No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Safety and biodistribution of 111In-amatuximab in patients with mesothelin expressing cancers using single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging

Our plain-English summary of Safety and biodistribution of 111In-amatuximab in patients with mesothelin expressing cancers using single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging, by L. Lindenberg, A. Thomas, S. Adler, et al (Oncotarget, 2015).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: L. Lindenberg, A. Thomas, S. Adler, E. Mena, K. Kurdziel, J. Maltzman, B. Wallin, K. Hoffman, I. Pastan, C.H. Paik, P. Choyke, R. Hassan
  • Journal: Oncotarget
  • Published: 2015;6(6):4496-504
  • Cited by: 43 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

Abstract

Amatuximab is a chimeric high-affinity monoclonal IgG1/k antibody targeting mesothelin that is being developed for treatment of mesothelin-expressing cancers. Considering the ongoing clinical development of amatuximab in these cancers, our objective was to characterize the biodistribution, and dosimetry of 111Indium (111In) radiolabelled amatuximab in mesothelin-expressing cancers. Between October 2011 and February 2013, six patients including four with malignant mesothelioma and two with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging following administration of 111In amatuximab. SPECT/CT images were obtained at 2-4 hours, 24-48 hours and 96-168 hours after radiotracer injection. In all patients, tumor to background ratios (TBR) consistently met or exceeded an uptake of 1.2 (range 1.2-62.0) which is considered the minimum TBR that can be visualized. TBRs were higher in tumors of patients with mesothelioma than pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 111In-amatuximab uptake was noted in both primary tumors and metastatic sites. The radiotracer dose was generally well-tolerated and demonstrated physiologic uptake in the heart, liver, kidneys and spleen. This is the first study to show tumor localization of an anti-mesothelin antibody in humans. Our results show that 111In-amatuximab was well tolerated with a favorable dosimetry profile. It localizes to mesothelin expressing cancers with a higher uptake in mesothelioma than pancreatic cancer.

In plain English

This prospective, single-institution trial tested a radioactively labelled antibody, 111In-amatuximab, which targets the protein mesothelin, in patients with mesothelin-expressing cancers. Seven patients enrolled and six were imaged between October 2011 and February 2013. Four had malignant mesothelioma and two had pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients were scanned with SPECT/CT at 2–4 hours, 24–48 hours and 96–168 hours after injection. In every patient and at every time point, the tumor-to-background ratio was at least 1.2 (range 1.2 to 62.0), which the article describes as the minimum that can be visualized. Ratios were higher in mesothelioma than in pancreatic adenocarcinoma at all time points, but these differences were not statistically significant. The most strongly increased uptake was seen in two distant metastatic lesions. The liver received the highest estimated radiation dose (0.041 mGy/MBq), and no treatment-emergent adverse effects were observed. Serum CA125 rose significantly 14 days after injection (p = 0.03), while serum mesothelin did not change significantly. The authors concluded that the antibody localizes to primary and metastatic sites of these cancers. They named the small number of patients as a major limitation.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Prospective, single-institution imaging trial (biodistribution, dosimetry and safety study of a radiolabelled antibody)
  • Who was studied: 7 patients enrolled and 6 imaged between October 2011 and February 2013: 4 with malignant mesothelioma and 2 with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Median age was 66 (range 53–73); 2 were women and 4 were men. One patient was withdrawn because they could not lie flat on the scanner.
  • Exposure: Not an asbestos exposure study. Patients received approximately 5 mCi of 111In-amatuximab intravenously. The first five patients were first given 50 mg of unlabelled amatuximab; the last patient received the radiotracer alone.
  • Main results:
    • In all 6 imaged patients and at all imaging time points, target lesion tumor-to-background ratio was at least 1.2 (range 1.2 to 62.0), the minimum considered visible.
    • Tumor-to-background ratios were higher in the 4 mesothelioma patients than in the 2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients at all time points, but the differences were not statistically significant.
    • Strongly increased uptake was seen in two distant metastatic lesions: the left external iliac node in patient 2 and a gastroesophageal mass in patient 3. Uptake in primary tumor sites was more modest.
    • The estimated effective dose was 0.15 mSv/MBq. The liver received the highest absorbed dose (0.041 mGy/MBq), followed by the stomach wall (0.023 mGy/MBq).
    • No treatment-emergent adverse effects were observed. Of the 4 patients with no detectable human antichimeric antibodies (HACA) at baseline, 3 developed low titers two weeks after the radiotracer.
    • In the 6 patients, serum CA125 increased significantly from a mean of 303 before injection to a mean of 494 fourteen days after (p = 0.03). Serum mesothelin levels before and after were not significantly different (p = 0.16).
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that a radiolabelled anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody localizes to the primary and metastatic sites of mesothelin-expressing cancers, and that 111In-amatuximab was well tolerated with a favorable dosimetry profile.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The small number of patients assessed
    • Pathologic confirmation of mesothelin expression was not required for study entry in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and mesothelioma
    • Variability in post-injection imaging time points and use of organ volume approximation for dosimetry estimates

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Lung cancer, Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelin, Monoclonal Antibody, Mesothelioma, Adenocarcinoma.

Browse more research in Oncotarget, or return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

L. Lindenberg, A. Thomas, S. Adler, E. Mena, K. Kurdziel, J. Maltzman, et al. Safety and biodistribution of 111In-amatuximab in patients with mesothelin expressing cancers using single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging. Oncotarget 2015;6(6):4496-504. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2883. PMID: 25756664.

Cite our summary

“Safety and biodistribution of 111In-amatuximab in patients with mesothelin expressing cancers using single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/safety-and-biodistribution-of-111in-amatuximab-in-patients-with.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.