No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Union Carbide's Objections and Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Lake v. GAF Corporation (2001)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

Union Carbide's written objections and responses to the plaintiff's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission in Lake v. GAF Corporation, Dallas County, Texas. Many of the responses are objections, and some offer access to Union Carbide's asbestos document repository. The answers address Union Carbide's Institute, West Virginia plant, where the plaintiff's father worked in 1977-79 and 1981. A June 4, 2001 DeHay & Elliston cover letter to plaintiff's counsel is on the last page.

Author
Gary D. Elliston (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation); Paul E. Hamilton (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation)
Published by
DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation
Series
Union Carbide documents, UC-2052
Date
June 4, 2001
Library no.
ACL Doc 17077 · asbestosclaims.law/library/17077
Rights
A document from asbestos litigation, published for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Document UC-2052 · 108 pages · 4.3 MB

What the document holds

  • Pages 1-2: Caption, signature block and certificate of service
  • Pages 3-5: General objection and objections to plaintiff's definitions and instructions
  • Pages 6-40: Objections and answers to Interrogatories 1-21, including trade associations, medical and industrial hygiene staff, warnings, respirators, medical exams, and a list of library holdings
  • Pages 40-107: Remaining interrogatory answers and responses to requests for production and requests for admission (pages 41-103 not provided; pages 104-107 seen)
  • Page 108: DeHay & Elliston cover letter of June 4, 2001 to D. Leanne Jackson enclosing the responses

People and organizations

From Gary D. Elliston (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation); Paul E. Hamilton (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation) to D. Leanne Jackson (Baron & Budd, attorney for Plaintiff Phillip Edward Lake, Jr.).

Pages on our site about what this document covers: OSHA.

About this copy

This is document UC-2052 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 108 pages.

Cite this document

Gary D. Elliston (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation), Paul E. Hamilton (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., attorney for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation). “Union Carbide's Objections and Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Lake v. GAF Corporation.” June 4, 2001. Union Carbide documents, UC-2052. DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 17077. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/17077.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a free case review

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.