No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Re: Call for an International Ban on Asbestos

Our plain-English summary of Re: Call for an International Ban on Asbestos, by C. Maltoni (American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2000).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This is a letter to the editor, not a research study. The author, Secretary General of the Collegium Ramazzini, supported the Collegium's Call for an International Ban on Asbestos. The author stated that asbestos harm is proven but underestimated in the scientific literature, because many cases go unreported or are incorrectly diagnosed. As an example, the author wrote that 92 cases of mesothelioma among people exposed to asbestos on the railways had been reported internationally up to 1986, and 141 in total by the time of writing. The author's group had gathered another 183 cases in Italy alone since 1986. The author reported having tested chrysotile and various amphiboles in rats under the same experimental conditions without observing meaningful differences in carcinogenic potency. The letter gives no detailed protocol and no numerical results for these experiments. The author also described a 1907 Italian lawsuit in which medical records showed that 8 of 10 deaths among workers between 1902 and 1906 were due to lung diseases. The author criticized defenders of chrysotile.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: letter to the editor (opinion/commentary)
  • Who was studied: No study population. The letter refers to mesothelioma cases in people exposed to asbestos on railways, including 183 cases the author's group gathered in Italy from 1986 onward, and to workers in an asbestos-factory town in Piedmont, Italy, 1902 to 1906.
  • Exposure: Asbestos in general, with particular discussion of chrysotile compared with amphiboles. Also railway asbestos exposure and 'family contact' with an exposed family member.
  • Main results:
    • Railway-related mesothelioma: 92 cases reported in the international literature up to 1986, and 141 in total reported internationally by the time of writing.
    • In Italy alone, the author's group gathered another 183 railway-related mesothelioma cases from 1986 onward, through an investigation the author described as diligent but not sufficient.
    • The author reported that rat experiments under the same conditions showed no meaningful differences in carcinogenic potency between chrysotile and various amphiboles. The letter gives no detailed protocol and no numerical results for these experiments.
    • The author stated that the scientific literature underestimates asbestos disease, partly because many cases are not reported or are incorrectly diagnosed.
    • In a 1907 Italian lawsuit, medical documentation showed that 8 of 10 deaths among workers between 1902 and 1906 were due to lung diseases.
  • The authors' conclusion: The author considered the burden of asbestos on exposed workers and citizens proven and stated pride in the Collegium Ramazzini's Call for an International Ban on Asbestos.

Browse more research in American Journal of Industrial Medicine, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

C. Maltoni. Re: Call for an International Ban on Asbestos. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2000;37(2):230-1. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200002)37:2<230::aid-ajim10>3.0.co;2-n. PMID: 10615105.

Cite our summary

“Re: Call for an International Ban on Asbestos.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/re-call-for-an-international-ban-on-asbestos-2000-10615105.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.