No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Benign mesotheliomas of testicular appendages: a morphologic and histochemical study of seven cases and review of theories of histogenesis

Our plain-English summary of Benign mesotheliomas of testicular appendages: a morphologic and histochemical study of seven cases and review of theories of histogenesis, by A. Stavrides, J.B. Hutcheson (The Journal of Urology, 1960).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: A. Stavrides, J.B. Hutcheson
  • Journal: The Journal of Urology
  • Published: 1960;83:448-53
  • Type of article: Case report
  • Cited by: 30 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher

In plain English

This 1960 article, from the Department of Surgical Pathology at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, described seven men with small benign tumors next to the testicle. The authors called these benign mesotheliomas; they are also known as so-called adenomatoid tumors. The article concerns benign tumors and does not mention asbestos or any work exposure. The men were white and aged 33 to 54. Five had a lump in the scrotum with no other symptoms. One had a painless swelling that later became painful for a few days. In one, the tumor was found during hernia surgery. The tumors measured 0.5 to 3.5 cm across, none of the men had a hydrocele, and only one gave a history of local injury. With special stains, the fluid-filled spaces inside the tumor cells did not stain for mucin or glycogen, and the authors reported material they identified as hyaluronic acid. The authors concluded that the tumors most likely arise from leftover mesothelial cells of the urogenital region, and they recommended adequate local removal of the tumor.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Case series of seven patients, with tissue staining (histochemical) studies and a discussion of theories about where these tumors come from
  • Who was studied: Seven white men aged 33 to 54 with benign tumors of the testicular appendages, diagnosed at Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. The dated cases were admitted between 1941 and 1958.
  • Exposure: Not reported. The article does not mention asbestos or any occupational or environmental exposure.
  • Main results:
    • Of the 7 cases, five had a palpable scrotal mass without other symptoms. One had a painless swelling present about a year that later caused a few days of pain. In one, the tumor was found incidentally during inguinal hernia repair.
    • Across the 7 cases, tumor size ranged from 0.5 to 3.5 cm in diameter.
    • None of the 7 cases had a hydrocele, and a history of local trauma was obtained from only 1 case.
    • Tumor location: 4 cases in the epididymis (two in the tail, one in the head, one not specified), 1 attached to the tunica vaginalis, 1 at the junction of the epididymis and vas deferens, and 1 at the junction of the upper pole of the testicle and the head of the epididymis.
    • The vacuoles in the tumor cells did not stain positively for mucin or glycogen.
    • Brush borders could not be shown in the cells lining the cystic spaces.
    • After testing with the enzyme hyaluronidase, the authors reported that the stained (metachromatic) material in the vacuoles and stroma was hyaluronic acid. The sentence giving the exact test result is partly lost in the scan.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors considered a mesothelial origin the most acceptable theory. They thought the tumors arise from rests of mesothelial cells of the urogenital region, and that their hyaluronic acid finding added evidence for this. They advocated a conservative approach and adequate local excision.

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma.

Browse more research in The Journal of Urology, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

A. Stavrides, J.B. Hutcheson. Benign mesotheliomas of testicular appendages: a morphologic and histochemical study of seven cases and review of theories of histogenesis. The Journal of Urology 1960;83:448-53. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)65736-7. PMID: 13833927.

Cite our summary

“Benign mesotheliomas of testicular appendages: a morphologic and histochemical study of seven cases and review of theories of histogenesis.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/benign-mesotheliomas-of-testicular-appendages-a-morphologic-and.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.