No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Immunological reflections on asbestos

Our plain-English summary of Immunological reflections on asbestos, by R. Burrell (Environmental Health Perspectives, 1974).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This 1974 article was a commentary, not a report of a study carried out by the author. The author, a pulmonary immunologist, reflected on what was known about immune responses in asbestosis, comparing it with silicosis and coal workers' pneumonitis. The author called the immunologic evidence on asbestosis scanty and unimpressive. The author criticized animal experiments that used doses that were too high, used infected rats, or injected fibers into organs. The commentary described other researchers' work. Turner-Warwick (1970) reported fourfold increases in the prevalence of rheumatoid factor and antinuclear factor in asbestosis cases compared with a normal population. An unpublished English report found that mesothelioma tumor fluid harmed cultured mesothelioma cells but not other cell cultures. A personal communication from Turner-Warwick said that PHA stimulation, a test of T cell function, was impaired in 4 of 12 asbestosis patients. The author suggested that epidemiologic studies of asbestos workers include tests of T and B cell competence. The author also urged that experiments use pathogen-free animals and monitor animals and cell cultures for Mycoplasma infection.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Commentary (opinion piece discussing others' published, unpublished and personally communicated work; not a report of a study by the author)
  • Who was studied: No study population; the author discussed existing immunological evidence on asbestosis, compared with silicosis and coal workers' pneumonitis
  • Exposure: Asbestos fibers in general (no fiber type named), discussed as a possible antigen, antigen carrier or adjuvant
  • Main results:
    • The author's own assessment: compared with silicosis and coal workers' pneumonitis, the immunologic evidence on asbestosis was scanty and unimpressive, and much of the experimental work used doses that were too high
    • Cited work, not a study by this author: Turner-Warwick (1970) found fourfold increases in the prevalence of rheumatoid factor and antinuclear factor in asbestosis cases compared with a normal population
    • Cited personal communication, not a study by this author: Turner-Warwick found PHA stimulation (a T cell function test) impaired in 4 of 12 asbestosis patients
    • Cited unpublished report from England, not a study by this author: mesothelioma tumor fluid was cytotoxic for cultured mesothelioma cells but not for other cell cultures
  • The authors' conclusion: The author suggested that epidemiologic studies of asbestos workers include tests for both T and B cell competence. The author also urged that animal experiments use pathogen-free animals kept under quarantine and monitored for Mycoplasma, and that cell cultures also be monitored for Mycoplasma.

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis.

Browse more research in Environmental Health Perspectives, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

R. Burrell. Immunological reflections on asbestos. Environmental Health Perspectives 1974;9:297-8. doi:10.1289/ehp.749297. PMID: 4470946.

Cite our summary

“Immunological reflections on asbestos.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/immunological-reflections-on-asbestos.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.