The effects of polyvinyl pyridine-N-oxide (P204) on the cytopathogenic action of chrysotile asbestos in vivo and in vitro

Our plain-English summary of The effects of polyvinyl pyridine-N-oxide (P204) on the cytopathogenic action of chrysotile asbestos in vivo and in vitro, by J.M. Davis (British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 1972).

The study

• Author: J.M. Davis
• Journal: British Journal of Experimental Pathology
• Published: 1972;53(6):652-8
• Cited by: 9 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Free full text

Abstract

A series of experiments was undertaken to test the action of polyvinyl pyridine-N-oxide (P204) on the cytopathic effects of chrysotile asbestos dust in experimental animals. Organ culture studies were undertaken using pieces of guinea-pig lung, and in addition to this the lesions produced by the intrapleural injection of chrysotile were studied after treatment with varying doses of P204. The results from both series of experiments were unfortunately negative and P204 appeared unable to modify asbestos lesions in any way. These findings contrast sharply with the marked ability of P204 to protect tissues from the effects of silica dust. It is suggested that these differences are due to the fact that while silica is rapidly toxic to macrophages, asbestos is not and many healthy macrophages and giant cells can be found in asbestos lesions packed with dust several weeks after injection. The fibrous tissue that is eventually produced in response to asbestos dust is probably produced by a slower and more insidious process than that stimulated by silica, and this process is not modified by the presence of P204.

In plain English

This laboratory study tested whether a polymer, polyvinyl pyridine-N-oxide (P204), could change the damage caused by chrysotile asbestos. Earlier research cited by the author had reported that P204 protects cells against silica dust. The author used two approaches. In the first, pieces of guinea-pig lung were kept alive in culture and injected with chrysotile and P204. In the second, chrysotile was injected with P204 into the pleural (chest) cavity of guinea-pigs, rats and mice. Rats and guinea-pigs received 25 mg of chrysotile and mice 10 mg, with P204 given on three different schedules. In culture, results were very similar to the author's earlier experiments with asbestos alone. One difference was that, with P204, the membranes around engulfed fibers were sometimes distorted without breaking. In the animals, P204 did not appear to change the size or microscopic structure of the masses of cells (granulomata) that formed. It did not affect asbestos body formation, and the electron microscope showed no differences. The author concluded that asbestos lesions apparently cannot be modified by compounds such as P204, probably because asbestos showed low toxicity to cells in short-term experiments.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Animal experiments: organ culture of guinea-pig lung tissue (in vitro) plus intrapleural injection in live animals (in vivo), with three series of experiments in each species using different P204 timing schedules
• Who was studied: Guinea-pig lung tissue kept in culture for 1 hour to 14 days; live guinea-pigs, rats and mice injected in the upper right pleural cavity and killed at intervals from 7 days to 1 year after injection. The number of animals is not stated.
• Exposure: Chrysotile asbestos dust, almost entirely fibrous, mostly bundles less than 5 micrometres long. Doses were 25 mg for guinea-pigs and rats and 10 mg for mice. P204 was given at 80 mg/kg (guinea-pigs), 200 mg/kg (rats) and 400 mg/kg (mice), either only with the asbestos, also 48 hours before it, or followed by 3 further injections at 2-week intervals. In culture, the doses were about 25 mg asbestos and 10 mg P204 per ml. P204 is a polymer that earlier work cited by the author found protective against silica.
• Main results:
  • In guinea-pig lung organ culture, results with P204 were very similar to the author's previous experiments with asbestos dust alone.
  • One difference in culture: with P204, the membrane around engulfed dust was sometimes distorted by chrysotile fiber bundles without rupturing. Some dust still escaped into the cell cytoplasm.
  • In guinea-pigs, rats and mice, P204 did not appear to change the size or microscopic structure of the pleural granulomata produced by chrysotile.
  • This held in all 3 experimental series; varying the timing and dosage of P204 made no difference.
  • P204 did not affect the formation of asbestos bodies.
  • Electron microscopy of granulomata from all 3 species showed no differences between P204-treated and untreated animals.
• The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that the results suggest lesions produced by asbestos dust cannot be modified by polymer compounds such as P204. The author linked this to the low toxicity of asbestos observed in short-term experiments.
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The study did not clarify how P204 protects against silica, whether by stabilizing cell membranes or by coating dust particles.
  • The author noted that membranes withstanding distortion by fibers could reflect normal membrane flexibility rather than a protective effect of P204.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Chrysotile, Macrophage.

Related studies

• An 11-year longitudinal study of the occupational dust exposure and lung function of polyvinyl chloride, cement and asbestos cement factory workers — A. Siracusa, A. Forcina, et al. (1988)
• Effects of chrysotile and acid-treated chrysotile on macrophage cultures — E.G. Beck, P.F. Holt, et al. (1971)
• Antagonizing the Hedgehog Pathway with Vismodegib Impairs Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Growth In Vivo by Affecting Stroma — M. Meerang, K. Bérard, et al. (2016)
• Biological in vitro and in vivo responses of chrysotile versus amphiboles — J. Bignon, M.C. Jaurand (1983)
• Nitric oxide (NO) enhances pemetrexed cytotoxicity via NO‑cGMP signaling in lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo — H. Nagai, H. Yasuda, et al. (2012)
• Change of heme oxygenase-1 expression in lung injury induced by chrysotile asbestos in vivo and in vitro — H. Nagatomo, Y. Morimoto, et al. (2007)

Browse more research in British Journal of Experimental Pathology, or return to medical research.