Our plain-English summary of Nanoparticles and potential human health implications: past and future directions. Preface, by M. Gulumian, V. Vallyathan (Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part a, 2010).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: M. Gulumian, V. Vallyathan
- Journal: Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part a
- Published: 2010;73(5):339-40
- Cited by: 7 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
Summary of the article
This preface introduced a special issue of the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health containing selected presentations from the 9th International Conference on Particles: Risks and Opportunities. The conference was held in Cape Town, South Africa, on September 2-5, 2008. It was the first in the series held outside North America and Europe, and it covered fine particles, including engineered nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm. The authors traced the series back to a first conference in 1979 at the Medical Research Council Pneumoconiosis Unit in Penarth, Wales. They summarized earlier research showing that the toxicity of mineral particles such as asbestos, crystalline silica and coal dust depended on physicochemical properties, including particle size, surface area, surface charge and surface reactivity. That research also linked enhanced generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species to inflammation, fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis. The authors stated that a similar paradigm of oxidant generation, oxidative stress and inflammation was encountered with most nanoparticles produced for industrial and biomedical uses. They noted that the 7th and 8th conferences had discussed evidence that ambient fine particles affected organs outside the respiratory tract, including the cardiovascular system and possibly the brain. The authors stated that many questions about mineral dust-induced disease remained unanswered and that unexpected adverse health effects of nanotechnology were a major concern. The Cape Town conference included 48 presentations, a few of which were selected for the special issue.
PubMed has no abstract for this study, and the article doesn't print one. We wrote this summary from the full article with the help of AI. It is not the authors' wording.
In plain English
This article is a two-page preface, not a research study. The authors introduced a special issue of the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. The issue contains selected presentations from the 9th international conference in a series on fine particles, held in Cape Town, South Africa, on September 2-5, 2008. It was the first in the series held outside North America and Europe. The preface gave background rather than new data. The authors described decades of research on mineral particles such as asbestos, crystalline silica and coal dust. They wrote that this research linked particle properties, such as size, surface area and surface reactivity, and the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species to fibroproliferative (scarring-type) diseases and to cancer development. They wrote that the same pattern of oxygen-species generation, oxidative stress and inflammation is seen with most nanoparticles made for industrial and biomedical uses. The conference covered engineered nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm. The authors stated that unexpected harm to human health from nanotechnology is a major concern. The preface reported no measurements, patients or exposure levels of its own.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Preface (editorial introduction) to a special issue of conference proceedings; not a research study
- Who was studied: No study population. The preface introduces selected presentations from the 9th international conference on fine particles, held in Cape Town, South Africa, September 2-5, 2008, the first in the series held outside North America and Europe
- Exposure: Discussed in general terms: mineral particles and fibers such as asbestos, crystalline silica and coal dust, ambient air particles, and engineered nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm
- Main results:
- Background statement, not a new finding: the authors wrote that earlier investigations established particle properties such as size, surface area, surface charge, zeta potential, surface chemical composition and surface reactivity as important in toxicity and disease-causing ability
- Background statement, not a new finding: the authors wrote that particle-induced generation of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species is involved in the development of fibroproliferative diseases and carcinogenesis
- Background statement, not a new finding: the authors wrote that the pattern seen with asbestos, silica and coal, ROS generation leading to oxidative stress and inflammation, is encountered with most nanoparticles produced for industrial and biomedical applications
- The authors' conclusion: The authors stated that, with the arrival of nanotechnology and its diverse industrial and biomedical uses, unexpected adverse human health effects are a major concern. They wrote that advances reported at these meetings and current toxicity models will contribute to understanding the toxicology of nanoparticles.
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pneumoconiosis, Crystalline, Surface Reactivity, Inflammation, Carcinogenesis, Oxidative Stress.
Related studies
- Nanoparticles, human health hazard and regulation — A. Seaton, L. Tran, et al. (2010)
- Identification of hazardous nanoparticles present in the Caribbean Sea for the allocation of future preservation projects — L.F.O. Silva, L.P. Lozano, et al. (2021)
- Form Follows Function: Nanoparticle Shape and Its Implications for Nanomedicine — C. Kinnear, T.L. Moore, et al. (2017)
- Cytotoxic responses and potential respiratory health effects of carbon and carbonaceous nanoparticulates in the Paso del Norte airshed environment — K.F. Soto, L.E. Murr, et al. (2008)
- The ghost of public health journalism: past, present, and future — G.S. Cooper, R.C. Brown (2010)
- In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility — T.J. Brunner, P. Wick, et al. (2006)
Browse more research in Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part a, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
M. Gulumian, V. Vallyathan. Nanoparticles and potential human health implications: past and future directions. Preface. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part a 2010;73(5):339-40. doi:10.1080/15287390903584339. PMID: 20155576.
Cite our summary
“Nanoparticles and potential human health implications: past and future directions. Preface.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/nanoparticles-and-potential-human-health-implications-past-and-future.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.