Our plain-English summary of Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), by K. Yoneda, F. Tanaka, N. Kondo, et al (Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: K. Yoneda, F. Tanaka, N. Kondo, M. Hashimoto, T. Takuwa, S. Matsumoto, Y. Okumura, N. Tsubota, A. Sato, T. Tsujimura, K. Kuribayashi, K. Fukuoka, C. Tabata, T. Nakano, S. Hasegawa
- Journal: Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Published: 2014;21 Suppl 4:S472-80
- Cited by: 16 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), a potential surrogate of micrometastasis, in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).
Methods: We prospectively evaluated CTCs in 7.5 mL of peripheral blood sampled from patients with a suspicion of MPM. A semiautomated system was used to capture CTCs with an antibody against the epithelial cell adhesion molecule.
Results: Of 136 eligible patients, 32 were finally diagnosed with nonmalignant diseases (NM), and 104 had MPM. CTCs were detected in 32.7 % (34 of 104) of MPM patients but in only 9.4 % (3 of 32) of NM patients (P = 0.011). The CTC count was significantly higher in MPM patients than in NM patients (P = 0.007), and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an insufficient capability of the CTC test in discrimination between MPM and NM, with an area under ROC curve of 0.623 (95 % confidence interval, 0.523-0.723; P = 0.036). Among MPM patients, CTCs were more frequently detected in patients with epithelioid subtype (39.7 %, 31 of 78) than in those with nonepithelioid subtypes (11.5 %, 3 of 26; P = 0.016). Positive CTCs (CTC count ≥ 1) were a significant factor to predict a poor prognosis among epithelioid patients (median overall survival, 22.3 months for positive CTCs vs. 12.6 months for negative CTCs; P = 0.004) and not in nonepithelioid patients (P = 0.649). A multivariate analysis showed that positive CTCs were a significant and independent factor to predict a poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 2.904; 95 % confidence interval, 1.530-5.511; P = 0.001) for epithelioid MPM patients.
Conclusions: CTC was a promising marker in diagnosis and prediction of prognosis in MPM, especially in epithelioid MPM.
In plain English
This prospective Japanese study tested whether blood tumor-cell counts could help diagnose malignant pleural mesothelioma and predict survival. From September 2007 to July 2010, 139 consecutive patients with suspected disease gave blood samples; most had a history of asbestos exposure. Of 136 eligible patients, 104 had mesothelioma and 32 nonmalignant pleural disease. Tumor cells were found in 34 of 104 mesothelioma patients (32.7%) and 3 of 32 others (9.4%). Counting one or more cells as positive, sensitivity was 32.7% and specificity 90.6%; the authors called discrimination insufficient (area under the curve 0.623, 95% confidence interval 0.523 to 0.723). In all mesothelioma patients, the unadjusted survival difference was not statistically significant, but adjusted analysis linked a positive test to poorer survival (hazard ratio 2.343, 95% confidence interval 1.362 to 4.030). In epithelioid-subtype patients, median survival was 22.3 months without detected cells and 12.6 months with them. Here a positive test independently predicted poorer survival (hazard ratio 2.904, 95% confidence interval 1.530 to 5.511). The authors concluded the test was promising, especially in epithelioid mesothelioma, and that validation studies are needed.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Prospective single-hospital study of the diagnostic and prognostic value of a blood test for circulating tumor cells (CellSearch system, which captures cells carrying the EpCAM marker)
- Who was studied: 139 consecutive patients with suspected malignant pleural mesothelioma who were referred for pleural biopsy at Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Japan, from September 2007 to July 2010. 3 patients were excluded because they had lung adenocarcinoma. Of the 136 eligible patients, 104 had mesothelioma and 32 had nonmalignant pleural disease.
- Exposure: The factor studied was the circulating tumor cell count in 7.5 mL of blood. Asbestos exposure history was recorded: 97 of 104 mesothelioma patients (93.3%) and 28 of 32 nonmalignant patients (87.5%) had a history of exposure. No fiber types were reported.
