Our plain-English summary of Unexpected pleural finding after a fall, by C. Giraudo, A.S. Fraia, A. Bellini, et al (The Lancet. Oncology, 2019).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: C. Giraudo, A.S. Fraia, A. Bellini, F. Fortarezza, F. Rea, F. Calabrese
- Journal: The Lancet. Oncology
- Published: 2019;20(10):e606
- Type of article: Case report
- Cited by: 2 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher
In plain English
This case report describes one patient in Italy. A previously healthy 41-year-old man came to an emergency room near Verona in August 2017 after a fall and tibial fracture. A pre-surgical chest x-ray showed a large pleural opacity. He was a nonsmoker with no occupational exposure to dust, fumes, or vapours. The report does not describe any asbestos exposure for him. CT showed a well-defined 8.5 × 3 × 8 cm pleural lesion suggesting non-aggressive behaviour. A PET/CT scan, however, showed intense uptake (SUVmax 7.9), suggesting an aggressive malignancy. Tissue tests after surgical removal led to a diagnosis of localised malignant mesothelioma. The margins were free of tumour cells, and no chemotherapy was given. CT scans every 4 months showed no recurrence or spread up to 1 year and 3 months after diagnosis. The authors stated that this tumour is extremely rare and that the role of asbestos in it is still controversial. They added that without local invasion or pleural effusion, as in this patient, distinguishing it from benign or low-grade lesions on CT can be extremely challenging.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Case report (Clinical Picture) of a single patient
- Who was studied: One previously healthy 41-year-old man admitted to the emergency room of Legnago Hospital, near Verona, Italy, in August 2017 after an accidental fall and tibial fracture
- Exposure: No asbestos exposure is described for the patient; he was a nonsmoker without any occupational exposure to dust, fumes, or vapours
- Main results:
- CT showed a large, well-defined pleural lesion measuring 8.5 × 3 × 8 cm, without surrounding atelectasis or pleural effusion
- PET/CT showed intense uptake of the lesion (SUVmax 7.9), suggesting an aggressive malignancy
- The final diagnosis of localised malignant mesothelioma rested on two things. The tissue had epithelioid features. It also stained positive for cytokeratin markers (MNF116, AE1/AE3) and for the mesothelial markers calretinin, D2-40 and WT1
- Surgical resection was complete, with margins free from tumour cells at histology, and no chemotherapy was prescribed
- Follow-up CT scans every 4 months showed no local recurrence or metastatic spread, up to the last whole-body scan 1 year and 3 months after diagnosis
- The authors' conclusion: The authors stated that localised malignant mesothelioma is extremely rare and that the role of asbestos exposure in it is still controversial. They also said that when local invasion and pleural effusion are absent, as in this patient, distinguishing it from benign or low-grade lesions on CT can be extremely challenging. In their view, histology and immunohistochemistry remain the gold standard for precise characterisation
Topics
The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Mesothelioma.
Related studies
- Fibrolipoma of the left ventricle: an uncommon incidental autopsy finding — K. Fragkouli, A. Mitselou, et al. (2020)
- The rise and fall in incidence of malignant mesothelioma from a British Naval Dockyard, 1979-1999 — A.K. Hilliard, J.K. Lovett, et al. (2003)
- Canada and France fall out over the risks of asbestos — D. Butler, D. Spurgeon (1997)
- Ultra low dose CT screen-detected non-malignant incidental findings in the Western Australian Asbestos Review Programme — C.P. Murray, P.M. Wong, et al. (2016)
- Incidental finding of multiple well-differentiated papillary mesotheliomas in peritoneum — M. Jakobsen, B. Engvad, et al. (2016)
- Causative factors, imaging findings, and CT course of round atelectasis — L. Azour, T. Billah, et al. (2018)
Browse more research in The Lancet. Oncology, or return to medical research.
Cited on this site
How to cite it
Cite the study
C. Giraudo, A.S. Fraia, A. Bellini, F. Fortarezza, F. Rea, F. Calabrese. Unexpected pleural finding after a fall. The Lancet. Oncology 2019;20(10):e606. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30505-4. PMID: 31579006.
Cite our summary
“Unexpected pleural finding after a fall.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/unexpected-pleural-finding-after-a-fall.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.