No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Commentary: Go small or go home

Our plain-English summary of Commentary: Go small or go home, by A.W. Kim, U. Ahmad (The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2020).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This article is a short commentary by two thoracic surgeons, not an original study. It discussed a separate mouse study by Chu and colleagues, published in the same journal. That study tested the chemotherapy drug paclitaxel, carried in pH-responsive expansile nanoparticles, against malignant pleural mesothelioma. Mesothelioma cell lines were injected into the pleural space of mice. According to the commentary, overall survival doubled in that study's early-stage model. In its late-stage model, which used surgery as part of treatment, median overall survival in mice given the nanoparticle therapy followed by surgery was 126% greater than in mice given chemotherapy alone. The commentators noted that median survival for patients with this disease who had trimodality therapy has ranged from 15 to 18 months in other studies. They calculated that a 126% improvement would mean 34 to 41 months, but only if the mouse effect were repeated in humans. The authors described the Chu work as pioneering and foundational. The commentary did not discuss asbestos.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Commentary (invited editorial opinion) on a separate mouse experiment by Chu and colleagues; the commentators report no data of their own
  • Who was studied: No population of the commentators' own. The study discussed (Chu and colleagues) used a mouse model in which mesothelioma cell lines were injected into the pleural space, with early-stage and late-stage models. Numbers of mice are not given in the commentary.
  • Exposure: Not an asbestos exposure. The treatment studied by Chu and colleagues was paclitaxel-loaded pH-responsive expansile nanoparticles, combined with surgery in the late-stage model and compared with chemotherapy alone.
  • Main results:
    • As described by the commentators: in the early-stage mouse model of Chu and colleagues, the nanoparticle therapy doubled overall survival
    • As described by the commentators: in the late-stage mouse model, median overall survival of mice given the nanoparticle therapy followed by surgery was 126% greater than that of mice given chemotherapy alone
    • The commentators' own hypothetical calculation: median survival for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma having trimodality therapy has ranged from 15 to 18 months in other published studies, and a 126% improvement would correspond to 34 to 41 months
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors described the nanoparticle work of Chu and colleagues as pioneering and foundational. They said they looked forward to further data on how it might combine with immunotherapy.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The commentators framed any benefit to people as conditional, because the findings were observed in mice and had not been shown in humans

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.

Browse more research in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

A.W. Kim, U. Ahmad. Commentary: Go small or go home. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2020;160(3):e173-e174. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.036. PMID: 32143879.

Cite our summary

“Commentary: Go small or go home.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/commentary-go-small-or-go-home.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.