No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Meta-Analysis of Different Procedures: The Importance of Recognizing the Spectrum of Pleurectomy/Decortication Techniques

Our plain-English summary of Meta-Analysis of Different Procedures: The Importance of Recognizing the Spectrum of Pleurectomy/Decortication Techniques, by C. Cao, D.H. Tian, H. Wolfenden, et al (The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2015).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: C. Cao, D.H. Tian, H. Wolfenden, J.E. Ozdirik, T.D. Yan
  • Journal: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Published: 2015;100(3):1133
  • Type of article: Letter, Comment
  • Cited by: 2 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher

In plain English

This is a letter to the editor, not a study, and it reports no new patient data. The authors, who had published their own meta-analysis of mesothelioma surgery, criticized a meta-analysis by Taioli and colleagues that compared pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) with extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). They noted that the International Mesothelioma Interest Group divides P/D into "extended P/D," "P/D," and "partial pleurectomy," and that only extended P/D aims to remove all visible tumor, as EPP does. They argued that Taioli and colleagues grouped procedures from partial pleurectomy to extended P/D together, which may explain the statistical heterogeneity found. They also wrote that the survival analysis gave a 1-patient study the same weight as one with more than 300, that the 2-year time frame was arbitrary, and that one study's figures differed from the original article: 8.2% and 22.2% 2-year mortality for P/D and EPP, against 91.1% and 77.5%. The authors concluded that the meta-analysis reached the same conclusion as theirs but had inaccuracies in design, data collection, and statistical analysis.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Letter to the editor commenting on another group's published meta-analysis; no new data
  • Who was studied: No patients studied; the letter discusses the studies pooled in the Taioli and colleagues meta-analysis of P/D versus EPP
  • Exposure: No asbestos exposure was studied. The subject is types of surgery: pleurectomy/decortication (classified as extended P/D, P/D, and partial pleurectomy) compared with extrapleural pneumonectomy
  • Main results:
    • The authors stated that only extended P/D removes all gross tumor with the same intent of complete cytoreduction as EPP
    • The authors argued that Taioli and colleagues pooled P/D procedures ranging from partial pleurectomy to extended P/D, which may account for the significant statistical heterogeneity detected
    • The authors stated that each comparative study in their own meta-analysis reported on extended P/D
    • The authors wrote that the median survival analysis gave studies with as few as 1 patient the same weight as studies with more than 300 patients
    • The authors called the 2-year time frame for survival arbitrary and said data extractable from Kaplan-Meier graphs in some studies were excluded
    • The authors reported that the analyzed 2-year mortality of 8.2% for P/D and 22.2% for EPP differed from the 91.1% and 77.5%, respectively, reported in the original article by Allen and colleagues
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that, although the Taioli meta-analysis reached the same conclusion as their own earlier report, it had a number of inaccuracies in study design, data collection, and statistical analysis
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The authors acknowledged that their own earlier meta-analysis included fewer studies

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Meta-Analysis, Pleurectomy/Decortication (P/D).

Browse more research in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

C. Cao, D.H. Tian, H. Wolfenden, J.E. Ozdirik, T.D. Yan. Meta-Analysis of Different Procedures: The Importance of Recognizing the Spectrum of Pleurectomy/Decortication Techniques. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2015;100(3):1133. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.050. PMID: 26354657.

Cite our summary

“Meta-Analysis of Different Procedures: The Importance of Recognizing the Spectrum of Pleurectomy/Decortication Techniques.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/meta-analysis-of-different-procedures-the-importance-of-recognizing.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.