locomotive boilers in a railroad shop, and earlier sawing of asbestos pipe coverings as a plumber's helper. No fiber type is named.
• Main results:
  • The author stated that poor film technique is the first and commonest cause of misdiagnosis of asbestosis.
  • When the eight committee physicians reviewed the films, there was fairly good agreement on the more advanced stages of asbestosis but practically none on the borderline degrees.
  • Some films the author had classified as early or first-stage asbestosis were called essentially negative by other experienced physicians, and the reverse also occurred.
  • The committee's final conclusion was that a first-stage case of asbestosis cannot be clearly defined.
  • The committee agreed that persons under 40 with a clear-cut diagnosis (beyond first stage) should be moved to a nondusty job if possible, and that less dust exposure is indicated where progression is seen on serial films, regardless of age.
  • In the author's experience, disability caused by doctors telling workers they had asbestosis was commoner in some areas than disability from the disease itself.
  • A railroad shop repairman aged 57, diagnosed with asbestosis by his physician, was found at postmortem to have a widespread congenital cystic lung with interstitial fibrosis due to long-standing infection, with nothing resembling asbestosis bodies, no pleural thickening and no hyaline fibrosis.
  • A foundry worker had a chest film characteristic of moderately well-developed asbestosis, but no asbestos exposure in his shop. A more detailed history showed he had sawed asbestos pipe coverings as a plumber's helper in his late teens and early twenties.
• The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that, as with all chronic chest diseases, all possible causes of what the chest film shows must be considered, because poorly studied cases lead to misdiagnoses that may cause irreversible harm to the patient.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Occupational Lung Disease, Chest X-Ray, Misdiagnosis, Autopsy, Fibrosis, Standing.

Browse return to medical research.