Our plain-English summary of Congress considers asbestos indemnity bill, by R.J. Smith (Science, 1979).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
In plain English
This is a short news item in the 'Briefing' section of Science. It is not a research study and contains no medical data. The author reported on two asbestos bills before the U.S. Congress in 1979. The first, drafted by the Johns-Manville Corporation and introduced by Representative Millicent Fenwick, would require the federal government to pay the product liability claims of any U.S. citizen exposed to asbestos before December 1980. The article said lawsuits against Johns-Manville were estimated at $1.5 to $1.7 billion. It also said the federal government had agreed to pay $5.7 million as its share of a $20 million suit by Texas insulation plant workers against Pittsburgh Corning. The second bill would have the federal government pay the interest on school loans for removing asbestos, up to a total cost of $100 million. A House committee rejected, 18 to 11, a proposal to assess the industry up to $30 million. Several congressmen said the industry could escape responsibility if the bills were enacted.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: news briefing (journalism, not a research study)
- Who was studied: Not a study population. The item concerned two asbestos bills pending before the U.S. Congress in 1979.
- Exposure: Asbestos dust, described as a known carcinogen, in the context of product liability claims, workmen's compensation and removal of asbestos from schools
- Main results:
- The first bill, drafted by Johns-Manville, would require the federal government to pay the product liability claims of any U.S. citizen exposed to asbestos before December 1980.
- Lawsuits against Johns-Manville from workers exposed to asbestos dust were estimated to total between $1.5 and $1.7 billion.
- The first bill would also require the asbestos and tobacco industries to set up a fund for future claims. The article said the number of claimants could be several million.
- The federal government had agreed to pay $5.7 million as its share of liability in a $20 million suit against Pittsburgh Corning by workers in a Texas insulation plant.
- According to meeting minutes cited in the article, in 1978 the international Asbestos Information Association declined to recommend a warning label on asbestos going to some countries.
- For the second bill, on federal payment of interest on school asbestos-removal loans up to a total cost of $100 million, the House Education and Labor Committee rejected by 18 to 11 a proposal to assess the industry up to $30 million.
- The authors' conclusion: The item draws no scientific conclusion. It reported congressional sources as saying the second (schools) bill had an excellent chance of passage.
Related studies
- The role of surgical cytoreduction in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: meeting summary of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group Congress, September 11-14, 2012, Boston, Mass — V. Rusch, E.H. Baldini, et al. (2013)
- Tumors that mimic asbestos-related mesothelioma: time to consider a genetics-based tumor registry? — B.D. Kerger, R.C. James, et al. (2014)
- Spontaneous pneumothorax and lung carcinoma: should one consider synchronous malignant pleural mesothelioma? — T.A. Flood, H.S. Sekhon, et al. (2009)
- Is it time to consider pleurectomy and decortication as the only surgical treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma? — M.J. Weyant (2012)
- Development of a fibre size-specific job-exposure matrix for airborne asbestos fibres — J.M. Dement, E.D. Kuempel, et al. (2008)
- Airborne fiber size characterization in exposure estimation: Evaluation of a modified transmission electron microcopy protocol for asbestos and potential use for carbon nanotubes and nanofibers — J.M. Dement, E.D. Kuempel, et al. (2015)
Browse more research in Science, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
R.J. Smith. Congress considers asbestos indemnity bill. Science 1979;204(4394):712. doi:10.1126/science.204.4394.712. PMID: 17840217.
Cite our summary
“Congress considers asbestos indemnity bill.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/congress-considers-asbestos-indemnity-bill.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.