Categorical systems for reporting of cytology specimens: Following the footsteps of Bethesda-like reporting systems

Our plain-English summary of Categorical systems for reporting of cytology specimens: Following the footsteps of Bethesda-like reporting systems, by L.J. Layfield, Z. Baloch (Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2020).

The study

• Authors: L.J. Layfield, Z. Baloch
• Journal: Diagnostic Cytopathology
• Published: 2020;48(10):859-861
• Type of article: Editorial
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher

In plain English

This article was an editorial, not a research study. Its two authors, editors of a special issue of Diagnostic Cytopathology, introduced seven review articles on standardized, tiered systems for reporting cytology (cell-sample) results, modeled on the Bethesda system for cervical cytology. The reviews covered thyroid, mesothelioma, pancreaticobiliary, breast, respiratory, urinary and salivary gland cytology. One of them, a literature review of the Milan salivary gland system, analyzed 37 papers. The special issue also included an article on a training curriculum. The editorial reported no asbestos data and did not mention asbestos. Its mesothelioma section summarized a review by Sheaff of guidelines for the cytologic diagnosis of epithelioid and mixed-type malignant mesotheliomas. According to the editorial, that review discussed resistance among many mesothelioma experts to using cytology. It noted that developments in immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology had changed the validity of using cytology for primary diagnosis. It also identified a need to update recommendations on ancillary testing. As the editorial reported it, that review concluded that cytology is a valuable technique when used with appropriate clinical and imaging features and appropriate ancillary testing. The authors wrote that such reporting schemes are not set in stone and are updated periodically.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: editorial introducing a special issue of review articles on standardized cytology reporting systems; no original data
• Main results:
  • The editorial reported that Sheaff's review of the mesothelioma cytology guidelines discussed resistance among many mesothelioma experts to using cytology for specimens clinically suspicious for mesothelioma.
  • The editorial reported that Sheaff's review noted that developments in immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology have changed the validity of using cytology in the primary diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.
  • The editorial reported that Sheaff's review identified weaknesses in the mesothelioma guidelines, including a need to update and clarify recommendations on ancillary testing.
  • The editorial reported that the review of the Milan System for salivary gland cytology analyzed 37 papers.
• The authors' conclusion: The authors described standardized reporting schemes as expert recommendations that are not fixed and are updated periodically as new information on their use becomes known. They reported that Sheaff's review concluded that cytology, used with appropriate clinical and imaging features and appropriate ancillary testing, is a valuable technique for diagnosing malignant mesothelioma.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Cytology.

Related studies

• External quality assurance in nongynecologic cytology: The Australasian experience — P.W. Shield, F. Frost, et al. (2017)
• The value of cytology in distinguishing malignant mesothelioma: An institutional experience of 210 cases reclassified according to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) — P. Straccia, D. Magnini, et al. (2022)
• Detection of malignant mesothelioma using nuclear structure of mesothelial cells in effusion cytology specimens — A.B. Tosun, O. Yergiyev, et al. (2015)
• The utility of ancillary techniques in effusion cytology — K.V. Nance, J.F. Silverman (1992)
• Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology — D.T. Arnold, D. De Fonseka, et al. (2018)
• The marriage of cytology and cytogenetics — P. Dal Cin, X. Qian, et al. (2013)

Browse more research in Diagnostic Cytopathology, or return to medical research.