No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Early-onset, asbestos-associated mesothelioma?

Our plain-English summary of Early-onset, asbestos-associated mesothelioma?, by C.L. Berry, T.J. Jones (Lancet, 1986).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: C.L. Berry, T.J. Jones
  • Journal: Lancet
  • Published: 1986;1(8489):1094
  • Type of article: Letter
  • Cited by: 1 article, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher
  • In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 001192).

In plain English

This was a short letter to the editor, not a research study. The authors, from the Department of Morbid Anatomy at the London Hospital Medical College, were responding to an earlier report by Booth and Weaver of a mesothelioma in a young man, and to comments on that report by Elmes and Brown. The authors' department had handled the lung tumour from this case. They wrote that Booth and Weaver had referred to the department's histology report without consulting them. The authors agreed that the tissue looked like mesothelioma under the microscope. They examined multiple 30-micrometre sections of lung and lymph node tissue by light microscopy, and they also studied post-incineration preparations. They found a single fibre, possibly asbestos, in the lung tissue beneath the tumour. They described this as less than would normally be expected in any city-dweller. The authors concluded that there was no significant histological evidence of asbestos exposure in this case, and that the tumour should be regarded as spontaneously occurring. They noted that no necropsy (autopsy) was done. The letter concerns one patient and gives no rates.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Letter to the editor commenting on a previously reported single case (case report) of mesothelioma, with the authors' own tissue examination
  • Who was studied: One young man with mesothelioma, whose case was first reported by Booth and Weaver; his lung tumour was handled by the authors' department at the London Hospital Medical College
  • Exposure: Asbestos exposure, assessed by looking for fibres in lung and lymph node tissue with light microscopy and post-incineration preparations; no fiber type, job or product is given
  • Main results:
    • The tumour's appearance under the microscope was that of mesothelioma
    • A single fibre, possibly asbestos, was found in the lung tissue underlying the tumour. The authors said this was less than would normally be expected in any city-dweller.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that there was no significant histological evidence of asbestos exposure in this case, and that the tumour should be regarded as spontaneously occurring
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • No necropsy (autopsy) was done

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Lung cancer, Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma.

Browse more research in Lancet, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

C.L. Berry, T.J. Jones. Early-onset, asbestos-associated mesothelioma? Lancet 1986;1(8489):1094. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91355-3. PMID: 2871356.

Cite our summary

“Early-onset, asbestos-associated mesothelioma?” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/early-onset-asbestos-associated-mesothelioma.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.