Our plain-English summary of Toxicology of the lung, by D. Dinsdale (Respiratory Medicine, 1993).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Author: D. Dinsdale
- Journal: Respiratory Medicine
- Published: 1993;87(4):279-84
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
In plain English
This article was the author's report on a joint meeting of the British Association for Lung Research and the British Toxicology Society, held on 25 September 1992 at the University of Wales and attended by 152 participants. It was not an original study. It summarized talks on lung toxicology, including isolating lung cells, drug metabolism in the lung, free radicals, chemically induced oxidative stress, the genetics of lung tumours in mice, and pulmonary hypertension. In the asbestos session, Dr Chris Wagner was reported as saying that inhaling asbestos dust may lead to asbestosis, carcinoma of the lung, pleural scarring, or diffuse mesotheliomas of the pleura and peritoneum. He was also reported as saying that chrysotile is only associated with malignant disease when contaminated with tremolite, and that mesotheliomas are usually caused by crocidolite. Dr Bob Brown reported that, of nine fibre types from the Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association tested for free radical generation, rock wool provoked the greatest response. He also reported that all assays of biological effect indicated that glass and other man-made fibres are much less of a hazard than asbestos.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Meeting report (summary of talks at a scientific symposium); not an original study
- Who was studied: A one-day joint meeting of two societies on 25 September 1992 at the University of Wales, attended by 152 participants from academic, clinical and industrial laboratories; no study subjects of its own
- Exposure: Lung toxicants generally. In the asbestos session: asbestos and other mineral fibres, including chrysotile, tremolite, amosite, anthophyllite (printed 'anthopholite') and crocidolite, plus man-made fibres such as rock wool and glass
- Main results:
- Dr Chris Wagner was reported as stating that inhaling asbestos dust may lead to four diseases: asbestosis, carcinoma of the lung, pleural scarring, or diffuse mesotheliomas of the pleura and peritoneum
- Dr Wagner was reported as stating that chrysotile is only associated with malignant disease when contaminated with the amphibole tremolite
- Dr Wagner was reported as stating that over 100 million fibres per gram of lung are often required to cause asbestosis
- Dr Wagner was reported as stating that the association of asbestosis with carcinoma is much more marked (50-fold) in smokers
- Dr Wagner was reported as stating that mesotheliomas are usually caused by crocidolite
- Dr Wagner was reported as stating that the most dangerous fibres are needle-shaped (acicular), over 8 micrometres long and less than 0.25 micrometres in diameter
- Dr Wagner was reported as stating that asbestos and other mineral fibres are responsible for legal costs of over $100 million each year in the U.S.A. alone
- Dr Bob Brown reported that, of nine Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association fibre types assessed for free radical generation in vitro, rock wool provoked the greatest response
- Dr Brown reported that all assays of biological effect indicate that glass and other man-made fibres are much less of a hazard than asbestos
- The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that the meeting provided a valuable overview of current progress in lung toxicology. On fibres, the report stated that a full understanding of fibre toxicity will require much more work.
- Limitations the authors state:
- The author noted that some topics may have been under-represented at the meeting
Related studies
- Particle toxicology: from coal mining to nanotechnology — P.J. Borm (2002)
- The toxicological response of Brazilian chrysotile asbestos: a multidose subchronic 90-day inhalation toxicology study with 92-day recovery to assess cellular and pathological response — D.M. Bernstein, R. Rogers, et al. (2006)
- Final results from a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study evaluating the dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos: Histopathological examination, confocal microscopy and collagen quantification of the lung and pleural cavity — D.M. Bernstein, B. Toth, et al. (2021)
- Evaluation of the dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to chrysotile or crocidolite asbestos in a 28-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study — D.M. Bernstein, B. Toth, et al. (2018)
- Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study - Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL — D.M. Bernstein, B. Toth, et al. (2020)
- Evaluation of the dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study - Interim results Part 2: Histopathological examination, Confocal microscopy and collagen quantification of the lung and pleural cavity — D.M. Bernstein, B. Toth, et al. (2020)
Browse more research in Respiratory Medicine, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
D. Dinsdale. Toxicology of the lung. Respiratory Medicine 1993;87(4):279-84. doi:10.1016/0954-6111(93)90023-s. PMID: 9728227.
Cite our summary
“Toxicology of the lung.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/toxicology-of-the-lung.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.