Amoco Corporation's Answers to Robert Henry Villarreal's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Admissions, with Cover Letters and Certificate (2001)

Amoco Corporation's written responses in Villarreal v. GAF Corporation et al. (197th District Court, Cameron County, Texas) to the plaintiff's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admissions. Amoco objected that it owned no Pasadena refinery, denied the admissions, and described its safety practices and when it learned of asbestos hazards. The exhibit also includes two March 9, 2001 transmittal letters and a certificate of written discovery.

What the document holds

• Pages 1-36: Defendant Amoco Corporation's answers to plaintiff's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admissions, with signature block and certificate of service
• Page 37: Andrews & Kurth cover letter to Baron & Budd enclosing the discovery answers (March 9, 2001)
• Page 38: Andrews & Kurth letter to the Cameron County District Clerk enclosing the Certificate of Written Discovery (March 9, 2001)
• Pages 39-40: Certificate of Written Discovery and certificate of service

People and organizations

From Alexis J. Gomez (Andrews & Kurth L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Amoco Corporation); Thomas W. Taylor (Andrews & Kurth L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Amoco Corporation); Tiffani E. Johnson (Legal Assistant to Alexis J. Gomez) to Stephanie Finch (Baron & Budd, plaintiff's counsel); Jennyfer B. Gray (Baron & Budd, plaintiff's counsel); Aurora de la Garza (District Clerk, Cameron County).

• Stephanie Finch (recipient)
• 197th Judicial District Court (named)
• Amoco (named)
• Amoco Oil Company (named)
• Baron & Budd (named)
• GAF Corporation (named)

About this copy

This is document UC-1891 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 40 pages.