Our plain-English summary of Giant cell formation after intraperitoneal application of crocidolite asbestos fibres in rats, by S. Sethi, E.G. Beck, N. Manojlovic (The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 1974).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: S. Sethi, E.G. Beck, N. Manojlovic
- Journal: The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
- Published: 1974;17(1):53-6
- Cited by: 3 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
In plain English
This animal experiment looked at how rat cells react to crocidolite asbestos fibres inside the abdomen. The authors implanted a pair of cover slips in the omentum (a fold of abdominal tissue) of female Wistar rats and added 5 mg of U.I.C.C. crocidolite. Control rats received quartz, corundum or saline instead. Rats were killed at 24-hour intervals up to the eighth day, and the cells on the cover slips were examined. In total, 336 rats were used. At 24 to 48 hours, scavenger cells (macrophages) contained many small crocidolite fibres. At the end of the fourth day these single-nucleus cells began to fuse, and within two hours many multinucleated giant cells appeared. On the fifth day some giant cells held small single cells inside them, which the authors took to be cells incorporated after the first fusion. By the eighth day some giant cells had as many as sixty nuclei. No giant cells were seen in the control groups. The authors concluded that the fibrous shape of the asbestos, not the uptake of solid material itself, was the stimulus for giant cell formation.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Animal experiment using a cover slip implanted in the rat peritoneal cavity, with control rats given quartz, corundum or physiological saline instead of asbestos
- Who was studied: Female Wistar rats (180-200 g). At each 24-hour interval up to day eight, four crocidolite-treated rats and one rat of each control type were killed. The experiment was repeated six times, giving groups of 24 experimental and 6 control animals, 336 rats in total. Laboratory in Düsseldorf, West Germany; dates not stated.
- Exposure: 5 mg U.I.C.C. crocidolite placed on a pair of cover slips implanted in the greater omentum
- Main results:
- In the crocidolite group, 24 to 48 hours after exposure, dendritic and epitheloid macrophages contained many small asbestos fibres, arranged mostly around the nucleus
- In the crocidolite group, fusion of single-nucleus cells into multinucleated cells began at the end of the fourth day, and many multinucleated cells appeared within two hours
- On the fifth day, some giant cells (polykaryocytes) in the crocidolite group contained small single-nucleus cells lying in a vacuole inside them, which the authors interpreted as cells incorporated after the primary fusion
- On the eighth day, giant cells in the crocidolite group sometimes had as many as sixty nuclei, with only occasional small asbestos fibres
- No giant cells (polykaryocytes) were seen in any control group up to the end of the experiment
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that in their experiments the stimulus for giant cell formation was the fibrous shape of the asbestos dust, not the engulfment of solid material
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Crocidolite.
Related studies
- Cytotoxicity and multinucleate giant cell formation in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast caused by crocidolite and chrysotile — Y.C. Hong, S.S. Choi (1997)
- Additional atypical malignant mesothelioma after intraperitoneal injection of mineral fibres in rats — K. Kamino, H. Ernst, et al. (1993)
- Experimentally induced mesothelioma in white rats in response to intraperitoneal administration of amorphous crocidolite asbestos: preliminary report — K. Kolev (1982)
- What's new in intraperitoneal test on Kevlar (asbestos substitute)? — O.A. Brinkmann, K.M. Müller (1989)
- P53 mutations in tumours induced by intraperitoneal injection of crocidolite asbestos and benzo[a]pyrene in rats — K. Unfried, N. Kociok, et al. (1997)
- Differential diagnosis of malignant tumours in the abdominal cavity of rats after intraperitoneal injection of crocidolite or benzo[a]pyrene — J. Friemann, M. Varnai, et al. (1996)
Browse more research in The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
S. Sethi, E.G. Beck, N. Manojlovic. Giant cell formation after intraperitoneal application of crocidolite asbestos fibres in rats. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 1974;17(1):53-6. doi:10.1093/annhyg/17.1.53. PMID: 4451315.
Cite our summary
“Giant cell formation after intraperitoneal application of crocidolite asbestos fibres in rats.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/giant-cell-formation-after-intraperitoneal-application-of-crocidolite.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.