No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Benign cystic mesothelioma: a diagnostic dilemma

Our plain-English summary of Benign cystic mesothelioma: a diagnostic dilemma, by T.S. Usha Kiran, A. Agboola, R. Davies, et al (The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2002).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: T.S. Usha Kiran, A. Agboola, R. Davies, T.V. Stout
  • Journal: The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • Published: 2002;42(5):552-4
  • Type of article: Case report
  • Cited by: 3 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher

In plain English

This article was a case report combined with a review of published cases of benign cystic (multicystic) mesothelioma, a growth of the lining of the pelvis and abdomen. The authors worked at a hospital in Mid Glamorgan, United Kingdom. The patient was a 53-year-old woman with a five-year history of recurring pain and heaviness in the perineum. She gave no history of asbestos exposure. Ultrasound showed a 10.9 x 7.1 x 8.4 cm mass that closely resembled a hydatidiform mole. At surgery the mass arose from the right broad ligament, and similar fluid-filled vesicles covered the omentum and peritoneum. Most of the mass was removed. Microscopy showed a benign multicystic mesothelioma with no atypia or mitotic figures. A later MRI showed minimal residual disease, and a repeat scan one year later showed no progression. In the published cases the authors reviewed, prior surgery was documented in 28% (22/79), and they noted a recurrence rate of 33%. The authors concluded that this tumour should be suspected in people with long-standing vague symptoms, especially Caucasian women of reproductive age.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Case report with a review of the literature
  • Who was studied: One 53-year-old nulliparous, postmenopausal woman seen in the gynaecology department of Caerphilly District Miner's Hospital, Mid Glamorgan, United Kingdom, plus previously published cases reviewed by the authors
  • Exposure: No asbestos exposure was reported for the patient. The article did not study asbestos exposure.
  • Main results:
    • Patient: transvaginal ultrasound showed a mass with ill-defined margins measuring 10.9 x 7.1 x 8.4 cm, resembling the snowstorm appearance of a hydatidiform mole
    • Patient: tumour markers for ovarian neoplasm were not raised and beta-HCG was negative
    • Patient: at laparotomy the mass arose from the posterior surface of the right broad ligament, and the omentum and parietal peritoneum were studded with similar vesicles
    • Patient: the bulk of the mass was excised and a partial omentectomy was performed
    • Patient: histology showed a benign multicystic mesothelioma, with vesicles lined by flattened mesothelial cells showing no atypia or mitotic figures
    • Patient: minimal residual disease was seen on a later MRI, with no progression on a repeat MRI one year later
    • Reviewed published cases: a history of prior surgery was documented in 28% (22/79)
    • Reviewed published cases: a recurrence rate of 33%
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that multicystic mesothelioma should be suspected in patients with chronic vague symptoms of discomfort, pain or abdominal mass, especially Caucasian females of reproductive age. They added that ultrasound and laparoscopy with fine needle aspiration biopsy can help obtain a diagnosis before treatment.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • In the reviewed cases, information on race, parity and endometriosis was not available for all cases

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma.

Browse return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

T.S. Usha Kiran, A. Agboola, R. Davies, T.V. Stout. Benign cystic mesothelioma: a diagnostic dilemma. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2002;42(5):552-4. doi:10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.548_4.x. PMID: 12495110.

Cite our summary

“Benign cystic mesothelioma: a diagnostic dilemma.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/benign-cystic-mesothelioma-a-diagnostic-dilemma.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.