No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Mesothelioma in a community in the north of England

Our plain-English summary of Mesothelioma in a community in the north of England, by M. Greenberg (Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1997).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This is a letter to the editor, not a research study. The author commented on a 1996 paper by Edwards and colleagues about mesothelioma in Calderdale, a community in the north of England, and the Acre Mill asbestos factory there. The author criticised that paper's presentation of historical facts and its analysis of data. The author noted that after Cape left, the factory was occupied by another manufacturer in a not entirely decontaminated state. The author argued that the paper's average incidence for Calderdale was diluted by the large non-exposed population. Taking the factory population on its own, the author calculated between 524 and 786 mesothelioma cases per million person-years, depending on the estimate of workforce size. The author pointed out that of 17 malignant mesothelioma cases in people described as not exposed to asbestos, eight had excessive amounts of amphibole in their lung tissue. The author also questioned reliance on lung fibre counts. In a printed reply, the original authors said a detailed analysis of tissue-proven mesotheliomas found no case of disease from factory pollution in anyone living within two to four square miles of the factory who had not worked at Acre Mill.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Letter to the editor (correspondence) commenting on a published article, followed by the original authors' reply
  • Who was studied: No new population was studied. The letter discusses the Edwards et al. study of mesothelioma in Calderdale, north of England, covering 1966-94, including people who worked at the Acre Mill asbestos factory (stated in that study as between 2000 and 3000 people)
  • Exposure: Asbestos exposure from the Acre Mill factory, which was commandeered in 1939 to produce gas mask filters; amphibole and chrysotile fibres are discussed
  • Main results:
    • The author argued that the original paper's average mesothelioma incidence for Calderdale was diluted by the overwhelming non-exposed population
    • The author calculated that, for the factory population studied separately, the rate was between 524 and 786 mesothelioma cases per million person-years, depending on which extreme estimate of factory population is used
    • The author noted that, of the 17 malignant mesothelioma cases reported in the population not exposed to asbestos, eight had excessive amounts of amphibole in their lung tissues, and disputed the original authors' statement that there were no neighbourhood cases
    • The author stated that after Cape left, the factory was occupied by another manufacturer for several more years in a not entirely decontaminated state
    • The author questioned whether lung fibre counts can separate asbestos-caused from non-asbestos tumours, citing sampling and counting uncertainty and overlap between exposed and unexposed people
    • In their reply, the original authors stated that, despite Bertram Mann's claims about asbestos related disease arising from asbestos pollution from the factory, a detailed analysis of tissue-proven mesotheliomas found no such case in a person living within two to four square miles of the factory who had not been employed at Acre Mill
    • In their reply, the original authors cited other reviews concluding that amphiboles have much greater potency than chrysotile for producing mesothelioma
  • The authors' conclusion: The author advised readers, given the original authors' more sanguine attitude to chrysotile, to await the forthcoming International Programme on Chemical Safety review of chrysotile

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Lung cancer.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma.

Browse more research in Occupational and Environmental Medicine, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

M. Greenberg. Mesothelioma in a community in the north of England. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1997;54(1):67-8. PMID: 9072041.

Cite our summary

“Mesothelioma in a community in the north of England.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/mesothelioma-in-a-community-in-the-north-of-england-1997.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.