Fenten chemistry of Fe(III)-exchanged zeolitic minerals treated with antioxidants

Our plain-English summary of Fenten chemistry of Fe(III)-exchanged zeolitic minerals treated with antioxidants, by T.A. Ruda, P.K. Dutta (Environmental Science & Technology, 2005).

The study

• Authors: T.A. Ruda, P.K. Dutta
• Journal: Environmental Science & Technology
• Published: 2005;39(16):6147-52
• Cited by: 12 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher

Abstract

Respirable mineral fibers, such as asbestos, are known to cause pleural mesothelioma, pulmonary fibrosis, and bronchial carcinoma, often years after exposure. Erionite and mordenite, two mineral aluminosilicates (zeolites) with different toxicities, can be used as models to help understand asbestos toxicity. Erionite is carcinogenic, while mordenite is relatively benign. No iron is typically present in erionite or mordenite, but because of their ion-exchange properties they can acquire iron after inhalation. The iron is typically in the Fe(III) form and will need to be reduced prior to any Fenton activity. Lung lining fluid contains antioxidants, such as glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid (AA), which can reduce Fe(III) to Fe(II). In this study, we have compared the Fenton reactivity of Fe(III)-exchanged erionite and mordenite after treatment with antioxidants. The Fenton assay involved the reaction of hydroxyl radicals with dimethyl sulfoxide. Fenton reactivity was most marked with AA followed by GSH, and hydrogen peroxide also exhibited minor reactivity. Erionite generated an order of magnitude greater hydroxyl radicals than mordenite, normalized to the surface iron content, providing support for the hypothesis that the iron coordination at the mineral surface plays a significant role in bioactivity.

In plain English

This was a laboratory chemistry study. No people, animals or cells were tested, and no asbestos was tested. The authors used two natural zeolite minerals as models for understanding asbestos toxicity: erionite, which they describe as carcinogenic, and mordenite, which they describe as relatively benign. They loaded ground samples of each mineral with iron in the Fe(III) form. They then treated the samples for 30 minutes with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) or glutathione at 200 µM, a level chosen to simulate lung lining fluid, or with no antioxidant. Finally, they measured the hydroxyl radicals produced after adding hydrogen peroxide. For both minerals, hydroxyl radical production was highest with ascorbic acid, then glutathione, then no antioxidant. Mordenite carried more surface iron than erionite. But for the same amount of surface iron, erionite was about an order of magnitude more reactive with every treatment. The authors concluded that erionite's higher reactivity must be related to its surface structure, which leads iron to bind differently. They noted that both mineral samples contained impurities and that the study focused on surface chemistry, not erionite's fibrous shape.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Laboratory (in vitro) chemistry experiment comparing iron-loaded mineral samples; no cells, animals or humans
• Who was studied: Ground samples (1 g) of two natural zeolite minerals, erionite and mordenite, obtained from Minerals Research, Clarkson, NY. The authors describe erionite as carcinogenic and mordenite as relatively benign. No asbestos was tested.
• Exposure: Erionite and mordenite loaded with iron in the Fe(III) form by ion-exchange, then treated with 200 µM ascorbic acid or glutathione (chosen to simulate the typical concentration in lung lining fluid) or with no antioxidant, followed by hydrogen peroxide and dimethyl sulfoxide to measure hydroxyl radical production
• Main results:
  • For both erionite and mordenite, hydroxyl radical production followed the order ascorbic acid, then glutathione, then no antioxidant (hydrogen peroxide only)
  • Normalized to surface iron, erionite was about an order of magnitude more Fenton reactive than mordenite for all reductants
  • Hydroxyl radical relative to surface iron (percent conversion of Fe(III), assuming 1:1 stoichiometry) ranged from about 1% for mordenite with no antioxidant to about 106% for erionite treated with ascorbic acid
  • Surface iron was measured at 1.8 × 10^1 µg per gram for mordenite and 8.8 × 10^-1 µg per gram for erionite
  • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed the iron (Fe 2p) peak at a higher binding energy on mordenite (711.5 eV) than on erionite (710.8 eV), which the authors interpreted as different iron coordination
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the higher Fenton reactivity of Fe(III)-erionite over Fe(III)-mordenite must be related to surface structure, which leads to different iron coordination states and therefore different redox properties
• Limitations the authors state:
  • Both natural mineral samples contained impurities (quartz and feldspar in mordenite, an aluminosilicate in erionite), though the authors argue these play a minor role
  • The study addressed surface chemistry only, not the fibrous nature of erionite, which the authors note is also relevant to biological activity
  • The mechanism of the Fenton reaction, including whether free hydroxyl radicals are generated, is controversial; the authors represent the active oxidants as hydroxyl radicals
  • A simple correlation between the X-ray photoelectron binding energy and how easily iron is reduced cannot be made

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mineral Fiber, Pleural Mesothelioma, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Carcinoma, erionite, Zeolite, Carcinogenic, Lung Lining Fluid.

Related studies

• Analysis of the biological and chemical reactivity of zeolite-based aluminosilicate fibers and particulates — E. Fach, W.J. Waldman, et al. (2002)
• Iron from a geochemical viewpoint. Understanding toxicity/pathogenicity mechanisms in iron-bearing minerals with a special attention to mineral fibers — A.F. Gualtieri, G.B. Andreozzi, et al. (2019)
• Stability of mineral fibres in contact with human cell cultures. An in situ μXANES, μXRD and XRF iron mapping study — S. Pollastri, A.F. Gualtieri, et al. (2016)
• The chemical environment of iron in mineral fibres. A combined X-ray absorption and Mössbauer spectroscopic study — S. Pollastri, F. D'Acapito, et al. (2015)
• Significance of mass and number of fibers in the correlation of V79 cytotoxicity with tumorigenic potential of mineral fibers — L.D. Palekar, B.M. Most, et al. (1988)
• Dusts causing pneumoconiosis generate .OH and produce hemolysis by acting as Fenton catalysts — T.P. Kennedy, R. Dodson, et al. (1989)

Browse more research in Environmental Science & Technology, or return to medical research.