No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Our plain-English summary of Response, by Y. Xu, M. Zheng, A. Khuong, et al (Chest, 2013).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: Y. Xu, M. Zheng, A. Khuong, R.E. Merritt, J.B. Shrager, H.A. Wakelee, R.A. Kratzke, C.D. Hoang
  • Journal: Chest
  • Published: 2013;144(6):1971-1972
  • Type of article: Letter, Comment
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher

In plain English

This item is not a research study. It is a letter in which the authors replied to criticism of their earlier CHEST article (November 2013), which reported that a microRNA called miR-1 induces growth arrest and apoptosis (programmed cell death) in malignant mesothelioma. A letter from Wright and colleagues at the Asbestos Diseases Research Institute had asked why candidate microRNAs were validated in only four of 26 tumors, why only miR-1 was studied further, and whether enough detail on methods was given. In reply, the authors stated that they chose the validation samples because those tissue specimens were plentiful and would not be exhausted. They described validating a subset as a well-accepted, cost-effective practice. They said they chose miR-1 because of ongoing interest in it. Testing known apoptosis genes was meant to confirm the cell-death effect in treated cell lines. Identifying miR-1's direct gene targets was never a goal of the study. The letter reported no new data. The authors restated that overexpressing miR-1 in mesothelioma cell lines induced apoptosis, and they welcomed independent studies. Asbestos exposure was not discussed.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Letter to the editor (author reply to correspondence about their earlier article); no new data
  • Who was studied: No new population. The reply discusses the authors' earlier study of human mesothelioma tissue specimens and mesothelioma cell lines.
  • Exposure: No asbestos or fiber exposure is discussed. The subject is microRNA (miR-1) in mesothelioma.
  • Main results:
    • The critics' letter questioned why validation of candidate microRNAs was done in only four of 26 tumors profiled by microarray.
    • The authors stated that the validation samples were chosen because the specimens were plentiful, not by cherry-picking.
    • The authors stated that they chose miR-1 for functional analysis because of their ongoing interest in it.
    • The authors argued that correlating miR-1 with its gene targets would not be highly useful.
    • The authors stated that the Kubo et al. article cited by the critics was not a microarray profiling study but a study of miR-34b methylation.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors disagreed that their study did not contribute to knowledge. They restated their earlier report that overexpression of miR-1 in mesothelioma cell lines induces apoptosis, and they welcomed independent studies of miR-1 in mesothelioma.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The authors stated that identifying and confirming miR-1's direct gene targets was outside the scope of their study.

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Lung cancer, Mesothelioma.

Browse more research in Chest, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

Y. Xu, M. Zheng, A. Khuong, R.E. Merritt, J.B. Shrager, H.A. Wakelee, et al. Response. Chest 2013;144(6):1971-1972. doi:10.1378/chest.13-1931. PMID: 24297135.

Cite our summary

“Response.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/response-2013.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.