No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Commentary: To scan or not to scan: No longer the question for mesothelioma patients after pleurectomy

Our plain-English summary of Commentary: To scan or not to scan: No longer the question for mesothelioma patients after pleurectomy, by E.A. David, S.M. Atay (The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2020).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This is a commentary, not a new study. The authors, thoracic surgeons at the University of Southern California, discussed a study by De Leon and colleagues at Brigham and Women's Hospital on blood clots in the deep veins (deep venous thrombosis, or DVT) after pleurectomy/decortication, an operation for mesothelioma. As the commentators described it, that study included 93 patients in a surveillance program. Patients without symptoms had ultrasound scans of the arms and legs every 7 days. DVT was found in 27 (29%) patients, and 9 of those 27 (33%) had no symptoms. A standard risk score (the Caprini score) had estimated the risk at 10.7%. Median charges for the scans were estimated at $2103 per patient. All patients with clots in the arms had a central venous line in place. The commentators noted that the study did not address hospital labor and workflow, and that it was not powered to analyze the central-line group. The authors concluded that routine noninvasive DVT screening should be performed in these patients.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Commentary on another published study (De Leon and colleagues); it reports no new data of its own
  • Who was studied: No population of its own. The commented study, as described here, was a series of 93 patients with mesothelioma treated with pleurectomy/decortication at Brigham and Women's Hospital who took part in a DVT surveillance program
  • Exposure: No asbestos exposure is discussed. The subject is pleurectomy/decortication surgery for mesothelioma, followed by ultrasound (duplex) screening of the arms and legs for DVT every 7 days in patients without symptoms
  • Main results:
    • As reported by the commentators for the De Leon study: DVT was found in 27 of 93 patients (29%), of whom 9 (33%) had no symptoms
    • For the same patients, the Caprini scoring system had estimated a postoperative DVT risk of 10.7%
    • The De Leon authors estimated median charges for upper- and lower-extremity ultrasound screening at $2103 per patient
    • In the Brigham series, all patients with upper-extremity DVT had a central venous line in place
  • The authors' conclusion: The commentators concluded that routine noninvasive screening for DVT should be performed in patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication for mesothelioma
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The commentators noted that the De Leon study did not address hospital labor and workflow
    • The commentators noted that the series was not powered for subset analysis of the patients with central lines

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Lung cancer, Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma.

Browse more research in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

E.A. David, S.M. Atay. Commentary: To scan or not to scan: No longer the question for mesothelioma patients after pleurectomy. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2020;160(4):1076-1077. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.094. PMID: 32057452.

Cite our summary

“Commentary: To scan or not to scan: No longer the question for mesothelioma patients after pleurectomy.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/commentary-to-scan-or-not-to-scan-no-longer-the-question-for.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.