No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

What is the significance of non-specific pleuritis? A trick question

Our plain-English summary of What is the significance of non-specific pleuritis? A trick question, by J. Janssen, F. Maldonado, M. Metintas (The Clinical Respiratory Journal, 2018).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

Abstract

Non-specific pleuritis (NSP) is defined as fibrinous or inflammatory pleuritis which cannot be attributed to a specific benign or malignant etiology. It can be diagnosed in biopsies in up to 30% of cases of exudative pleuritis after thoracoscopy, with a mean of 19.2%. In 66 out of 469 (14.2%) patients in combined series, a malignant pleural disease (mostly mesothelioma) was found during a follow-up of at least 21 months. Most likely, a follow-up time of 12 months is sufficient, although the current routine is a follow-up of 2 years. Because of a benign course in 85% of patients with NSP, a repeated invasive procedure after thoracoscopy is only indicated in a limited group of patients. The most important indications for a repeated pleural biopsy are persistent chest pain, recurrent pleural effusion, radiologic findings suggestive for malignant pleural disease.

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

In plain English

In this narrative review, the authors examined research on non-specific pleuritis: pleuritis on thoracoscopic biopsy that cannot be attributed to a specific benign or malignant cause. Pooling 5 studies, they counted 469 such diagnoses among 2434 thoracoscopies (5-31%, mean 19.2%). Of these patients, 66 (14.2%) had malignant pleural disease, mostly mesothelioma, identified during follow-up of at least 21 months. One reviewed study found female gender a significant risk factor for later malignancy, which the authors said may relate to women's higher cumulative asbestos exposure in a specific rural region of Turkey. Another reviewed study considered later surgical biopsy warranted, after thoracoscopy made difficult by fibrin layers and adhesions, if there was asbestos contact history or a CT scan suggestive of mesothelioma. They concluded one year of follow-up is most likely sufficient, although the routine is 2 years. They concluded that repeat invasive procedures are indicated only in a limited group, mainly patients with persistent chest pain on the side of the effusion, recurrent effusion, or CT findings suggestive of malignant pleural disease. They noted this one-year limit needs confirmation in future studies.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: narrative review of published literature on non-specific pleuritis, including diagnostic procedures and follow-up time
  • Who was studied: Patients with exudative pleural effusion whose thoracoscopic pleural biopsies showed non-specific pleuritis (fibrinous pleuritis not attributable to a specific benign or malignant etiology). They were pooled from 5 published studies totalling 2434 thoracoscopies
  • Exposure: Not an exposure study. Asbestos is mentioned in two places. In a reviewed Turkish study, it was offered as a possible explanation for female gender being a risk factor. In another reviewed study, a history of asbestos contacts was a reason for surgical biopsy in cases where thoracoscopy had been difficult because of fibrin layers and adhesions
  • Main results:
    • Across the 5 pooled studies, 469 of 2434 thoracoscopies resulted in a diagnosis of non-specific pleuritis (range 5-31%, mean 19.2%)
    • Among the 469 patients with non-specific pleuritis, 66 (14.2%) were found to have malignant pleural disease, mostly mesothelioma, during follow-up of at least 21 months
    • In the reviewed Metintas study, a multivariate analysis found three significant risk factors for an eventual malignant diagnosis: CT findings of malignant involvement, thoracic pain and female gender
    • In the reviewed Metintas study of 101 cases of non-specific pleuritis, the false-negative rate for mesothelioma was 16.3%
    • In the reviewed Janssen study, 7 of 10 false-negative mesothelioma cases had a thoracoscopy made difficult by fibrin layers and adhesions. In those cases, a later surgical biopsy was found warranted if there was a history of asbestos contacts or a CT scan suggestive of mesothelioma
    • The authors listed three main indications for a repeated (surgical) intervention: persistent chest pain on the side of the effusion, recurrence of pleural effusion, and CT scan findings suggestive of malignant pleural disease
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that a follow-up of one year after thoracoscopy is most likely sufficient, although the current routine is 2 years. They also concluded that a repeated invasive procedure is indicated only in a limited group of patients
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The authors stated that the safety of limiting follow-up to one year has to be confirmed in future studies

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Etiology, Thoracoscopy, Mesothelioma, Pleural Biopsy, Pleural Effusion.

Browse more research in The Clinical Respiratory Journal, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

J. Janssen, F. Maldonado, M. Metintas. What is the significance of non-specific pleuritis? A trick question. The Clinical Respiratory Journal 2018;12(9):2407-2410. doi:10.1111/crj.12940. PMID: 30004629.

Cite our summary

“What is the significance of non-specific pleuritis? A trick question.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/what-is-the-significance-of-non-specific-pleuritis-a-trick-question.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.