Our plain-English summary of Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Pleurectomy Decortication: Can We Really Compare Their Survival?, by P. Bertoglio, S. Korasidis (The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2015).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: P. Bertoglio, S. Korasidis
- Journal: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Published: 2015;100(4):1508-9
- Type of article: Letter, Comment
- Cited by: 2 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
In plain English
This item is a short letter to the editor, not a research study, and it reports no new data. The authors responded to a meta-analysis by Taioli and coworkers that compared survival after two operations for malignant pleural mesothelioma: extrapleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy decortication. The authors wrote that the best treatment for this cancer has not yet been found. They said surgery cannot be used alone, even in early-stage disease, and must be combined with other therapies before and after the operation. They argued that surgeons choose the operation case by case according to tumor stage and histology, so patient groups differ greatly and survival can hardly be compared. Citing other authors, they said the two operations have different indications and should not be considered alternatives. They also called pleurectomy decortication a 'Pandora's box' covering many lung-sparing techniques that vary by surgeon. The authors ended by asking whether comparing long-term survival in such a varied population treated with multimodal therapies is really possible and meaningful. The letter does not discuss asbestos exposure.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Letter to the editor commenting on a published meta-analysis; no original data
- Who was studied: No patients were studied. The letter discusses the meta-analysis by Taioli and coworkers of surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
- Exposure: Not applicable. The letter does not discuss asbestos or any other exposure. Its subject is two operations for malignant pleural mesothelioma: extrapleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy decortication.
- Main results:
- The authors' view (no data given): the best treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma leading to satisfactory long-term results has not been found.
- The authors' view: surgery cannot be considered alone, even in early-stage disease, and must be combined with other therapies before (neoadjuvant) and after (adjuvant) surgery.
- The authors' argument: because the operation is chosen according to tumor stage and histology, patient groups differ greatly and survival and postoperative courses can hardly be compared.
- Citing Wolf and colleagues, the authors stated that the two operations have different indications and should not be considered alternative treatments.
- The authors' argument: the definition of pleurectomy decortication covers a wide range of lung-sparing approaches that vary with the surgeon's technique.
- The authors' conclusion: The authors questioned whether comparing long-term survival in such a varied population of patients treated with multimodal therapies is really possible and meaningful.
Topics
The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP).
Related studies
- Meta-analysis of survival after pleurectomy decortication versus extrapleural pneumonectomy in mesothelioma — E. Taioli, A.S. Wolf, et al. (2015)
- Extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma — S. Hasegawa (2014)
- Extrapleural Pneumonectomy Versus Pleurectomy/Decortication for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma — N. Zhou, D.C. Rice, et al. (2022)
- Current Treatment of Mesothelioma: Extrapleural Pneumonectomy Versus Pleurectomy/Decortication — A.S. Wolf, R.M. Flores (2016)
- Short-term outcomes of pleurectomy decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy in mesothelioma — M. van Gerwen, A. Wolf, et al. (2018)
- Pleurectomy/decortication is superior to extrapleural pneumonectomy in the multimodality management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma — L. Lang-Lazdunski, A. Bille, et al. (2012)
Browse more research in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
P. Bertoglio, S. Korasidis. Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Pleurectomy Decortication: Can We Really Compare Their Survival? The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2015;100(4):1508-9. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.01.053. PMID: 26434466.
Cite our summary
“Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Pleurectomy Decortication: Can We Really Compare Their Survival?” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/extrapleural-pneumonectomy-and-pleurectomy-decortication-can-we.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.