No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

The future of mesothelioma treatment: time to shift gear

Our plain-English summary of The future of mesothelioma treatment: time to shift gear, by M. Maio, L. Calabrò (The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine, 2019).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

In plain English

This was a short commentary, not an original study. The authors discussed another group's trial: the phase 3 part of the LUME-Meso study by Scagliotti and colleagues, in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. They noted that standard treatment for unresectable pleural mesothelioma was still a platinum-based drug plus pemetrexed, with median overall survival of around 1 year. As the commentary described it, the earlier phase 2 part of LUME-Meso had reported improved progression-free survival when nintedanib was added to chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.91). In the phase 3 part, 458 patients were randomly assigned to cisplatin and pemetrexed plus nintedanib (229) or placebo (229). Median progression-free survival (6.8 vs 7.0 months) and median overall survival (14.4 vs 16.1 months) were similar between the groups. The authors suggested testing drugs that target blood-vessel growth in carefully selected patient subgroups through small studies. They wrote that whether immune checkpoint drugs will begin a new era in mesothelioma therapy remains to be established.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Commentary (a journal 'Comment' article) on another research group's published randomised phase 3 trial (LUME-Meso, by Scagliotti and colleagues); not original research by these authors
  • Who was studied: The commentary concerns patients with advanced or unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. The trial it discusses (LUME-Meso phase 3) enrolled 458 patients with epithelioid histology and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology performance status score of 0 or 1. The commentary gives no country or study dates for that trial.
  • Exposure: No asbestos exposure is discussed. The treatment examined in the trial under comment was nintedanib (a triple angiokinase inhibitor) or placebo, each added to cisplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy.
  • Main results:
    • As reported in the commentary, in the phase 3 LUME-Meso trial by Scagliotti and colleagues, median progression-free survival was 6.8 months in the nintedanib group vs 7.0 months in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 14.4 months vs 16.1 months. The two groups were similar.
    • As described in the commentary, the earlier phase 2 LUME-Meso study had observed improved progression-free survival when nintedanib was added to standard chemotherapy in untreated patients (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.91; p=0.017). For overall survival the HR was 0.77 (0.46 to 1.29; p=0.319).
    • The commentary notes that an exploratory analysis by Scagliotti and colleagues suggested improved overall and progression-free survival in nintedanib-treated patients who had a high platelet count at baseline. The commentary authors called this intriguing and possibly worth further exploration.
    • The authors stated that the standard treatment for unresectable pleural mesothelioma was still a platinum-based drug plus pemetrexed. They gave median overall survival for these patients as around 1 year.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors suggested that the anti-angiogenic approach might be explored in selected patient subgroups through small proof-of-principle studies, rather than large phase 3 trials in unselected patients. They wrote that whether immune checkpoint targeting will begin a new era in mesothelioma therapy remains to be established.

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma.

Browse more research in The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

M. Maio, L. Calabrò. The future of mesothelioma treatment: time to shift gear. The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine 2019;7(7):554-555. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30171-7. PMID: 31103413.

Cite our summary

“The future of mesothelioma treatment: time to shift gear.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/the-future-of-mesothelioma-treatment-time-to-shift-gear.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.