No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

The debate on banning asbestos

Our plain-English summary of The debate on banning asbestos, by D.C. Muir (CMAJ, 2001).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Author: D.C. Muir
  • Journal: CMAJ
  • Published: 2001;165(9):1189; author reply 1191-3
  • Type of article: Comment, Letter
  • Read it: PubMed · Free full text

In plain English

This item is a letter to the editor, not a research study, and it reported no data. The writer, David C.F. Muir, an internist at Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation in Hamilton, Ontario, was responding to a set of CMAJ editorials about calls for a ban on asbestos. He said that a few years earlier he had written to the Canadian and Quebec governments. He had suggested that asbestos be exported only to countries that could ensure it was handled with the same precautions required by law in Canada, with some form of supervision by independent experts. He said the proposal did not receive support. He was told it was not practical, that it interfered with foreign countries, and that other exporters would fill the gap. He wrote that, without assurances about how asbestos is handled in receiving countries, there is a clear moral choice to make. He added that the same issues should concern those who profit from exporting pesticides. The same page also printed separate letters by other writers, which are not covered here.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Letter to the editor (correspondence); opinion, no study or data
  • Exposure: Canadian asbestos exports; the writer proposed limiting exports to countries that apply Canada's legislated handling precautions
  • The authors' conclusion: The writer's view was that, without assurances about how asbestos is handled in receiving countries, there is a clear moral choice to make about exporting it.

Browse more research in CMAJ, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

D.C. Muir. The debate on banning asbestos. CMAJ 2001;165(9):1189; author reply 1191-3. PMID: 11706901.

Cite our summary

“The debate on banning asbestos.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/the-debate-on-banning-asbestos-2001-11706901.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.