No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Follow-up respiratory measurements in Quebec chrysotile asbestos miners and millers

Our plain-English summary of Follow-up respiratory measurements in Quebec chrysotile asbestos miners and millers, by M.R. Becklake, D. Thomas, F. Liddell, et al (Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1982).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: M.R. Becklake, D. Thomas, F. Liddell, J.C. McDonald
  • Journal: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
  • Published: 1982;8 Suppl 1:105-10
  • Cited by: 11 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed
  • In J-M's library: Johns-Manville's company medical library held a copy (J-M no. 000660).

Abstract

In 1974 changes in dyspnea, lung function, and pneumoconiotic radiographic abnormalities were recorded among the 1,015 Quebec chrysotile miners and millers surveyed in 1967-1968. The aim was to relate these changes to dust exposure--age, smoking, and earlier health status being taken into account. Dyspnea and lung function were assessed in 722 men, and for 277 recent radiographs were read separately by three experts for changes in the parenchyma and pleura. Each measure was analyzed independently for men without any abnormality when first seen (eligible for "attack") and for others (eligible for progression/regression). Age significantly influenced the rate of attack of pleural abnormality and the rates of attack and progression of dyspnea and lung function decline. Smoking had comparatively minor effects. The only associations with exposure were for progression of parenchymal change (one reader), and for progression of dyspnea. These essentially negative findings are similar to those obtained in a previous longitudinal survey of radiographs from the same workforce.

In plain English

This study followed up 1,015 male workers from the chrysotile asbestos mines and mills of Quebec who had first been examined in 1967–1968. They had been chosen by random sampling weighted toward older men. In 1974, 722 of them repeated a breathlessness questionnaire and lung function tests. For 277 of these men, pairs of chest X-rays were also read separately by three experienced readers. Each man's past dust exposure was estimated from his employment records up to October 1966. The authors looked at new abnormalities, and at worsening or improvement of existing ones, taking age and smoking into account. Age was significantly related to new and worsening breathlessness, to lung function changes, and to new pleural abnormality. Smoking had comparatively minor effects. Exposure was linked only to worsening breathlessness and, for one X-ray reader only, to worsening lung tissue (parenchymal) changes. The authors called these essentially negative findings, similar to an earlier X-ray study of the same workforce. They noted that the follow-up of under 8 years may have been too short, that exposure during follow-up was not counted, and that the exposure measure may be too crude.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Longitudinal follow-up (repeat survey) of a previously studied group of workers, comparing measurements from 1967–1968 with measurements in 1974
  • Who was studied: 1,015 male Quebec chrysotile asbestos miners and millers. They were selected by stratified random sampling, weighted toward older ages, from a register of about 6,000 current workers as of 31 October 1966, and were first surveyed in 1967–1968. At restudy in 1974, 91 had died and 105 were not reexamined. A further 97 were reexamined by questionnaire only, were mostly retired, and were excluded. Of the 722 men analysed, 445 had questionnaire and lung function tests only, and 277 also had usable pairs of chest radiographs.
  • Exposure: Chrysotile asbestos dust in mining and milling. A cumulative exposure index in million particles per cubic foot-years was calculated from each man's work history up to 31 October 1966 and was not updated. Men were divided into four exposure groups: under 10, 10 to 99, 100 to 199, and 200 or more mpcf-years.
  • Main results:
    • Among all 722 men, age was significantly related to new abnormalities (attack) and to progression/regression of breathlessness, forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximum midexpiratory flow (MMEF).
    • Age also significantly influenced the rate of new pleural abnormality on chest radiographs.
    • Smoking had comparatively minor effects. It was significant for new MMEF abnormality and for progression/regression of FVC abnormality.
    • After adjustment for age and smoking, the only associations with exposure were for progression of breathlessness (dyspnea) and for progression of parenchymal radiographic change, the latter by one of the three readers only. Crude (unadjusted) rates of new parenchymal and pleural abnormality and of parenchymal progression in the 277 men with radiographs had increased with exposure.
    • When change was related to average values, men in poorer average condition showed greater deterioration. When change was related to initial values instead, each positive relationship became significantly negative, which the authors said was predicted by regression to the mean.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that these essentially negative findings were similar to those of an earlier longitudinal radiograph survey of the same workforce. They suggested that, in the modern era, exposure as measured in this study may have become less important to outcome.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The follow-up period of less than 8 years may have been too short to detect effects beyond those attributable to ageing.
    • Exposure during the follow-up period was not taken into account, although the authors did not believe this alone explained the weak exposure-response findings.
    • The exposure measure may be too crude a reflection of how much dust is retained in the lung.
    • The analysis of how first-examination findings predicted later change was complicated by regression to the mean.
    • Effects attributed to age might instead reflect how long dust has resided in the lung.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Quebec Chrysotile, Dyspnea, Parenchyma, Pleura.

Browse more research in Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, or return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

M.R. Becklake, D. Thomas, F. Liddell, J.C. McDonald. Follow-up respiratory measurements in Quebec chrysotile asbestos miners and millers. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 1982;8 Suppl 1:105-10. PMID: 7100836.

Cite our summary

“Follow-up respiratory measurements in Quebec chrysotile asbestos miners and millers.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/follow-up-respiratory-measurements-in-quebec-chrysotile-asbestos.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.