Significance of asbestos in lung tissue

Our plain-English summary of Significance of asbestos in lung tissue, by J.C. Wagner (Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1972).

The study

• Author: J.C. Wagner
• Journal: Journal of Clinical Pathology
• Published: 1972;25(6):557
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

In plain English

This item is an abstract of a talk the author, of the Pneumoconiosis Research Unit in Penarth, gave at the 88th general meeting of the Association of Clinical Pathologists. It reports no patients, measurements or numerical study results. The author explained that in 1964 a working group looked at the available information on cancers associated with exposure to asbestos dust. The group recommended an international study drawing on epidemiology, pathology, and dust physics and chemistry. The aim was to learn whether a certain type of asbestos was responsible for mesotheliomas of the pleura and peritoneum and for carcinomata of the lung. If one type could be implicated, it might be possible to define the risk from other types of fibre. Eight years later, the author wrote, the results of most of these investigations were being correlated. At that point it appeared that a certain type of fibre was more dangerous than the others, and its use had been restricted in Britain. The abstract does not name that fibre type or include the evidence the talk was to present.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Abstract of a meeting presentation describing an international research programme; no original data reported
• Who was studied: No study population is described. The abstract refers to an international multidisciplinary study recommended by a working group in 1964.
• Exposure: Asbestos dust, specifically whether one type of asbestos fibre was responsible for the cancers; the fibre type is not named
• Main results:
  • The question studied was whether a certain fibre type was responsible for mesotheliomas of the pleura and peritoneum and carcinomata of the lung
  • After eight years, the results of most of the investigations were being correlated
  • At the time of writing it appeared that a certain type of fibre (not named) was more dangerous than the others
  • The use of this material had been restricted in Britain
• The authors' conclusion: The author stated that the talk would present the evidence for incriminating a certain (unnamed) type of fibre

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Lung cancer.

Related studies

• Quantitation of asbestos and asbestos-like fibers in human lung tissue by hot and wet ashing, and the significance of their presence for survival of lung carcinoma and mesothelioma patients — K. Kayser, C. Becker, et al. (1999)
• The prognostic significance of BAP1, NF2, and CDKN2A in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma — A.D. Singhi, A.M. Krasinskas, et al. (2016)
• Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic significance of clinical and pathologic parameters and validation of a nuclear-grading system in a multi-institutional series of 225 cases — D.B. Chapel, J.J. Schulte, et al. (2021)
• Prognostic significance of Ki67 expression in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma — K. Pillai, M.H. Pourgholami, et al. (2015)
• Prognostic significance of morphological growth patterns and mitotic index of epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma — A.M. Krasinskas, A.C. Borczuk, et al. (2016)
• Immunohistochemical evaluation of two antibodies against PD-L1 and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma: A RENAPE study — S. Valmary-Degano, P. Colpart, et al. (2017)

Browse more research in Journal of Clinical Pathology, or return to medical research.