- Main results:
- Circulating tumor cells were detected in 34 of 104 mesothelioma patients (32.7%) and in 3 of 32 nonmalignant-disease patients (9.4%). Each of those 3 had a count of 1.
- In distinguishing mesothelioma from nonmalignant disease, the area under the ROC curve was 0.623 (95% confidence interval 0.523 to 0.723; P = 0.036). With a cut-off of 1 or more cells, sensitivity was 32.7% and specificity 90.6%.
- At a cut-off of 1 cell, the positive predictive value was 91.9% and the negative predictive value was 29.3%. At a cut-off of 2, specificity was 100% but sensitivity fell to 13.5%.
- Among mesothelioma patients, tumor cells were detected in 31 of 78 (39.7%) with the epithelioid subtype and in 3 of 26 (11.5%) with nonepithelioid subtypes (P = 0.016).
- Even in stage IV mesothelioma, tumor cells were detected in only 19 of 50 patients (38%): 18 of 37 epithelioid cases and 1 of 13 nonepithelioid cases.
- Across all mesothelioma patients, in the unadjusted comparison, median overall survival was 12.7 months for the CTC-negative group and 7.6 months for the CTC-positive group. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.160).
- In a multivariate analysis of all mesothelioma patients (all histologic types), the hazard ratio for a positive test was 2.343 (95% confidence interval 1.362 to 4.030; P = 0.002).
- In epithelioid mesothelioma patients, survival was 22.3 months for the CTC-negative group (n = 47) and 12.6 months for the CTC-positive group (n = 31) (P = 0.004, log-rank).
- In a multivariate analysis of epithelioid patients, a positive test was an independent predictor of poorer survival (hazard ratio 2.904; 95% confidence interval 1.530 to 5.511; P = 0.001).
- In nonepithelioid patients, the test was not a significant predictor of survival: 5.1 months for the CTC-negative group (n = 23) and 5.0 months for the CTC-positive group (n = 3) (P = 0.649).
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the circulating tumor cell test was a promising marker for diagnosing mesothelioma and predicting prognosis, especially in epithelioid mesothelioma, and that future validation studies should be done.
- Limitations the authors state:
- The test had low sensitivity (32.7%) and low negative predictive power (29.3%).
- The system captures cells that carry EpCAM, which mesothelioma cells may not carry. This could explain the low detection rate, especially in nonepithelioid subtypes.
- The authors described the test's ability to discriminate mesothelioma from nonmalignant disease as insufficient.
- The reason for the 3 positive results in nonmalignant patients is unclear. One of these patients developed mesothelioma 2 years after the initial biopsy.
- Future validation studies are needed to establish the test's prognostic performance.
Topics
The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pleural Mesothelioma, confidence interval, Epithelioid, Prognosis, Median Overall Survival, Multivariate Analysis, Hazard Ratio.
Related studies
- Circulating endothelial cell (CEC) as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) — K. Yoneda, F. Tanaka, et al. (2012)
- Detection of circulating tumor cells with a novel microfluidic system in malignant pleural mesothelioma — K. Yoneda, T. Kuwata, et al. (2019)
- EpCAM-independent capture of circulating tumor cells with a 'universal CTC-chip' — Y. Chikaishi, K. Yoneda, et al. (2017)
- Detection of circulating tumour cells in peripheral blood of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma — J. Raphael, C. Massard, et al. (2015)
- A liquid biopsy for detecting circulating mesothelial precursor cells: A new biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in mesothelioma — B.T.V. Duong, L. Wu, et al. (2020)
- Practical approaches to diagnose and treat for T0 malignant pleural mesothelioma: a proposal for diagnostic total parietal pleurectomy — S. Hasegawa, N. Kondo, et al. (2012)
Browse more research in Annals of Surgical Oncology, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
K. Yoneda, F. Tanaka, N. Kondo, M. Hashimoto, T. Takuwa, S. Matsumoto, et al. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Annals of Surgical Oncology 2014;21 Suppl 4:S472-80. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3399-2. PMID: 24306661.
Cite our summary
“Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/circulating-tumor-cells-ctcs-in-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-mpm.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.