No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Electron microscopy in the diagnosis of percutaneous fine needle aspiration specimens

Our plain-English summary of Electron microscopy in the diagnosis of percutaneous fine needle aspiration specimens, by E.J. Wills, S. Carr, J. Philips (Ultrastructural Pathology, 1987).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

Abstract

Five years experience in the application of electron microscopy to fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens is reviewed. In an initial evaluation, 200 consecutive unselected specimens were examined; 89 proved diagnostic and, in a third of these, electron microscopy gave additional information that was often essential to diagnosis. Negative specimens resulted almost entirely from failure to obtain an adequate amount of material. Results were improved by the adoption of a preparation technique involving concentration of the cells in bovine serum albumin and by the inspection of a rapidly stained smear at the time of the aspiration procedure, with a further needle pass for electron microscopy being performed if necessary. Despite the small size of specimens, adequate examination was usually possible and electron microscopy has proved of value in the diagnosis of tumor samples acquired by fine needle aspiration in the same way as has been established with the larger sized specimens obtained by conventional biopsy and surgical resection.

In plain English

This article reviewed five years of the authors' experience at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia, using electron microscopy on fine needle aspiration samples (cells drawn from lumps through a thin needle). It was not a study of asbestos. Of an initial 200 consecutive unselected specimens, mostly from the lung, 89 proved diagnostic. In 30 of these, electron microscopy added information beyond light microscopy. The 111 nondiagnostic specimens resulted almost entirely from failure to obtain enough material. More than 600 samples were examined in all, and the article described illustrative cases. One was a 68-year-old man with left pleural and mediastinal disease who smoked 20 to 30 cigarettes a day and reported past occupational exposure to asbestos. His needle sample was consistent with mesothelioma, and electron microscopy substantiated that diagnosis. The authors concluded that electron microscopy yielded information important to treatment in up to a third of aspirates. They noted that the large nondiagnostic share reflected unselected specimens and the use of only the material left over after cytology.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Single-center review of five years of experience (case series), with an initial evaluation of consecutive unselected specimens followed by selective use, and illustrative case histories
  • Who was studied: Initially 200 consecutive percutaneous fine needle aspiration specimens from deep sites (119 from lung, 33 from bone, the rest from other sites); more than 600 samples examined to date; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown NSW, Australia; work begun towards the end of 1980
  • Exposure: Not an asbestos exposure study. The exposure studied was the use of electron microscopy on needle aspirates. One illustrative mesothelioma patient had a history of past occupational exposure to asbestos; no fiber type, job or dose was given.
  • Main results:
    • Of the initial 200 unselected specimens, 89 proved diagnostic; in a third of these, electron microscopy gave additional information
    • In 30 of the 89 diagnostic specimens, electron microscopy gave additional information (Table 2); 111 specimens were nondiagnostic
    • Nondiagnostic specimens resulted almost entirely from failure to obtain enough material
    • At the time of writing, about one third of specimens received contained no tumor or were otherwise inadequate
    • Switching from the agar method to the bovine serum albumin concentration method reduced the number of samples reported as blood only
    • Mesothelioma case (68-year-old man with extensive anterior mediastinal and left pleural disease and past occupational asbestos exposure): a pleural core biopsy suggested mesothelioma but could not exclude squamous carcinoma; needle aspiration cytology was consistent with mesothelioma and electron microscopy substantiated the diagnosis
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that electron microscopy yields additional information important to patient therapy in up to a third of aspirates examined, and that it is of value in diagnosing tumor samples obtained by fine needle aspiration, as it is with larger biopsy and surgical specimens
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The nondiagnostic proportion of the first 200 specimens was large; the authors attributed this to the specimens being unselected
    • Only the material remaining after cytology needs had been met was used for electron microscopy in the initial series
    • Sampling error is a greater concern with aspirates than with conventional specimens
    • The bovine serum albumin method added roughly another working day of preparation time
    • Case series from a single center tend to reflect that institution's specialist interests

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Biopsy, Surgical Resection.

Browse more research in Ultrastructural Pathology, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

E.J. Wills, S. Carr, J. Philips. Electron microscopy in the diagnosis of percutaneous fine needle aspiration specimens. Ultrastructural Pathology 1987;11(4):361-87. doi:10.3109/01913128709048431. PMID: 3039704.

Cite our summary

“Electron microscopy in the diagnosis of percutaneous fine needle aspiration specimens.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/electron-microscopy-in-the-diagnosis-of-percutaneous-fine-needle.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.