No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Surgery in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Our plain-English summary of Surgery in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, by R. Bueno, I. Opitz, IASLC Mesothelioma Taskforce (Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2018).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: R. Bueno, I. Opitz, IASLC Mesothelioma Taskforce
  • Journal: Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Published: 2018;13(11):1638-1654
  • Type of article: Review
  • Cited by: 71 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher

Abstract

Surgical intervention plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and can be applied with curative or palliative intent. The overall aim of surgery should be, as in any oncologic surgery, the macroscopic complete resection (MCR) of the tumor. Most importantly, the majority of patients with the diagnosis of MPM should be appropriately staged and initially evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting, including medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgery after histologic diagnosis. Surgical staging, including determination of the histologic subtype and lymph node status, as well as clinical staging with positron-emission tomography-computer tomography scan and determination of cardiopulmonary reserve are crucial. Herein, we summarize the role of surgical resection, specifically macroscopic complete resection, performed as extrapleural pneumonectomy or extended pleurectomy/decortication in multimodality treatment settings and advocate for optimal patient selection for one or the other procedure. In addition, the roles of surgery in diagnosis of MPM and in palliative care are discussed.

Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.

In plain English

This is a review article by two thoracic surgeons, written on behalf of the IASLC Mesothelioma Taskforce. It summarized earlier published work on surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma. It also briefly mentioned an unpublished quality-of-life analysis of the authors' own patients. It covered surgical biopsy for diagnosis, extrapleural pneumonectomy (removal of the pleura and lung, usually with the diaphragm and pericardium), and pleurectomy/decortication (removal of the pleura while sparing the lung, sometimes with the diaphragm and pericardium). It also covered palliative surgery and surgery for recurrence. The review cited a meta-analysis in which short-term deaths were significantly more common after extrapleural pneumonectomy (4.5%) than after pleurectomy/decortication (1.7%). That meta-analysis found no significant difference in 2-year mortality. It cited database data showing more postoperative lung failure (ARDS) at centers doing fewer than five extrapleural pneumonectomies a year. The authors said the studies differed widely, which made the two operations hard to compare. The authors concluded that surgery has a role at all stages of the disease, and that the field has moved toward pleurectomy/decortication. The article does not discuss asbestos exposure.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: narrative review article
  • Who was studied: Published studies, trials, guidelines and database analyses on surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma, plus a brief mention of an unpublished quality-of-life analysis of the authors' own patients who had induction chemotherapy over a 2-year period
  • Main results:
    • In a cited meta-analysis (1,512 patients receiving pleurectomy/decortication and 1,391 receiving extrapleural pneumonectomy), short-term mortality was significantly higher in the extrapleural pneumonectomy group (4.5%) than in the pleurectomy/decortication group (1.7%)
    • In the same meta-analysis, 2-year mortality did not differ significantly between the groups (23.8% versus 25%), but the included studies were significantly heterogeneous
    • Of 17 studies in the meta-analysis that reported median survival, 53% reported longer median survival with extrapleural pneumonectomy and 47% with pleurectomy/decortication
    • In a cited Society of Thoracic Surgeons database analysis, postoperative ARDS after extrapleural pneumonectomy occurred in 0 of 31 patients at centers doing five or more per year and in 8 of 64 (12.5%) at centers doing fewer than five per year
    • In the authors' own unpublished analysis, patients filled out quality-of-life questionnaires before surgery and at 6 weeks and 4 months after. After both procedures, some measures, such as general health score, vitality, social functioning and mental health, were better at 4 months than before the operation
    • The authors noted that in the MARS I trial, which concluded that extrapleural pneumonectomy offered no benefit, only 16 of 24 patients assigned to that arm received radical surgery. They said the trial was designed to test feasibility, not benefit
    • In the cited MesoVATS trial, survival was about the same, but VATS pleurectomy improved control of recurrent fluid build-up compared with talc pleurodesis
    • In a cited series of 47 patients who had chest wall resection for recurrence, median survival after the resection was 20.4 months in patients with the epithelioid subtype and 7.4 months in patients with the biphasic subtype
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that surgery has a role in managing malignant pleural mesothelioma at all stages, that surgeons should be involved in multimodality care, and that in the past decade the focus has moved toward pleurectomy/decortication as definitive treatment
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The authors said the published reports used different patient selection, treatment protocols, definitions of morbidity and ways of calculating survival. This made it hard to judge which operation is better
    • The authors said there are few data on quality of life after these operations
    • The authors said the literature on surgery for recurrence is scarce

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Lung cancer, Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pleural Mesothelioma, Staging, Palliative Care, Histological Subtype, Surgical Resection, Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP), Pleurectomy/Decortication (P/D).

Browse more research in Journal of Thoracic Oncology, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

R. Bueno, I. Opitz, IASLC Mesothelioma Taskforce. Surgery in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2018;13(11):1638-1654. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.001. PMID: 30121394.

Cite our summary

“Surgery in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/surgery-in-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.